SUMOylation

SUMOs are Small Ubiquitin-like MOdifier proteins that are covalently attached to hundreds of known target proteins to regulate their function. SUMOylation is the process of conjugating SUMOs to target proteins via E1, E2 and E3 enzymes and occurs mostly at specific SUMOylation consensus sites in targets. SUMOylation is a reversible process; SUMO-specific proteases remove SUMOs from target proteins. It has been established that reversible protein SUMOylation is critical for eukaryotic life. A wide variety of cellular processes are regulated by SUMOylation including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) metabolism, transport, ribosome biogenesis and translation. Proteins can also associate with SUMO noncovalently via SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs). This affects target protein function and can also affect the subcellular localization of target proteins. Similar to ubiquitin, SUMOs can form polymers via internal SUMOylation sites. Crosstalk between SUMOylation and other posttranslational modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation and ubiquitination is required for appropriate control of target protein activity.

Key concepts:

  • SUMOs are Small Ubiquitin-like MOdifiers that are covalently attached to lysines in target proteins.
  • SUMOylation, the process of SUMO conjugation to a target protein, frequently occurs on a lysine situated in a SUMOylation consensus site.
  • Conjugated SUMOs can be removed from target proteins by SUMO-specific proteases.
  • Vertebrates express three different SUMO isoforms, SUMO-1, SUMO-2 and SUMO-3, encoded by three different genes.
  • SUMOs can form polymers via internal SUMOylation sites in SUMO-2 and SUMO-3.
  • Several proteins can bind noncovalently to SUMOs via SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs).
  • A finely balanced SUMOylation/deSUMOylation system is required for eukaryotic life.
  • Crosstalk between SUMOylation and other posttranslational modifications like acetylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitination, is important for full control of target protein activity.

