Plant Virus Movement and the Impact of RNA Silencing


Plant virus‐encoded movement proteins support the spread of viral genomes through plasmodesmata and thus represent keys to the molecular mechanisms underlying macromolecular trafficking and intercellular communication. Although Tobacco mosaic virus employs a movement mechanism involving the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)/actin network and microtubules, other viruses interact with membranes of the secretory or endocytic pathways. In addition to replication and targeting of plasmodesmata, efficient virus movement depends on the ability of the virus to interact with the ribonucleic acid (RNA) silencing machinery. Viruses generally encode proteins that suppress silencing and, thus, enhance replication and systemic movement. However, new findings suggest that viruses may also be able to subvert the host silencing machinery to manipulate gene expression in cells to be invaded. Thus, successful virus movement relies on orchestrated interactions of virus‐encoded proteins with the cellular transport and RNA silencing immune systems of the plant.

Key concepts

  • Viruses and other macromolecules are transported through plasmodesmata.

  • Virus movement requires virus‐encoded proteins and interacting host factors.

  • Viruses use different strategies of movement.

  • Viruses interfere with RNA silencing in complex ways.

Keywords: plant virus; plasmodesmata; RNA silencing; membranes; cytoskeleton; movement protein

Figure 1.

PD and viral strategies for movement. (a) Structure of PD. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the (PM) are continuous through the pore. In its central cavity, the ER is connected to the (DT). The cytoplasmic space between PM and DT may represent the major pathway for the exchange of molecules between adjacent cells. Proteins embedded in the PM and ER may form microchannels that act as molecular sieves to restrict the free diffusion of macromolecules (CW, ). (b) Virus movement in the form of a nonencapsidated MP:vRNA (vRNP) complex, as exemplified by TMV. The MP of this virus increases the size exclusion limit of PD but otherwise does not induce strong structural changes in PD. (c) Movement of ‘tubule‐forming’ viruses, like GFLV, CPMV or CaMV. The DT is replaced by a tubule consisting of assembled MP subunits and through which virion particles are transported.

Figure 2.

Examples of nonencapsidated and encapsidated viral delivery to PD. (a) Mechanism used by TMV. Nonencapsidated MP:vRNA (vRNP) complexes are part of ER‐associated viral replication complexes (VRCs) that are transported by lateral diffusion in the ER membrane to PD. ER‐associated actin filaments support ER‐associated movement of the complexes in a manner controlled by actin‐associated proteins. Interactions between MP and (MT) may be involved in the formation of movement–competent complexes and in the guidance of the complexes to PD. CW, cell wall; MT, microtubules; ER, endoplasmic reticulum. (b) Mechanism used by GFLV. This virus replicates in association with the ER and the targeting of the MP to PD for tubule formation depends on the secretory pathway (depicted as Golgi complex with vesicles). This pathway may function in the PD targeting of MP (1) or of a plant protein (2), which acts as a receptor for MP at PD.

Figure 3.

Mechanisms of MP‐mediated delivery of vRNA to PD. (a) and (b) Example of TMV. In cells at the leading front of spreading infection sites in leaves (a) the MP is produced in ER‐associated viral replication complexes (VRCs) where it binds vRNA to form a MP:vRNA (vRNP) complex. The vRNP‐associated VRCs form distinct particles that are released from microtubule anchorage sites for ER‐mediated transport to PD. Release may involve microtubule polymerization and interactions of MP with EB1. The VRCs also release MP for vRNP‐independent transport to PD and interaction with a plasmodesmal receptor. The MP or its interaction with the receptor leads to an increase in the SEL of PD, thus allowing the mobile VRC or VRC‐derived particle to move into the adjacent, noninfected cell. ER‐associated actin filaments provide motility to the ER network and may contribute to ER‐mediated transport with myosin motors. Moreover, the ER‐aligned actin filaments may exert control over ER‐mediated transport by association with actin‐binding proteins. In cells behind the leading front of infection (b) the MP no longer increases the SEL of PD. In addition, the MP accumulates on microtubules, thus interfering with the release and motility of the VRC particle. Accumulation of MP on microtubules is enhanced by interaction with MPB2C, which thus acts as a negative regulator in TMV movement. (c) Example of PVX. PVX encodes three proteins required for the delivery of vRNA to PD. TGBp2 and TGBp3 are integral membrane proteins that form a complex that associates with the TGBp1:vRNA complex for ER/actin‐mediated transport to PD. At the PD, the TGBp1 acts to dilate the PD channel and the TGBp1:vRNA complex is released from pTGB2/pTGB3 for intercellular movement. Subsequently, the TGBp2 and TGBp3 proteins are recycled to the ER via endocytic vesicles.

