Evolution of X‐Chromosome Inactivation


X‐chromosome inactivation is a transcriptional silencing of one of the two X chromosomes that occurs in females of marsupial and eutherian mammals. The process arose and developed as a part of dosage compensation mechanism during differentiation of mammalian X and Y chromosomes. X inactivation started from being imprinted and unstable in marsupials and then was transformed to random and stable in eutherians. The transformation included replacement of the key noncoding nuclear ribonucleic acid master switch gene rsx to xist, and emergency of the X‐inactivation centre responsible for random choice of one of the two X chromosomes. Presumably, further involvement of the xist‐dependent repressive histone modifications together with deoxyribonucleic acid methylation and enrichment of the X chromosome with LINE1 mobile elements, allowed for more efficient spread and maintenance of an inactive state and has made the X‐chromosome inactivation process more complete and stable. During eutherian evolution, X‐chromosome inactivation mechanisms have tended to accumulate the taxon‐ and species‐specific differences.

Key Concepts:

  • X‐chromosome inactivation emerged as part of dosage compensation mechanism caused by differentiation of mammalian X and Y chromosomes.

  • X‐chromosome inactivation is unique for marsupial and eutherian mammals.

  • X‐chromosome inactivation has evolved from imprinted, incomplete, and unstable to random, complete, and efficiently maintained.

  • The long noncoding nuclear RNA controlling X‐chromosome inactivation, initially rsx in marsupials, has been replaced for xist in eutherians.

  • The noncoding nuclear RNA gene xist, responsible for initiation of inactivation in eutherians, emerged from a protein coding gene and a set of mobile elements.

  • Xist and the surrounding genes regulating its expression have formed the inactivation centre that regulate a random choice of one of the two X chromosomes to be transcriptionally silent.

  • Presumably, the main steps leading to complete and stable X‐chromosome inactivation are involvement of the xist‐dependent repressive histone modifications in gene rich clusters together with DNA methylation of the promoters and enrichment of X chromosome with the mobile elements LINE.

  • During eutherian evolution, X‐chromosome inactivation mechanisms mainly accumulated taxon‐ and species‐specific differences.

Keywords: mammals; X inactivation; xist; evolution

Figure 1.

The evolution of epigenetic mechanisms underlying the X‐chromosome inactivation in mammals (Chaumeil et al., ). Xi is inactive X chromosome. The divergence time of the taxa (Ma) is shown at the branches of the phylogenetic tree. Reproduced from Chaumeil et al. , with permission PLoS.

Figure 2.

Comparison of the human and mouse XIC with its homologous region in chicken. Coloured boxes represent genes, arrows show their transcription direction. Homologous genes in different species are shown in the same colour. Lines connect same homologous genes in cognate loci of chicken, mouse and human. cdx4, chic1 and slc16a2 are conserved protein‐coding genes that flank both eutherian XIC and its homologous locus in chicken. cnbp2 is a protein‐coding gene, which was retrotransposed to XIC locus in eutherian lineage. tsx is a testis‐specific protein‐coding gene, which partially evolved from cognate chicken protein‐coding gene fip1l2. Note that in human Ψ TSX is not functional any more and represents a pseudogene. xist, enox (jpx) and ftx are genes of XIC produced nuclear RNA; they show homology to the cognate chicken protein‐coding genes lnx3, uspl and wave4, respectively. The remainder of chicken protein‐coding gene rasl11c is found in eutherian XIC between genes ftx and enox (jpx).

Figure 3.

Comparison of xist gene structure in vole, cow and human. Grey rectangles represent exons. (1–8), exon numbers. Green rectangles indicate parts of introns, which in xist of other species are exons. Lines connect homologous sequences. Coloured rectangle indicate arrays of tandem repeats, named A, B, C, D, E and F which are present in xist exons of all of the three species, and B*‐repeats which is specific for human. Yang species‐specific LINE and SINE (short interspersed nuclear elements) mobile elements are indicated by blue and red arrows, respectively.

Figure 4.

The origin of xist gene from the sequences of the protein‐coding gene lnx3 and various classes of mobile elements (Elisaphenko et al., ). Blue rectangles denote the exons that evolved from the gene lnx3; red rectangles, the exons originating from mobile elements; hatched blue and red rectangles, the exon sequences detectable in the genome but not contained in the xist transcript in the corresponding species. Consensus is a putative ancestral structure of the xist gene. Exon numbering is given for the human (Homo sapiens) and mouse (Mus musculus) xist genes: m1–m8 for mouse and h1–h8 for human. Reproduced from Elisaphenko et al. , with permission from PLoS.



Bininda‐Emonds OR, Cardillo M, Jones KE et al. (2007) The delayed rise of present‐day mammals. Nature 446: 507–512.

Chadwick BP and Willard HF (2004) Multiple spatially distinct types of facultative heterochromatin on the human inactive X chromosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101: 17450–17455.

Chaumeil J, Le Baccon P, Wutz A and Heard E (2006) A novel role for xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced. Genes and Development 20: 2223–2237.