Keywords: SUMO; ubiquitin; SENP; posttranslational modification

Figure 1. The SUMOylation machinery. SUMO (S) precursor proteins are cleaved by SUMO-specific proteases (SENPs). The mature SUMO protein can be conjugated to target substrates via an E1, E2 and E3 enzymatic cascade. SUMOylation is a reversible process; SENPs can deconjugate SUMO-modified substrates. SUMOylation can affect the interaction of a target substrate with a binding protein in different ways. For example, SUMOylation can enhance the interaction by noncovalent binding to a SUMO interacting motif (SIM) located in a binding protein. SUMO can also inhibit binding between two proteins by masking a binding domain (BD) on the SUMOylated protein. A target substrate can be modified by a single SUMO monomer, multiple SUMO monomers or by SUMO chains.
close
 References
    Alkuraya FS, Saadi I, Lund JJ et al. (2006) SUMO1 haploinsufficiency leads to cleft lip and palate. Science 313: 1751.
    Anckar J and Sistonen L (2007) SUMO: getting it on. Biochemical Social Transaction 35: 1409–1413.
    Bernier-Villamor V, Sampson DA, Matunis MJ and Lima CD (2002) Structural basis for E2-mediated SUMO conjugation revealed by a complex between ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and RanGAP1. Cell 108: 345–356.
    Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G et al. (2006) Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509–522.
    Cheng CH, Lo YH, Liang SS et al. (2006) SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes and Development 20: 2067–2081.
    Cheng J, Kang X, Zhang S and Yeh ET (2007) SUMO-specific protease 1 is essential for stabilization of HIF1alpha during hypoxia. Cell 131: 584–595.
    Chiu SY, Asai N, Costantini F and Hsu W (2008) SUMO-specific protease 2 is essential for modulating p53-Mdm2 in development of trophoblast stem cell niches and lineages. PLoS Biology 6: e310.
    Dawlaty MM, Malureanu L, Jeganathan KB et al. (2008) Resolution of sister centromeres requires RanBP2-mediated SUMOylation of topoisomerase IIalpha. Cell 133: 103–115.
    Desterro JM, Rodriguez MS and Hay RT (1998) SUMO-1 modification of IkappaBalpha inhibits NF-kappaB activation. Molecular Cell 2: 233–239.
    Desterro JM, Rodriguez MS, Kemp GD and Hay RT (1999) Identification of the enzyme required for activation of the small ubiquitin-like protein SUMO-1. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 10618–10624.
    Desterro JM, Thomson J and Hay RT (1997) Ubch9 conjugates SUMO but not ubiquitin. FEBS Letters 417: 297–300.
    Evdokimov E, Sharma P, Lockett SJ, Lualdi M and Kuehn MR (2008) Loss of SUMO1 in mice affects RanGAP1 localization and formation of PML nuclear bodies, but is not lethal as it can be compensated by SUMO2 or SUMO3. Journal of Cell Science 121: 4106–4113.
    Gill G (2005) Something about SUMO inhibits transcription. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 15: 536–541.
    Hietakangas V, Anckar J, Blomster HA et al. (2006) PDSM, a motif for phosphorylation-dependent SUMO modification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 45–50.
    Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G and Jentsch S (2002) RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135–141.
    Huang TT, Wuerzberger-Davis SM, Wu ZH and Miyamoto S (2003) Sequential modification of NEMO/IKKgamma by SUMO-1 and ubiquitin mediates NF-kappaB activation by genotoxic stress. Cell 115: 565–576.
    Johnson ES and Blobel G (1997a) Ubc9p is the conjugating enzyme for the ubiquitin-like protein Smt3p. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272: 26799–26802.
    Johnson ES and Gupta AA (2001) An E3-like factor that promotes SUMO conjugation to the yeast septins. Cell 106: 735–744.
    Johnson ES, Schwienhorst I, Dohmen RJ and Blobel G (1997b) The ubiquitin-like protein Smt3p is activated for conjugation to other proteins by an Aos1p/Uba2p heterodimer. EMBO Journal 16: 5509–5519.
    Kerscher O, Felberbaum R and Hochstrasser M (2006) Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 22: 159–180.
    Knipscheer P, Flotho A, Klug H et al. (2008) Ubc9 sumoylation regulates SUMO target discrimination. Molecular Cell 31: 371–382.
    Lallemand-Breitenbach V, Jeanne M, Benhenda S et al. (2008) Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nature Cell Biology 10: 547–555.
    Li SJ and Hochstrasser M (1999) A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature 398: 246–251.
    Lin DY, Huang YS, Jeng JC et al. (2006) Role of SUMO-interacting motif in Daxx SUMO modification, subnuclear localization, and repression of sumoylated transcription factors. Molecular Cell 24: 341–354.
    Lois LM and Lima CD (2005) Structures of the SUMO E1 provide mechanistic insights into SUMO activation and E2 recruitment to E1. EMBO Journal 24: 439–451.
    Mahajan R, Delphin C, Guan T, Gerace L and Melchior F (1997) A small ubiquitin-related polypeptide involved in targeting RanGAP1 to nuclear pore complex protein RanBP2. Cell 88: 97–107.
