The Evolution and Ecology of Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates

Cooperative breeding – in which some adults forgo independent breeding and remain as subordinates within a group helping to raise the offspring of others – occurs in between 3% and 10% of vertebrates. The structure of such systems varies greatly, from pairs with helpers-at-the-nest to communal breeders, and may include young helpers or post-reproductive ‘grandparents’. That some individuals spend part, or all, of their lives helping others to reproduce contradicts the concept of ‘selfish’ natural selection and provides an intriguing evolutionary paradox. When and why such apparently altruistic behaviour occurs has, therefore, been the focus of much study. Although constraints and the benefits of group living, may persuade individuals to remain as subordinates, indirect ‘kin’ benefits or direct benefits (such as becoming a breeding helper) appear to favour the subsequent evolution of helping. Cooperative behaviour can have wide-ranging consequences, not only on the biology of the cooperative species, but also on those species it interacts with.

Keywords: cooperation; habitat quality; resource competition; dispersal; population dynamics; helpers

Figure 1. Three species used in studies investigating the evolution of cooperative breeding in vertebrates: (a) Lake Tanganyika cichlid (Neolamprologus pulcher). A breeding group defending their territory against a predatory fish (photo: M. Taborsky); (b) superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus). A dominant male (photo: A. Russell); (c) meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Subordinates help babysit the dominant pairs’ offspring (photo: A.J. Young); (d) naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber, photo: R. A. Mendez).
Figure 2. The percentage of group offspring that is sired by male and female helpers within populations of cooperatively breeding species. Although in some species helpers refrain (almost) completely from direct reproduction, in other species they produce nearly as many offspring as the dominants in the group. Furthermore, in some species helpers of one sex produce a considerably larger part of group offspring through direct reproduction than the other sex. In all cases parentage was assigned using molecular analyses. Species and sources: A, dwarf mongoose (Helogale parvula, Keane et al., 1994); B, wild dog (Lycaon pictus, Girman et al., 1997); C, meerkat (Suricata suricatta, Griffin et al., 2003); D, Lake Tanganyika cichlid (Neolamprologus pulcher, Dierkes et al., 1999); E, Lake Tanganyika cichlid (Julidochromis ornatus, Awata et al., 2005); F, Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis, Richardson et al., 2001); G, moorhen (Gallinula chloropus, McRae, 1996); H, Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens, Quinn et al., 1999); I, white-browed scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis, Whittingham et al., 1997); J, Alpine accentor (Prunella collaris, Hartley et al., 1995); K, pukeko (Porphyrio porphyrioi melanotus, Lambert et al., 1994); L, white-throated magpie-jay (Calocitta formosa, Berg, 2005); M, long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus, Hatchwell et al., 2002); N, superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus, Double and Cockburn, 2003).
Figure 3. The percentage of territories with subordinates in relation to habitat saturation in a given year for the Seychelles warblers on Cousin Island between 1959 and 2006 (r2=0.67, F=28.3, P<0.001). The percentage of habitat saturation for a given year was measured as the number of territories present in that year divided by the maximum number of territories recorded in a given year (n=121). Island photograph courtesy of Lyanne Brouwer and bird photograph courtesy of Cas Eikenaar.
close
 References
    Awata S, Munehara H and Kohda M (2005) Social system and reproduction of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Julidochromis ornatus) in Lake Tanganyika: field observations and parentage analyses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58: 506–516.
    Berg EC (2005) Parentage and reproductive success in the white-throated magpie-jay, Calocitta formosa, a cooperative breeder with female helpers. Animal Behaviour 70: 375–385.
    book Brown JL (ed.) (1987) Helping and Communal Breeding in Birds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Byrne RW and Bates LA (2007) Sociality, evolution and cognition. Current Biology 17: 714–723.
    Clutton-Brock TH (2002) Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science 296: 69–72.
    Dierkes P, Taborsky M and Kohler U (1999) Reproductive parasitism of broodcare helpers in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behavioral Ecology 10: 510–515.
    Double CM and Cockburn A (2003) Subordinate superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) parasitize the reproductive success of attractive dominant males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 270: 379–384.
    Emlen ST (1982) The evolution of helping. 1. An ecological constraints model. 2. The role of behavioral conflict. The American Naturalist 119: 29–39.