Figure 4.

Virus movement may involve the spread of virus‐derived siRNAs ahead of the infection front. (a) Dicer cleavage of viral dsRNA produced during replication results in the formation of 21 nt siRNAs which programs AGO‐containing RNA‐induced silencing complexes (RISC) for degradation of cognate viral RNA. The siRNAs spread through PD and associate with RISC complexes in adjacent cells and thus cause immunization of cells to be infected. (b) Dicer‐mediated cleavage of viral dsRNA leads to production of siRNAs that target host mRNA transcripts for degradation, thus resulting in the reprogramming of gene expression in infected cells. Spreading of these siRNAs through PD triggers the degradation of host transcripts in cells ahead of the infection front (subversion). The spread of virus‐ or host‐derived siRNAs and, thus, the subversion of gene expression in cells ahead of the infection front may represent a viral strategy to create an optimal environment in cells to be infected. Modified from Ding and Voinnet , with permission from Elsevier.



Ashby J, Boutant E, Seemanpillai M et al. (2006) Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein functions as a structural microtubule‐associated protein. Journal of Virology 80: 8329–8344.

Avisar D, Prokhnevsky AI and Dolja VV (2008) Class VIII myosins are required for plasmodesmatal localization of a closterovirus Hsp70 homolog. Journal of Virology 82: 2836–2843.

Bayne EH, Rakitina DV, Morozov SY and Baulcombe DC (2005) Cell‐to‐cell movement of Potato potexvirus X is dependent on suppression of RNA silencing. Plant Journal 44: 471–482.

Boyko V, Ashby JA, Suslova E et al. (2002) Intramolecular complementing mutations in Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein confirm a role for microtubule association in viral RNA transport. Journal of Virology 76: 3974–3980.

Boyko V, Ferralli J, Ashby J, Schellenbaum P and Heinlein M (2000) Function of microtubules in intercellular transport of plant virus RNA. Nature Cell Biology 2: 826–832.

Boyko V, Hu Q, Seemanpillai M, Ashby J and Heinlein M (2007) Validation of microtubule‐associated Tobacco mosaic virus RNA movement and involvement of microtubule‐aligned particle trafficking. Plant Journal 51: 589–603.

Brandner K, Sambade A, Boutant E et al. (2008) TMV movement protein interacts with GFP‐tagged microtubule end‐binding protein 1 (EB1). Plant Physiology 147: 611–623.

Canto T and Palukaitis P (2005) Subcellular distribution of mutant movement proteins of Cucumber mosaic virus fused to green fluorescent proteins. Journal of General Virology 86: 1223–1228.

Carrington JC, Jensen PE and Schaad MC (1998) Genetic evidence for an essential role for potyvirus CI protein in cell‐to‐cell movement. Plant Journal 14: 393–400.

Carvalho MF, Turgeon R and Lazarowitz SG (2006) The geminivirus nuclear shuttle protein NSP inhibits the activity of AtNSI, a vascular‐expressed Arabidopsis acetyltransferase regulated with the sink‐to‐source transition. Plant Physiology 140: 1317–1330.

Chen M‐H, Sheng J, Hind G, Handa AK and Citovsky V (2000) Interaction between the Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein and host cell pectin methylesterases is required for viral cell‐to‐cell movement. EMBO Journal 19: 913–920.

Chen MH, Tian GW, Gafni Y and Citovsky V (2005) Effects of calreticulin on viral cell‐to‐cell movement. Plant Physiology 138: 1866–1876.

Cheng CP, Tzafrir I, Lockhart BE and Olszewski NE (1998) Tubules containing virions are present in plant tissues infected with Commelina yellow mottle badnavirus. Journal of General Virology 79: 925–929.

Citovsky V, Knorr D, Schuster G and Zambryski P (1990) The P30 movement protein of Tobacco mosaic virus is a single‐stranded nucleic acid binding protein. Cell 60: 637–647.