Chaumeil J, Waters PD, Koina E et al. (2011) Evolution from xist‐independent to xist‐controlled X‐chromosome inactivation: epigenetic modifications in distantly related mammals. PLoS One 25: e19040.

Chow JC, Ciaudo C, Fazzari MJ et al. (2010) LINE‐1 activity in facultative heterochromatin formation during X chromosome inactivation. Cell 141: 956–969.

Chureau C, Chantalat S, Romito A et al. (2011) ftx is a non‐coding RNA which affects xist expression and chromatin structure within the X‐inactivation center region. Human Molecular Genetics 20: 705–718.

Chureau C, Prissette M, Bourdet A et al. (2002) Comparative sequence analysis of the X‐inactivation center region in mouse, human and bovine. Genome Research 12: 894–908.

Clemson CM, Hall LL, Byron M, McNeil J and Lawrence JB (2006) The X chromosome is organized into a gene‐rich outer rim and an internal core containing silenced nongenic sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 7688–7693.

Cooper DW, Johnston PG, Watson JM and Graves JAM (1993) X inactivation in marsupials and monotremes. Developmental Biology 4: 117–128.

Coppola G, Pinton A, Joudrey EM, Basrur PK and King WA (2008) Spatial distribution of histone isoforms on the bovine active and inactive X chromosomes. Sexual Development 2: 12–23.

Deakin JE, Hore TA, Koina E and Graves JA (2008) The status of dosage compensation in the multiple X chromosomes of the platypus. PLoS Genetics 4: e1000140.

Duret L, Chureau C, Samain S, Weissenbach J and Avner P (2006) The xist RNA gene evolved in eutherians by pseudogenization of a protein‐coding gene. Science 312: 1653–1655.

Elisaphenko EA, Kolesnikov NN, Shevchenko AI et al. (2008) A dual origin of the Xist gene from a protein‐coding gene and a set of transposable elements. PLoS One 3: e2521.

Escamilla‐Del‐Arenal M, da Rocha ST and Heard E (2011) Evolutionary diversity and developmental regulation of X‐chromosome inactivation. Human Genetics 130: 307–327.

Forsdyke DR (2012) Ohno's hypothesis and Muller's paradox: sex chromosome dosage compensation may serve collective gene functions. BioEssays 34: 930–933.

Grant J, Mahadevaiah SK, Khil P et al. (2012) rsx is a metatherian RNA with xist‐like properties in X‐chromosome inactivation. Nature 487: 254–258.

Gupta V, Parisi M, Sturgill D et al. (2006) Global analysis of X‐chromosome dosage compensation. Journal of Biology 5: 3.

Heard E and Disteche CM (2006) Dosage compensation in mammals: fine‐tuning the expression of the X chromosome. Genes and Development 20: 1848–1867.

Hellman A and Chess A (2007) Gene body‐specific methylation on the active X chromosome. Science 315: 1141–1143.

Hore TA, Koina E, Wakefield MJ and Graves JAM (2007) The region homologous to the X‐chromosome inactivation center has been disrupted in marsupial and monotreme mammals. Chromosome Research 15: 147–161.

Johnston CM, Newall AE, Brockdorff N and Nesterova TB (2002b) enox, a novel gene that maps 10 kb upstream of xist and partially escapes X inactivation. Genomics 80: 236–244.

Johnston PG, Watson CM, Adams M and Paull DJ (2002a) Sex chromosome elimination, X chromosome inactivation and reactivation in the southern brown bandicoot Isoodon obesulus (Marsupialia: Peramelidae). Cytogenetic and Genome Research 99: 119–124.

Kalantry S, Purushothaman S, Bowen RB, Starmer J and Magnuson T (2009) Evidence of xist RNA‐independent initiation of mouse imprinted X‐chromosome inactivation. Nature 460: 647–651.

Kohlmaier A, Savarese F, Lachner M et al. (2004) A chromosomal memory triggered by xist regulates histone methylation in X inactivation. PLoS Biology 2: 993–1003.

Kratzer PG, Chapman VM, Lambert H, Evans RE and Liskay RM (1983) Differences in the DNA of the inactive X chromosome of fetal and extraembryonic tissues of mice. Cell 33: 37–42.

Lee JT (2005) Regulation of X‐chromosome counting by Tsix and Xite sequences. Science 309: 768–771.

Lyon MF (1998) X‐chromosome inactivation: a repeat hypothesis. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 80: 133–137.

Mahadevaiah SK, Royo H, VandeBerg JL et al. (2009) Key features of the X inactivation process are conserved between marsupials and eutherians. Current Biology 19: 1478–1484.

Migeon BR (2003) Is tsix repression of xist specific to mouse? Nature Genetics 33: 337.

Mikkelsen TS, Wakefield MJ, Aken B et al. (2007) Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non‐coding sequences. Nature 447: 167–178.

Namekawa SH, Payer B, Huynh KD, Jaenisch R and Lee JT (2010) Two‐step imprinted X inactivation: repeat versus genic silencing in the mouse. Molecular and Cellular Biology 30: 3187–3205.

