Powdery Mildews


Powdery mildews are an important group of parasitic fungi causing disease in over 7600 species of host plants. They are obligate biotrophic parasites, obtaining their nutrients from the host through intracellular feeding structures known as haustoria. Many species of powdery mildews have a high degree of host specialization, infecting only one or a few closely related host genera. Some powdery mildews have well‐documented gene‐for‐gene (GFG) resistance interactions with their host plant, revealing information about the nature of host specificity. This article focuses on the interactions between powdery mildews and the host plant. Events in the establishment of haustoria and biotrophy are reviewed and their influence of infection on host metabolism described. GFG, durable mlo and nonhost‐resistance mechanisms are also described.

Key Concepts

  • Importance of powdery mildews: Powdery mildews are extremely successful fungal parasites. Over 700 species have been described infecting over 7600 species of host plants, many of which are important crops species. Chemicals (fungicides) and resistance genes are used against them, but powdery mildews have the ability to rapidly adapt and defeat these control measures.

  • Obligate biotrophy: All powdery mildews are obligate biotrophs, requiring a living host to grow and reproduce.

  • Haustoria: The feeding structures produced by powdery mildews to obtain nutrients from epidermal cells of the host plants.

  • Host specificity: Many powdery mildews have a high degree of host specialization, and can only grow on one or a few closely related plant genera. Infection can even be restricted to single genotypes of a specific host, as typified by gene‐for‐gene (GFG) resistance.

  • GFG resistance: GFG resistance has been extensively investigated in the interaction between barley powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) and the host plant, barley. In GFG resistance, an avirulence (avr) gene in the parasite matches a resistance (R) gene in the host causing a recognition event that triggers defence responses and prevents infection by the parasite. If either the avr gene or the R gene is lacking, the parasite is not recognized and can become established as a parasite. In barley, over 85 powdery mildew R genes have been described, and over 25 avr gene loci have been mapped in Bgh.

  • mlo resistance: A loss‐of‐function mutation in the barley MLO protein results in failure of Bgh to establish a successful infection.mlo resistance has been widely used in barley breeding, and has so far proved to be durable.

  • Nonhost resistance: Plants are resistant to most invading pathogens, a feature described as nonhost resistance (NHR). Only those adapted microbes that are able to overcome this NHR are able to infect and become pathogens. The extreme specificity of some powdery mildew/host interactions has enabled investigation into the basis of NHR. A series of penArabidopsis mutants with enhanced penetration by nonadapted Bgh have been defined. Genes coding for pen1‐pen3 have been identified, enabling key proteins required for NHR to be identified.

Keywords: powdery mildew; haustoria; gene‐for‐gene resistance; mlo resistance; nonhost resistance

Figure 1.

(a) Lifecycle of powdery mildews. Infection of host plants during the growing season is from wind‐dispersed asexual conidiospores produced abundantly on leaves and other aerial parts of plants. Many powdery mildews have a sexual phase resulting in the formation of ascospores within a cleistothecium, a closed spherical ascocarp. Many powdery mildews, including Erysiphe cichoracearum, do not have a sexual stage. (b) Cleistothecium from Podosphaeria fusca on the surface of courgette (zucchini) plant (left) and squashed to reveal an ascus and eight ascospores contained inside (right). Photographs reproduced by permission of Alejandro Pérez, University of Malaga.

Figure 2.

Host and nonhost interactions with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei: (a)–(b) Nonhost interactions. (a) Germination of Bgh spore on Arabidopsis 72 h after inoculation showing appressorium (Ap), cell wall apposition (CWA) and associated vesicles (V) stained brown with 3,3‐diaminobenzidine for hydrogen peroxide. Contact points beneath the primary germ tube (PGT) and an Appressorial lobe (Apl) also stain for hydrogen peroxide. (b) Accumulation of PEN2‐GFP‐TM (green) at the attempted penetration point of Bgh approximately 14 hpi on the Arabidopsis leaf surface. The fungus is stained with the organic dye FM 4‐64 form (red). (c) Successful infection of Bgh on barley showing the formation of haustoria in epidermal cells. Photographs are reproduced by permission of (a) Ralph Hückelhoven, Technical University of Munich and (b) Rene Fuchs, The Sainsbury Laboratory and (c) Pietro Spanu, Imperial College London.