Cullen BR (2009) Viral and cellular messenger RNA targets of viral microRNAs. Nature 457: 421–425.

Curin M, Ojangu EL, Trutnyeva K et al. (2007) MPB2C, a microtubule‐associated plant factor, is required for microtubular accumulation of Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein in plants. Plant Physiology 143: 801–811.

Diaz‐Pendon JA and Ding S‐W (2008) Direct and indirect roles of viral suppressors of RNA silencing in pathogenesis. Annual Review of Phytopathogy 46: 303–326.

Ding SW and Voinnet O (2007) Antiviral immunity directed by small RNAs. Cell 130: 413–426.

Dorokhov YL, Alexandrova NM, Miroshnichenko NA and Atabekov JG (1984) The informosome‐like virus‐specific ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) may be involved in the transport of Tobacco mosaic virus infection. Virology 137: 127–134.

Dorokhov YL, Mäkinen K, Yu O et al. (1999) A novel function for a ubiquitous plant enzyme pectin methylesterase: The host‐cell receptor for the Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein. FEBS Letters 461: 223–228.

Dunoyer P, Thomas C, Harrison S, Revers F and Maule A (2004) A cysteine‐rich plant protein potentiates potyvirus movement through an interaction with the virus genome‐linked protein VPg. Journal of Virology 78: 2301–2309.

Ferralli J, Ashby J, Fasler M, Boyko V and Heinlein M (2006) Disruption of microtubule organization and centrosome function by expression of Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein. Journal of Virology 80: 5807–5821.

Florentino LH, Santos AA, Fontenelle MR et al. (2006) A PERK‐like receptor kinase interacts with the geminivirus nuclear shuttle protein and potentiates viral infection. Journal of Virology 80: 6648–6656.

Foster TM, Lough TJ, Emerson SJ et al. (2002) A surveillance system regulates selective entry of RNA into the shoot apex. Plant Cell 14: 1497–1508.

Fridborg I, Grainger J, Page A et al. (2003) TIP, a novel host factor linking callose degradation with the cell‐to‐cell movement of Potato virus X. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 16: 132–140.

Grieco F, Castellano MA, Di Sansebastiano GP et al. (1999) Subcellular localization and in vivo identification of the putative movement protein of olive latent virus 2. Journal of General Virology 80(part 5): 1103–1109.

Guenoune‐Gelbart D, Elbaum M, Sagi G, Levy A and Epel BL (2008) Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) replicase and movement protein function synergistically in facilitating TMV spread by lateral diffusion in the plasmodesmal desmotubule of Nicotiana benthamiana. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interaction 21: 335–345.

Haupt S, Cowan GH, Ziegler A et al. (2005) Two plant‐viral movement proteins traffic in the endocytic recycling pathway. Plant Cell 17: 164–181.

Heinlein M, Epel BL, Padgett HS and Beachy RN (1995) Interaction of tobamovirus movement proteins with the plant cytoskeleton. Science 270: 1983–1985.

Heinlein M, Padgett HS, Gens JS et al. (1998) Changing patterns of localization of the Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein and replicase to the endoplasmic reticulum and microtubules during infection. Plant Cell 10: 1107–1120.

Hofius D, Maier AT, Dietrich C et al. (2007) Capsid protein‐mediated recruitment of host DnaJ‐like proteins is required for Potato virus Y infection in tobacco plants. Journal of Virology 81: 11870–11880.

Hofmann C, Niehl A, Sambade A, Steinmetz A and Heinlein M (2009) Inhibition of TMV movement by expression of an actin‐binding protein. Plant Physiology 149: 1810–1823.

Hofmann C, Sambade A and Heinlein M (2007) Plasmodesmata and intercellular transport of viral RNA. Biochemical Society Transactions 35: 142–145.

Huang Z, Andianov VM, Han Y and Howell SH (2001) Identification of Arabidopsis proteins that interact with the Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) movement protein. Plant Molecular Biology 47: 663–675.

Iglesias VA and Meins F Jr (2000) Movement of plant viruses is delayed in a β‐1,3‐glucanase‐deficient mutant showing a reduced plasmodesmatal size exclusion limit and enhanced callose deposition. Plant Journal 21: 157–166.