    Girman DJ, Mills MGL, Geffen E and Wayne RK (1997) A molecular genetic analysis of social structure, dispersal, and interpack relationships of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 40: 187–198.
    Griffin AS, Pemberton JM, Brotherton PNM et al. (2003). A genetic analysis of breeding success in the cooperative meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Behavioural Ecology 14: 472–480.
    Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1–52.
    Hartley IR, Davies NB, Hatchwell BJ et al. (1995) The polygynandrous mating system of the alpine accentor, Prunella collaris, II. Multiple paternity and parental effort. Animal Behaviour 49: 789–803.
    Hatchwell BJ, Ross DJ, Chaline N, Fowlie MK and Burke T (2002) Parentage in the cooperative breeding system of long-tailed tits, Aegithalos caudatus. Animal Behaviour 64: 55–63.
    Keane B, Waser PM, Creel SR et al. (1994) Subordinate reproduction in dwarf mongooses. Animal Behaviour 47: 65–75.
    book Koenig WD and Dickinson JL (eds) (2004) Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Komdeur J (1992) Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for the evolution of cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warbler. Nature 358: 493–495.
    Komdeur J (2003) Daughters on request – about helpers in the Seychelles warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 270: 3–11.
    Lambert DM, Millar CD, Jack K, Anderson S and Craig JL (1994) Single-locus and multilocus DNA fingerprinting of communally breeding pukeko – do copulations or dominance ensure reproductive success? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 91: 9641–9645.
    Maynard Smith J (1964) Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201: 1145–1147.
    McRae SB (1996) Family values: costs and benefits of communal nesting in the moorhen. Animal Behaviour 52: 225–245.
    Quinn JS, Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW and White BN (1999) Multi-locus DNA fingerprinting supports genetic monogamy in Florida scrub-jays. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45: 1–10.
    Richardson DS, Jury FL, Blaakmeer K, Komdeur J and Burke T (2001) Parentage assignment and extra-group paternity in a cooperative breeder: The Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Molecular Ecology 10: 2263–2273.
    Selander RK (1964) Speciation in wrens of the genus Campylorynchus. University of California Publications in Zoology 74: 1–305.
    book Solomon NG and French JA (eds) (1997) Cooperative Breeding in Mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    book Stacey PB and Koenig WD (eds) (1990) Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-term Studies of Ecology and Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Stacey PB and Ligon JD (1987) Territory quality and dispersal options in the acorn woodpecker, and a challenge to the habitat saturation model of cooperative breeding. The American Naturalist 130: 654–676.
    Stacey PP and Ligon JD (1991) The benefits-of-philopatry hypothesis for the evolution of cooperative breeding: variation in territory quality and group size effects. The American Naturalist 137: 831–846.
    Whittingham LA, Dunn PO and Magrath RD (1997) Relatedness, polyandry and extra-group paternity in the cooperatively breeding white-browed scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 40: 261–270.
    book Woolfenden GE and Fitzpatrick J (eds) (1984) The Florida Scrub Jay: Demography of a Cooperative-breeding Bird. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
 Further Reading
    Arnold KE and Owens IPF (1998) Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life history hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 265: 739–745.
    other Cezilly F (ed.) (2007) Cooperative breeding. Behavioural Processes 76, 61–182
    Cockburn A (1998) Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 141–177.
    book Emlen ST (1991) "Evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammals". In: Krebs JR and Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, pp. 301–337. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
    Hatchwell BJ and Komdeur J (2000) Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Animal Behaviour 59: 1079–1086.
    Komdeur J and Richardson DS (2007) Molecular ecology reveals the hidden complexities of the Seychelles warbler. Advances in the Study of Behavior 37: 147–187.
    book Korb J and Heinze J (eds) (2008) Ecology of Social Evolution. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
    book MacDonald DW and Moehlman PD (1982) "Cooperation, altruism, and restraint in the reproduction of carnivores". In: Bateson PPG and Klopfer P (eds) Perspectives in Ethology, pp. 433–467. New York: Plenum.
    West SA, Griffin AS and Gardner A (2007) Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Current Biology 17: 661–672.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Komdeur, Jan, Eikenaar, Cas, Brouwer, Lyanne, and Richardson, David S(Dec 2008) The Evolution and Ecology of Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021218]