An QL, Ehlers K, Kogel KH, van Bel AJE and Huckelhoven R (2006) Multivesicular compartments proliferate in susceptible and resistant MLA12‐barley leaves in response to infection by the biotrophic powdery mildew fungus. New Phytologist 172: 563–576.

Assaad FF, Qiu JL, Youngs H et al. (2004) The PEN1 syntaxin defines a novel cellular compartment upon fungal Attack and is required for the timely assembly of papillae. Molecular Biology of the Cell 15: 5118–5129.

Bai YL, Pavan S, Zheng Z et al. (2008) Naturally occurring broad‐spectrum powdery mildew resistance in a Central American tomato accession is caused by loss of Mlo function. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 21: 30–39.

Bhat RA, Miklis M, Schmelzer E, Schulze‐Lefert P and Panstruga R (2005) Recruitment and interaction dynamics of plant penetration resistance components in a plasma membrane microdomain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102: 3135–3140.

Bieri S, Mauch S, Shen QH et al. (2004) RAR1 positively controls steady state levels of barley MLA resistance proteins and enables sufficient MLA6 accumulation for effective resistance. Plant Cell 16: 3480–3495.

Both M, Csukai M, Stumph MPH and Spanu PD (2005) Gene expression profiles of Blumeria graminis indicate dynamic changes to primary metabolism during development of a obligate biotrophic pathogen. Plant Cell 17: 2107–2122.

Boyd LA, Smith PH, Foster EM and Brown JKM (1995) The effects of allelic variation at the MLA resistance locus in barley on the early development of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei and host responses. Plant Journal 7: 959–968.

Brown JKM and Jessop AC (1995) Genetics of avirulences in Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei. Plant Pathology 44: 1039–1049.

Büschges R, Hollricher K, Panstruga R et al. (1997) The barley Mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell 88: 695–705.

Caffier V and Laurens F (2005) Breakdown of Pl2, a major gene of resistance to apple powdery mildew, in a French experimental orchard. Plant Pathology 54: 116–124.

Caldo RA, Nettleton D, Peng JQ and Wise RP (2006) Stage‐specific suppression of basal defense discriminates barley plants containing fast‐ and delayed‐acting Mla powdery mildew resistance alleles. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 19: 939–947.

Carver TLW, Kunoh H, Thomas BJ and Nicholson RL (1999) Release and visualisation of the extracellular matrix of conidia of Blumeria graminis. Mycological Research 103: 547–560.

Collins NC, Thordal‐Christensen H, Lipka V et al. (2003) SNARE‐protein‐mediated disease resistance at the plant cell wall. Nature 425: 973–977.

Devoto A, Hartmann HA, Piffanelli P et al. (2003) Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the plant‐specific seven‐transmembrane MLO family. Journal of Molecular Evolution 56: 77–88.

Flor HH (1955) Host–parasite interaction in flax rust – its genetics and other implications. Phytopathology 45: 680–685.

Görg R, Hollricher K and Schulze‐Lefert P (1993) Functional analysis and RFLP‐mediated mapping of the Mlg resistance locus in barley. Plant Journal 3: 857–866.

Gregersen PL, Thordal‐Christensen H, Forster H and Collinge DB (1997) Differential gene transcript accumulation in barley leaf epidermis and mesophyll in response to attack by Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (syn. Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei). Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 51: 85–97.

Halterman DA, Wei FS and Wise RP (2003) Powdery mildew induced Mla mRNAs are alternatively spliced and contain multiple upstream open reading frames. Plant Physiology 131: 558–567.

Halterman DA and Wise RP (2004) A single‐amino acid substitution in the sixth leucine‐rich repeat of barley MLA6 and MLA13 alleviates dependence on RAR1 for disease resistance signaling. Plant Journal 38: 215–226.

