Cytoskeleton in Axon Growth

During development, neurons extend two different types of processes, typically several short dendrites and one long axon. The axon forms synapses with dendrites of other neurons to integrate into a neuronal network. Axons can extend to enormous lengths. Their growth is guided and exactly controlled to guarantee the correct neuronal connections. Microtubules and actin filaments, the two major cytoskeletal elements, are the key players in these processes. They form the backbone for axon extension, provide the construction material for axon elongation, and are the site of convergence of extracellular and intrinsic signals. Correct path finding of the axon is ensured by a specialized and highly dynamic structure at the tip of the growing axon, the growth cone. Its dynamic cytoskeleton is the machinery that establishes, controls and directs axon growth. Overall, the cytoskeleton determines the distinction of axons and dendrites and aberrant changes in the cytoskeleton are a major cause of regenerative failure after spinal cord injury.

Key concepts:

  • The growth cone is the highly motile tip of a growing axon, where the axon becomes elongated.
  • Growth cone motility is regulated by cytoskeletal dynamics.
  • Actin filaments determine growth cone shape and are involved in path finding.
  • Microtubules give structure to the axon shaft and are essential for axon elongation.
  • Guidance cues act on the cytoskeleton in the growth cone.
  • A dynamic interaction between actin filaments and microtubules is necessary to steer axon growth.
  • The cytoskeleton regulates neuronal polarity.
  • Injury induced pathological changes of the cytoskeleton are a major cause for lack of regeneration after spinal cord injury.

Keywords: neuron; axon growth; growth cone; cytoskeleton; actin filaments; microtubules

Figure 1. The growth cone. (a) Growth cone of a hippocampal neuron. The actin cytoskeleton is visualized by fluorescently labelled phalloidin (red). Microtubules are stained with antibodies against tubulin (green). The peripheral domain of the growth cone shows the typical actin bundles while microtubules dominate the central domain of the growth cone and the axon shaft. Scale bar, 10 m. (b) Schematic diagram of a growth cone. The growth cone can be divided into three domains: The peripheral domain (P-domain) comprises of the finger-like filopodia that are separated by membrane veils called lamellipodia. Filopodia are formed by F-actin bundles while lamellipodia are based on an F-actin meshwork. The central domain (C-domain) is filled with microtubules that enter the growth cone bundled from the axon shaft. Single, dynamic microtubules explore the peripheral domain. In between the P- and C-domain lies the transition zone (T-zone). Here, actin–myosin structures form F-actin arcs that surround the C-domain and are perpendicular to the F-actin bundles.
Figure 2. Stages of axon growth. The process of axon growth can be divided into three different steps. (a) Protrusion: Actin filament polymerization is enhanced at the leading edge. This leads to extension of filopodia and lamellipodia. Actin clears from the corridor between the P- and C-domain. (b) Engorgement: Microtubules of the C-domain invade the free corridor towards the site of new growth. Through the forward movement of the C-domain, this region also becomes enriched with vesicles and organelles. (c) Consolidation: In the last step, microtubules become bundled and actin protrusion becomes repressed in the proximal part of the growth cone. Thereby, the proximal part assumes cylindrical shape and is integrated in the axon shaft.
Figure 3. Dynamics of actin filaments. Actin filaments grow by adding ATP-actin (red) to the barbed end, which faces the distal membrane in the growth cone. ADP-actin (green) becomes disassembled from the filament at the pointed end that faces the T-zone. Polymerization at the distal membrane and depolymerization in the T-zone lead to treadmilling of F-actin. ADP-actin becomes recycled to ATP-actin and can be used again for polymerization. Actin-binding proteins (ABPs) regulate these dynamics by either promoting polymerization like Ena/Vasp proteins or by severing and depolymerizing F-actin like ADF/cofilin. Furthermore, ABPs can organize the actin filaments into higher order structures, for example, by bundling through proteins like fascin.
Figure 4. Dynamics of microtubules. Microtubules are intrinsically dynamic. The polymers rapidly switch from a shrinking mode to a growing mode (rescue) or the reverse way (catastrophe). Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) regulate microtubule dynamics. For instance, CRMP-2 and plus-end tracking proteins (+TIPs) promote microtubule assembly. In contrast, SCG10 and stathmin destabilize microtubules. Furthermore, proteins like katanin or spastin sever microtubules and are therefore important in axon growth and branching.
Figure 5. The role of the cytoskeleton in neuronal polarity. At the beginning of neuronal development, a neuron has several equal processes. During neuronal polarization, intracellular signalling pathways change the cytoskeleton in one of these processes, the future axon. The actin cytoskeleton in the growth cone becomes more dynamic and thus, actin filaments do not function anymore as a barrier to protruding microtubules. Thus, the growth cone can advance and the axon forms. At the same time, microtubules are stabilized in the axon. These stable microtubules may serve as tracks for specific axonal transport and promote further axonal and somatodendritic segregation. In the nongrowing processes, the actin filaments form a rigid barrier in the growth cone that prevents the protrusion of microtubules into the peripheral domain. Thus, this actin barrier inhibits the growth of the other processes, the future dendrites.
close
 References
    Akhmanova A and Steinmetz MO (2008) Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 9: 309–322.
    Arimura N and Kaibuchi K (2007) Neuronal polarity: from extracellular signals to intracellular mechanisms. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 8: 194–205.
    Baas PW, Karabay A and Qiang L (2005) Microtubules cut and run. Trends in Cell Biology 15: 518–524.
    Barnes AP, Solecki D and Polleux F (2008) New insights into the molecular mechanisms specifying neuronal polarity in vivo. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18: 44–52.
    Bradke F and Dotti CG (1997) Neuronal polarity: vectorial cytoplasmic flow precedes axon formation. Neuron 19: 1175–1186.
    Bradke F and Dotti CG (1999) The role of local actin instability in axon formation. Science 283: 1931–1934.
    Buck KB and Zheng JQ (2002) Growth cone turning induced by direct local modification of microtubule dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience 22: 9358–9367.
    Dehmelt L and Halpain S (2004) Actin and microtubules in neurite initiation: are MAPs the missing link? Journal of Neurobiology 58: 18–33.
    Dent EW and Gertler FB (2003) Cytoskeletal dynamics and transport in growth cone motility and axon guidance. Neuron 40: 209–227.
    Erturk A, Hellal F, Enes J and Bradke F (2007) