Spinal Cord: Repair and Rehabilitation

Functional deficits following spinal cord injury are no longer viewed as totally irreversible. Laboratory findings indicate the ability to walk can be partially restored by individual or combined therapeutic approaches targeting specific cellular responses to trauma. In addition, certain rehabilitation strategies can enhance ambulatory capacity, as well as stimulate certain intrinsic cellular or molecular repair processes. Other findings indicate the spinal cord is not as ‘hard-wired’ as previously believed, and that neural circuitries in the injured spinal cord undergo natural remodelling with some changes appearing to facilitate some improvements in function over time. These collective observations highlight intriguing opportunities for achieving better functional outcomes and quality of life by interfacing cellular and molecular treatments with rehabilitation techniques that can amplify natural or therapeutically directed repair mechanisms. Whereas challenges remain, interactive training/exercise is becoming recognized as a fundamental adjunct to a growing list of potential therapeutic interventions for promoting spinal cord regeneration and neuroplasticity.

Keywords: neuroplasticity; locomotor training; rehabilitation; spinal cord injury; spinal cord repair

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a spinal cord contusion injury describing white matter (highlighted in red) injury. Some of the events of spinal cord injury that contribute to white matter damage (A–G) are: (A) loss of myelin (primary demyelination), which impedes normal axonal function; (B) disruption of axons which results in degeneration and retraction of the axonal stump, both proximal and distal to the injury site; (C) an increase in ‘inhibitory’ molecules following injury (e.g. associated with myelin degradation or ‘glial scarring’) that prevent axonal growth (sprouting/regeneration); (D) activation of glial cells, which contributes to formation of a glial scar around the injury site that acts as a physical and molecular barrier to axonal growth and (E) disruption of blood vessels that supply the spinal cord. This disruption not only impedes delivery of oxygen (i.e. causes ischaemia) but also results in bleeding (F – red blood cells and G – white blood cells) into the spinal cord tissue, contributing to secondary tissue damage. Treatment approaches to improve white matter repair include (i) limiting the effect of demyelination and promotion of ‘remyelination’ by delivery of myelin precursor cells; (ii) cell transplantation as a means of ‘bridging’ the injury site and providing a substrate that is more permissive to axonal growth and/or regeneration; (iii) delivery of growth-promoting factors (trophic factors) into the injured spinal cord to enhance the axonal ability for growth; (iv) attenuation of the inhibitory affects of some injury-related molecules (e.g. delivery of drugs that block inhibitory myelin-associated molecules provide an environment that is more permissive to axonal growth/regeneration) and (v) delivery of anti-inflammatory agents to regulate the immune response following spinal injury and limit any potentially harmful affects.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a spinal contusion injury demonstrating cell transplantation as a treatment for grey matter (neuronal) damage. In addition to axonal damage there is extensive neuronal (motoneuron and interneuron) loss as a result of trauma and subsequent degenerative processes (a). Transplantation of immature cells capable of becoming neurons offers potential for replacing those neurons lost after injury (b). The newly transplanted cells may form connections with neurons of the injured spinal cord (around or below the injury site), thereby forming what would represent a novel relay circuit (c).
Figure 3. Descending supraspinal (originating from the brainstem or brain) axons innervate interneurons and motoneurons on both sides of the spinal cord (a). Spinal cord injury results in disruption of these descending axons (demonstrated by a partial lesion in (b)). Following partial spinal cord injury, new, alternative pathways can spontaneously develop over time. This form of neuroplasticity can arise due to new growth or ‘sprouting’ of injured axons (c) onto interneurons that in turn form connections with neurons below the lesion, thereby forming an alternative pathway. Similarly, uninjured axons (spared by the injury) can undergo ‘sprouting’ to form alternative pathways (d). Such alternative pathways may serve to compensate for the original circuit lost due to injury.
Figure 4. Images showing the progression of locomotor training in an individual with incomplete spinal cord injury: (a) Retraining stepping and balance on the treadmill – partial body support environment with trainers manually assisting limb/trunk movements. (b) Translation of skills learned in the treadmill environment to assisted walking over ground. (c) Translation of locomotor skills developed to self-assisted walking within the community.
close
 Further Reading
    book Barbeau H and Blunt R (1991) "A novel interactive locomotor approach using body weight support to retrain gate in spastic paretic subjects". In: Wernig A (ed.) Plasticity of Motoneuronal Connections. Restorative Neurology, vol. 5, pp. 461–474. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Beaumont E, Houle JD, Peterson CA and Gardiner PF (2004) Passive exercise and fetal spinal cord transplant both help to restore motoneuronal properties after spinal cord transection in rats. Muscle Nerve 29(2): 234–242.
    Behrman AL, Nair PM, Bowden MG et al. (2008) Locomotor training restores walking in a nonambulatory child with chronic, severe, incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Physical Therapy 88: 580–590.
    Courtine G, Song B, Roy RR et al. (2008) Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury. Nature Medicine 14: 69–74.
    Dunlop SA (2008) Activity-dependent plasticity: implications for recovery after spinal cord injury. Trends in Neurosciences 31(8): 410–418.
    Edgerton VR, Courtine G, Gerasimenko YP et al. (2008) Training locomotor networks. Brain Research Reviews 57: 241–254.
    book Patterson MM and Grau JW (eds) (2001) Spinal Cord Plasticity: Alterations in Reflex Function. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Reier PJ (2004) Cellular transplantation strategies for spinal cord injury and translational neurobiology. NeuroRx 1: 424–451.
    book Reier PJ and Lane MA (2008) "Degeneration, regeneration and plasticity in the nervous system". In: Conn PM (ed.) Neuroscience in Medicine, 3rd edn, pp. 691–727. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
    Teng YD, Liao WL, Choi H et al. (2006) Physical activity-mediated functional recovery after spinal cord injury: potential roles of neural stem cells. Regenerative Medicine 1: 763–776.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Reier, Paul J, Lane, Michael A, Behrman, Andrea L, and Howland, Dena R(Mar 2009) Spinal Cord: Repair and Rehabilitation. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021403]