Hein I, Pacak MB, Hrubikova K et al. (2005) Virus‐induced gene silencing‐based functional characterization of genes associated with powdery mildew resistance in barley. Plant Physiology 138: 2155–2164.

Huang XQ and Roder MS (2004) Molecular mapping of powdery mildew resistance genes in wheat: a review. Euphytica 137: 203–222.

Jarosch B, Kogel KH and Schaffrath U (1999) The ambivalence of the barley Mlo locus: mutations conferring resistance against powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) enhance susceptibility to the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 12: 508–514.

Jørgensen JH (1992) Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica 63: 141–152.

Jørgensen JH (1994) Genetics of powdery mildew resistance in barley. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 13: 97–119.

Kim MC, Panstruga R, Elliott C et al. (2002) Calmodulin interacts with MLO to regulate defence against mildew in barley. Nature 416: 447–450.

Koh S, André A, Edwards H, Ehrhardt D and Somerville S (2005) Arabidopsis thaliana subcellular responses to compatible Erysiphe cichoracearum infections. Plant Journal 44: 516–529.

Kunoh H, Kuroda K, Hayashimoto A and Ishizaki H (1986) Induced susceptibility and enhanced resistance at the cellular level in barley coleoptiles. II. The timing and localization of induced susceptibility in a single coleoptile cell and its transfer to an adjacent cell. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 889–895.

Li AL, Wang ML, Zhou RH et al. (2005) Comparative analysis of early H2O2 accumulation in compatible and incompatible wheat–powdery mildew interactions. Plant Pathology 54: 308–316.

Link TI and Voegele RT (2008) Secreted proteins of Uromyces fabae: similarities and stage specificity. Molecular Plant Pathology 9: 59–66.

Lipka V, Dittgen J, Bednarek P et al. (2005) Pre‐ and post‐invasion defenses both contribute to non‐host resistance in Arabidopsis. Science 310: 1180–1183.

Lyngkjær MT and Carver TLW (1999) Induced accessibility and inaccessibility to Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei in barley epidermal cells attacked by a compatible isolate. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 55: 151–162.

Lyngkjær MT, Carver TLW and Zeyen RJ (2001) Virulent Blumeria graminis infection induces penetration susceptibility and suppresses race‐specific hypersensitive resistance against avirulent attack in Mla1‐barley. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 59: 243–256.

Makepeace JC, Oxley SJP, Havis ND et al. (2007) Associations between fungal and abiotic leaf spotting and the presence of mlo alleles in barley. Plant Pathology 56: 934–942.

Moseman JG (1959) Host‐pathogen interaction of the genes for resistance in Hordeum vulgare and for pathogenicity in Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei. Phytopathology 49: 469–472.

Moseman JG, Scharen AL and Greely LW (1964) Propagation of Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici on barley and Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei on wheat. Phytopathology 55: 92–96.

Olesen KL, Carver TLW and Lyngkjaer MF (2003) Fungal suppression of resistance against inappropriate Blumeria graminis formae speciales in barley, oat and wheat. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 62: 37–50.

Piffanelli P, Ramsay L, Waugh R et al. (2006) A barley cultivation‐associated polymorphism conveys resistance to powdery mildew. Nature 430: 887–891.

Powers HR and Sando WJ (1960) Genetic control of the host–parasite relationship in wheat powdery mildew. Phytopathology 50: 454–457.

Prats E, Mur LAJ, Sanderson R and Carver TLW (2005) Nitric oxide contributes both to papilla‐based resistance and the hypersensitive response in barley attacked by Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Molecular Plant Pathology 6: 65–78.

Ridout CJ, Skamnioti P, Porritt O et al. (2006) Multiple avirulence paralogues in cereal powdery mildew fungi may contribute to parasite fitness and defeat of plant resistance. Plant Cell 18: 2402–2414.

Schiffer R, Görg R, Jarosch B et al. (1997) Tissue dependence and differential cordycepin sensitivity of race‐specific resistance responses in the barley powdery mildew interaction. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 10: 830–839.

Shen QH, Saijo Y, Mauch S et al. (2007) Nuclear activity of MLA immune receptors links isolate‐specific and basal disease‐resistance responses. Science 315: 1098–1103.