Jimenez I, Lopez L, Alamillo JM, Valli A and Garcia JA (2006) Identification of a Plum pox virus CI‐interacting protein from chloroplast that has a negative effect in virus infection. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 19: 350–358.

Kaido M, Inoue Y, Takeda Y et al. (2007) Downregulation of the NbNACa1 gene encoding a movement‐protein‐interacting protein reduces cell‐to‐cell movement of Brome mosaic virus in Nicotiana benthamiana. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 20: 671–681.

Kaplan IB, Zhang L and Palukaitis P (1998) Characterization of Cucumber mosaic virus. V. Cell‐to‐cell movement requires capsid protein but not virions. Virology 246: 221–231.

Karasev AV, Kashina AS, Gelfand VI and Dolja VV (1992) HSP70‐related 65 kDa protein of Beet yellows closterovirus is a microtubule‐binding protein. FEBS Letters 304: 12–14.

Kasteel D, van der Wel N, Jansen K, Goldbach R and van Lent J (1997) Tubule‐forming capacity of the movement proteins of Alfalfa mosaic virus and Brome mosaic virus. Journal of General Virology 78: 2089–2093.

Kawakami S, Watanabe Y and Beachy RN (2004) Tobacco mosaic virus infection spreads cell to cell as intact replication complexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101: 6291–6296.

Kim KS and Fulton JP (1971) Tubules with viruslike particles in leaf cells infected with bean pod mottle virus. Virology 43: 329–337.

Kim SH, Macfarlane S, Kalinina NO et al. (2007) Interaction of a plant virus‐encoded protein with the major nucleolar protein fibrillarin is required for systemic virus infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 11115–11120.

Kitajima EW, Lauritis JA and Swift H (1969) Fine structure of zinnial leaf tissues infected with dahlia mosaic virus. Virology 39: 240–249.

Kragler F, Curin M, Trutnyeva K, Gansch A and Waigmann E (2003) MPB2C, a microtubule‐associated plant protein binds to and interferes with cell‐to‐cell transport of Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein. Plant Physiology 132: 1870–1883.

Laporte C, Vetter G, Loudes AM et al. (2003) Involvement of the secretory pathway and the cytoskeleton in intracellular targeting and tubule assembly of Grapevine fanleaf virus movement protein in tobacco BY‐2 cells. Plant Cell 15: 2058–2075.

Lee JY, Taoka K, Yoo BC et al. (2005) Plasmodesmal‐associated protein kinase in tobacco and Arabidopsis recognizes a subset of non‐cell‐autonomous proteins. Plant Cell 17: 2817–2831.

van Lent J, Storms M, van der Meer F, Wellink J and Goldbach R (1991) Tubular structures involved in movement of Cowpea mosaic virus are also formed in infected cowpea protoplasts. Journal of General Virology 72: 2615–2623.

Leonard S, Plante D, Wittmann S et al. (2000) Complex formation between potyvirus VPg and translation eukaryotic initiation factor 4E correlates with virus infectivity. Journal of Virology 74: 7730–7737.

Leonard S, Viel C, Beauchemin C et al. (2004) Interaction of VPg‐Pro of Turnip mosaic virus with the translation initiation factor 4E and the poly(A)‐binding protein in planta. Journal of General Virology 85: 1055–1063.

Li Y, Wu MY, Song HH, Hu X and Qiu BS (2005) Identification of a tobacco protein interacting with Tomato mosaic virus coat protein and facilitating long‐distance movement of virus. Archives of Virology 150: 1993–2008.

Linstead PJ, Hills GJ, Plaskitt KA et al. (1988) The subcellular location of the gene I product of Cauliflower mosaic virus is consistent with a function associated with virus spread. Journal of General Virology 69: 1809–1818.

Lucas WJ and Lee JY (2004) Plasmodesmata as a supracellular control network in plants. Nature Reviews in Molecular and Cellular Biology 5: 712–726.

Mariano AC, Andrade MO, Santos AA et al. (2004) Identification of a novel receptor‐like protein kinase that interacts with a geminivirus nuclear shuttle protein. Virology 318: 24–31.

Más P and Beachy RN (1999) Replication of Tobacco mosaic virus on endoplasmic reticulum and role of the cytoskeleton and virus movement in intracellular distribution of viral RNA. Journal of Cell Biology 147: 945–958.