Nesterova TB, Slobodyanyuk SY, Elisaphenko EA et al. (2001) Characterization of the genomic xist locus in rodents reveals conservation of overall gene structure and tandem repeats but rapid evolution of unique sequence. Genome Research 11: 833–849.

Ohlsson R, Paldi A and Graves JA (2001) Did genomic imprinting and X chromosome inactivation arise from stochastic expression? Trends in Genetics 17: 136–141.

Pack SD, Borodin PM, Serov OL and Searle JB (1993) The X‐autosome translocation in the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.): late replication in female somatic cells and pairing in male meiosis. Chromosoma 102: 355–360.

Reik W and Lewis A (2005) Co‐evolution of X‐chromosome inactivation and imprinting in mammals. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 403–410.

Rens W, O'Brien PC, Grützner F et al. (2007) The multiple sex chromosomes of platypus and echidna are not completely identical and several share homology with the avian Z. Genome Biology 8: R243.

Rens W, Wallduck MS, Lovell FL, Ferguson‐Smith MA and Ferguson‐Smith AC (2010) Epigenetic modifications on X chromosomes in marsupial and monotreme mammals and implications for evolution of dosage compensation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 17657–17662.

Shevchenko AI, Malakhova AA, Elisaphenko EA et al. (2011) Variability of sequence surrounding the xist gene in rodents suggests taxon‐specific regulation of X chromosome inactivation. PLoS One 6: e22771.

Shevchenko AI, Pavlova SV, Dementyeva EV and Zakian SM (2009) Mosaic heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome in vole Microtus rossiaemeridionalis. Mammalian Genome 20: 644–653.

Shevchenko AI, Zakharova IS, Elisaphenko EA et al. (2007) Genes flanking xist in mouse and human are separated on the X chromosome in American marsupials. Chromosome Research 15: 127–136.

Singh N, Ebrahimi FA, Gimelbrant AA et al. (2003) Coordination of the random asynchronous replication of autosomal loci. Nature Genetics 33: 339–341.

Tian D, Sun S and Lee JT (2010) The long noncoding RNA, jpx, is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation. Cell 143: 390–403.

Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Elliott DJ et al. (2002) Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in male mice with targeted disruptions of xist. Journal of Cell Science 115: 4097–4105.

Vaskova EA, Dementyeva EV, Shevchenko AI et al. (in press) Early stages of imprinted X‐inactivation share repressive chromatin modifications with meiotic and postmeiotic XY chromatin in rodents. Journal of Cell Science.

Veyrunes F, Waters PD and Miethke P (2008) Bird‐like sex chromosomes of platypus imply recent origin of mammal sex chromosomes. Genome Research 18: 965–973.

Wrigley JM and Graves JAM (1988) Sex chromosome homology and incomplete, tissue‐specific X‐inactivation suggest that monotremes represent an intermediate stage of mammalian sex chromosome evolution. Journal of Heredity 79: 115–118.

Yen ZC, Meyer IM, Karalic S and Brown CJ (2007) A cross‐species comparison of X‐chromosome inactivation in Eutheria. Genomics 90: 453–463.

Zakharova IS, Shevchenko AI, Shilov AG et al. (2011) Histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 9 marks the inactive metaphase X chromosome in the marsupial Monodelphis domestica. Chromosoma 120: 177–183.

Zeng SM and Yankowitz J (2003) X‐inactivation patterns in human embryonic and extra‐embryonic tissues. Placenta 24: 270–275.

Zhang LF, Huynh KD and Lee JT (2007) Perinucleolar targeting of the inactive X during S phase: evidence for a role in the maintenance of silencing. Cell 129: 693–706.

Further Reading

Brockdorff N (2011) Chromosome silencing mechanisms in X‐chromosome inactivation: unknown unknowns. Development 138: 5057–5065.

Dementyeva EV, Shevchenko AI and Zakian SM (2009) X‐chromosome upregulation and inactivation: two sides of the dosage compensation mechanism in mammals. Bioessays 31: 21–28.

Ellegren H, Hultin‐Rosenberg L, Brunstrom B et al. (2007) Faced with inequality: chicken do not have a general dosage compensation of sex‐linked genes. BMC Biology 5: 40.

Graves JAM (2006) Sex chromosome specialization and degeneration in mammals. Cell 124: 901–914.

Itoh Y, Melamed E, Yang X et al. (2007) Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals. Journal of Biology 6: 2.

Payer B, Lee JT and Namekawa SH (2011) X‐inactivation and X‐reactivation: epigenetic hallmarks of mammalian reproduction and pluripotent stem cells. Human Genetics 130: 265–280.

Ross MT, Grafham DV, Coffey AJ et al. (2005) The DNA sequence of the human X chromosome. Nature 434: 325–337.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Shevchenko, Alexander I, and Zakian, Suren M(Feb 2013) Evolution of X‐Chromosome Inactivation. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020848.pub2]