Shen QH, Zhou FS, Bieri S et al. (2003) Recognition specificity and RAR1/SGT1 dependence in barley Mla disease resistance genes to the powdery mildew fungus. Plant Cell 15: 732–744.

Skamnioti P, Pedersen C, Al‐Chaarani G et al. (2008) Genetic analysis of avirulence genes in Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Fungal Genetics and Biology 45: 243–252.

Stein M, Dittgen J, Sanchez‐Rodriguez C et al. (2006) Arabidopsis PEN3/PDR8, an ATP binding cassette transporter, contributes to nonhost resistance to inappropriate pathogens that enter by direct penetration. Plant Cell 18: 731–746.

Walters DR, Mc Roberts N and Fitt BDL (2008) Are green islands red herrings? Significance of green islands in plant interactions with pathogens and pests. Biological Reviews 83: 79–102.

Xiao S, Ellwood S, Calis O et al. (2001) Broad‐spectrum mildew resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana mediated by RPW8. Science 291: 118–120.

Yahiaoui N, Brunner S and Keller B (2006) Rapid generation of new powdery mildew resistance genes after wheat domestication. Plant Journal 47: 85–98.

Yun BW, Atkinson HA, Gaborit C et al. (2003) Loss of actin cytoskeletal function and EDS1 activity, in combination, severely compromises non‐host resistance in Arabidopsis against wheat powdery mildew. Plant Journal 34: 768–777.

Zhou FS, Kurth JC, Wei FS et al. (2001) Cell‐autonomous expression of barley Mla1 confers race‐specific resistance to the powdery mildew fungus via a Rar1‐independent signalling pathway. Plant Cell 13: 337–350.

Zhu ZD, Zhou RH, Kong XY, Dong YC and Jia JZ (2005) Microsatellite markers linked to 2 powdery mildew resistance genes introgressed from Triticum carthlicum accession PS5 into common wheat. Genome 48: 585–590.

Further Reading

Bélanger RR, Bushnell WR, Dik AJ and Carver TLW (eds) (2002) The Powdery Mildews: A Comprehensive Treatise. St. Paul, MN. This detailed book provides a thorough review of all aspects of powdery mildew biology, epidemiology and control. American Phytopathological Society.

Brown JKM (1994) Chance and selection in the evolution of barley mildew. Trends in Microbiology 2: 470–475.

Cherewick WJ (1944) Studies on the biology of Erysiphe graminis DC. Canadian Journal of Research 22: 52–86. Interesting historic paper that is as valid today as it was when first published.

Eichmann R and Huckelhoven R (2008) Accommodation of powdery mildew fungi in intact plant cells. Journal of Plant Physiology 165(1): 5–18.

O'Connell RJ and Panstruga R (2006) Tete a tete inside a plant cell: establishing compatibility between plants and biotrophic fungi and oomycetes. New Phytologist 171(4): 699–718.

Shirasu K and Schulze‐Lefert P (2000) Regulators of cell death in disease resistance. Plant Molecular Biology 44: 371–385 This review provide an overview of the functioning of molecular chaperones in resistance protein function.

Thordal‐Christensen H, Zhang ZG, Wei YD and Collinge DB (1997) Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley–powdery mildew interaction. Plant Journal 11: 1187–1194.

Zhang Z, Henderson C, Perfect E et al. (2005) Of genes and genomes, needles and haystacks: Blumeria graminis and functionality. Molecular Plant Pathology 6(5): 561–575.

Web Links

Blumeria graminis sequencing project website. http://www.blugen.org/. For access to the genome sequence and stage‐specific cDNA sequence libraries.

Home Grown Cereals Authority, UK. www.hgca.com. Provides current information about the control of powdery mildew, and a link to the encyclopedia of Cereal Diseases.

Plant Disease Control: Oregon State University. http://plant‐disease.ippc.orst.edu/index.cfm. This searchable website provides detail on the symptoms and control of powdery mildews in North America.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Ridout, Christopher James(Sep 2009) Powdery Mildews. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021263]