Matsushita M, Miyakawa O, Deguchi M, Nishiguchi M and Nyunoya H (2002) Cloning of a tobacco cDNA coding for a putative transcriptional coactivator MBF1 that interacts with the Tomato mosaic virus movement protein. Journal of Experimental Botany 53: 1531–1532.

Matsushita Y, Deguchi M, Youda M, Nishiguchi M and Nyunoya H (2001) The Tomato mosaic tobamovirus movement protein interacts with a putative transcriptional coactivator KELP. Molecules and Cells 12: 57–66.

McGarry RC, Barron YD, Carvalho MF et al. (2003) A novel Arabidopsis acetyltransferase interacts with the geminivirus movement protein NSP. Plant Cell 15: 1605–1618.

McLean BG, Zupan J and Zambryski PC (1995) Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein associates with the cytoskeleton in tobacco plants. Plant Cell 7: 2101–2114.

Moissiard G and Voinnet O (2006) RNA silencing of host transcripts by Cauliflower mosaic virus requires coordinated action of the four Arabidopsis Dicer‐like proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 19593–19598.

Oparka KJ, Prior DAM, Santa Cruz S, Padgett HS and Beachy RN (1997) Gating of epidermal plasmodesmata is restricted to the leading edge of expanding infection sites of Tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Journal 12: 781–789.

Oparka KJ, Roberts AG, Boevink P et al. (1999) Simple, but not branched, plasmodesmata allow the nonspecific trafficking of proteins in developing tobacco leaves. Cell 97: 743–754.

Ritzenthaler C, Schmidt A‐C, Michler P, Stussi‐Garaud C and Pinck L (1995) Grapevine fanleaf nepovirus putative movement protein is involved in tubule formation in vivo. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interaction 8: 379–387.

Robaglia C and Caranta C (2006) Translation initiation factors: a weak link in plant RNA virus infection. Trends in Plant Sciences 11: 40–45.

Roberts IM, Wang D, Findlay K and Maule AJ (1998) Ultrastructural and temporal observations of the potyvirus cylindrical inclusions (CIs) show that the CI protein acts transiently in aiding virus movement. Virology 245: 173–181.

Rojas MR, Hagen C, Lucas WJ and Gilbertson RL (2005) Exploiting chinks in the plant's armor: evolution and emergence of geminiviruses. Annual Review in Phytopathology 43: 361–394.

Rojas MR, Zerbini M, Allison RF, Gilbertson RL and Lucas WJ (1997) Capsid protein and helper component‐proteinase function as potyvirus cell‐to‐cell movement proteins. Virology 237: 283–295.

Sagi G, Katz A, Guenoune‐Gelbart D and Epel BL (2005) Class 1 reversibly glycosylated polypeptides are plasmodesmal‐associated proteins delivered to plasmodesmata via the golgi apparatus. Plant Cell 17: 1788–1800.

Sambade A, Brandner K, Hofmann C et al. (2008) Transport of TMV movement protein particles associated with the targeting of RNA to plasmodesmata. Traffic 9: 2073–2088.

Sanchez‐Navarro JA and Bol JF (2001) Role of the Alfalfa mosaic virus movement protein and coat protein in virus transport. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 14: 1051–1062.

Sanderfoot AA, Ingham DJ and Lazarowitz SG (1996) A viral movement protein as a nuclear shuttle. The geminivirus BR1 movement protein contains domains essential for interaction with BL1 and nuclear localization. Plant Physiology 110: 23–33.

Sasaki N, Kaido M, Okuno T and Mise K (2005) Coat protein‐independent cell‐to‐cell movement of bromoviruses expressing Brome mosaic virus movement protein with an adaptation‐related amino acid change in the central region. Archives in Virology 150: 1231–1240.

Schaad MC, Anderberg RJ and Carrington JC (2000) Strain‐specific interaction of the Tobacco etch virus NIa protein with the translation initiation factor eIF4E in the yeast two‐hybrid system. Virology 273: 300–306.

Schwach F, Vaistij FE, Jones L and Baulcombe DC (2005) An RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase prevents meristem invasion by Potato virus X and is required for the activity but not the production of a systemic silencing signal. Plant Physiology 138: 1842–1852.