    Matic I, van Hagen M, Schimmel J et al. (2008) In vivo identification of human small ubiquitin-like modifier polymerization sites by high accuracy mass spectrometry and an in vitro to in vivo strategy. Molecular Cell Proteomics 7: 132–144.
    Matunis MJ, Coutavas E and Blobel G (1996) A novel ubiquitin-like modification modulates the partitioning of the Ran-GTPase-activating protein RanGAP1 between the cytosol and the nuclear pore complex. Journal of Cell Biology 135: 1457–1470.
    Matunis MJ, Zhang XD and Ellis NA (2006) SUMO: the glue that binds. Developmental Cell 11: 596–597.
    Nacerddine K, Lehembre F, Bhaumik M et al. (2005) The SUMO pathway is essential for nuclear integrity and chromosome segregation in mice. Developmental Cell 9: 769–779.
    Palvimo JJ (2007) PIAS proteins as regulators of small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) modifications and transcription. Biochemical Social Transactions 35: 1405–1408.
    Papouli E, Chen S, Davies AA et al. (2005) Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Molecular Cell 19: 123–133.
    Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Sacher M, Hoege C and Jentsch S (2005) SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436: 428–433.
    Pichler A, Gast A, Seeler JS, Dejean A and Melchior F (2002) The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell 108: 109–120.
    Potts PR (2009) The Yin and Yang of the MMS21-SMC5/6 SUMO ligase complex in homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 8: 499–506.
    Prudden J, Pebernard S, Raffa G et al. (2007) SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO Journal 26: 4089–4101.
    Rodriguez MS, Dargemont C and Hay RT (2001) SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276: 12654–12659.
    Roukens MG, Ioul-Ramdhani M, Vertegaal AC et al. (2008) Identification of a new site of sumoylation on Tel (ETV6) uncovers a PIAS-dependent mode of regulating Tel function. Molecular Cell Biology 28: 2342–2357.
    Sachdev S, Bruhn L, Sieber H et al. (2001) PIASy, a nuclear matrix-associated SUMO E3 ligase, represses LEF1 activity by sequestration into nuclear bodies. Genes and Development 15: 3088–3103.
    Schimmel J, Larsen KM, Matic I et al. (2008) The ubiquitin-proteasome system is a key component of the SUMO-2/3 cycle. Molecular Cell Proteomics 7: 2107–2122.
    Sharrocks AD (2006) PIAS proteins and transcriptional regulation – more than just SUMO E3 ligases? Genes and Development 20: 754–758.
    Stelter P and Ulrich HD (2003) Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425: 188–191.
    Sun H, Leverson JD and Hunter T (2007) Conserved function of RNF4 family proteins in eukaryotes: targeting a ubiquitin ligase to SUMOylated proteins. EMBO Journal 26: 4102–4112.
    Tatham MH, Geoffroy MC, Shen L et al. (2008) RNF4 is a poly SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nature Cell Biology 10: 538–546.
    Wotton D and Merrill JC (2007) Pc2 and SUMOylation. Biochemical Social Transaction 35: 1401–1404.
    Yamaguchi T, Sharma P, Athanasiou M et al. (2005) Mutation of SENP1/SuPr-2 reveals an essential role for desumoylation in mouse development. Molecular Cell Biology 25: 5171–5182.
    Yang SH and Sharrocks AD (2004) SUMO promotes HDAC-mediated transcriptional repression. Molecular Cell 13: 611–617.
    Yang SH, Galanis A, Witty J and Sharrocks AD (2006) An extended consensus motif enhances the specificity of substrate modification by SUMO. EMBO Journal 25: 5083–5093.
    Zhang FP, Mikkonen L, Toppari J et al. (2008) Sumo-1 function is dispensable in normal mouse development. Molecular Cell Biology 28: 5381–5390.
    Zhao X and Blobel G (2005) A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102: 4777–4782.
 Further Reading
    Bergink S and Jentsch S (2009) Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair. Nature 458: 461–467.
    Geiss-Friedlander R and Melchior F (2007) Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nature Reviews of Molecular Cell Biology 8: 947–956.
    Meulmeester E and Melchior F (2008) Cell biology: SUMO. Nature 452: 709–711.
    Mukhopadhyay D and Dasso M (2007) Modification in reverse: the SUMO proteases. Trends in Biochemical Science 32: 286–295.
    Perry JJ, Tainer JA and Boddy MN (2008) A SIM-ultaneous role for SUMO and ubiquitin. Trends in Biochemical Science 33: 201–208.
    Ulrich HD (2008) The fast-growing business of SUMO chains. Molecular Cell 32: 301–305.
    Ulrich HD (2009) The SUMO system: an overview. Methods in Molecular Biology 497: 3–16.
    Vertegaal AC (2007) Small ubiquitin-related modifiers in chains. Biochemical Social Transactions 35: 1422–1423.
    Wilson VG and Heaton PR (2008) Ubiquitin proteolytic system: focus on SUMO. Expert Reviews of Proteomics 5: 121–135.
    Yeh ET (2009) SUMOylation and de-SUMOylation: wrestling with life's processes. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284: 8223–8227.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Schimmel, Joost, and Vertegaal, Alfred CO(Dec 2009) SUMOylation. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021849]