Seemanpillai M, Elamawi R, Ritzenthaler C and Heinlein M (2006) Challenging the role of microtubules in Tobacco mosaic virus movement by drug treatments is disputable. Journal of Virology 80: 6712–6715.

Siddiqui SA, Sarmiento C, Truve E, Lehto H and Lehto K (2008) Phenotypes and functional effects caused by various viral RNA silencing suppressors in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana and N. tabacum. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 21: 178–187.

Soellick TR, Uhrig JF, Bucher GL, Kellmann JW and Schreier PH (2000) The movement protein NSm of Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus: RNA binding, interaction with TSWV N protein, and identification of interacting plant proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 2373–2378.

Storms MMH, Kormelink R, Peters D, van Lent JWM and Goldbach RW (1995) The nonstructural NSm protein of tomato spotted wilt virus induces tubular structures in plant and insect cells. Virology 214: 485–493.

Stussi‐Garaud C, Haeberle AM, Ritzenthaler C, Rohfritsch O and Lebeurier G (1994) Electron microscopy of plant viruses. Biology of the Cell 80: 147–153.

Szécsi J, Ding XS, Lim CO et al. (1999) Development of Tobacco mosaic virus infection sites in Nicothiana benthamiana. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 2: 143–152.

Thomas CL, Bayer EM, Ritzenthaler C, Fernandez‐Calvino L and Maule AJ (2008) Specific targeting of a plasmodesmal protein affecting cell‐to‐cell communication. PLoS Biology 6: e7.

Vogler H, Kwon MO, Dang V et al. (2008) Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein enhances the spread of RNA silencing. PLoS Pathogens 4: e1000038.

Waigmann E, Lucas W, Citovsky V and Zambryski P (1994) Direct functional assay for Tobacco mosaic virus cell‐to‐cell movement protein and identification of a domain involved in increasing plasmodesmal permeability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 91: 1433–1437.

Wieczorek A and Sanfacon H (1993) Characterization and subcellular location of tomato rigspot nepovirus putative movement protein. Virology 194: 734–742.

Winter N, Kollwig G, Zhang S and Kragler F (2007) MPB2C, a microtubule‐associated protein, regulates non‐cell‐autonomy of the homeodomain protein KNOTTED1. Plant Cell 19: 3001–3018.

Wittmann S, Chatel H, Fortin MG and Laliberte JF (1997) Interaction of the viral protein genome linked of Turnip mosaic potyvirus with the translational eukaryotic initiation factor (iso) 4E of Arabidopsis thaliana using the yeast two‐hybrid system. Virology 234: 84–92.

Wright KM, Wood NT, Roberts AG et al. (2007) Targeting of TMV movement protein to plasmodesmata requires the actin/ER network; evidence from FRAP. Traffic 8: 21–31.

Yoshioka K, Matsushita Y, Kasahara M, Konagaya K and Nyunoya H (2004) Interaction of Tomato mosaic virus movement protein with tobacco RIO kinase. Molecules and Cells 17: 223–229.

Zamyatnin AA Jr, Solovyev AG, Savenkov EI et al. (2004) Transient coexpression of individual genes encoded by the triple gene block of Potato mop‐top virus reveals requirements for TGBp1 trafficking. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 17: 921–930.

Further Reading

Heinlein M (2008) Microtubules and viral movement. In: Nick P (ed.) Plant Microtubules, Plant Cell Monographs, vol. 11 pp. 141–173. Berlin: Springer.

Heinlein M and Epel BL (2004) Macromolecular transport and signaling through plasmodesmata. International Review of Cytology 235: 93–164.

Morozov SY and Solovyev AG (2003) Triple gene block: modular design of a multifunctional machine for plant virus movement. Journal of General Virology 84: 1351–1366.

Oparka K (ed.) (2005) Plasmodesmata. Annual Plant Reviews, vol. 18. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Ruiz‐Ferrer V and Voinnet O (2009) Roles of plant small RNAs in biotic stress responses. Annual Review in Plant Biology 60: 485–510.

Waigmann E and Heinlein M (eds) (2007) Viral Transport in Plants. Plant Cell Monographs, vol. 7. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Heinlein, Manfred(Dec 2009) Plant Virus Movement and the Impact of RNA Silencing. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021262]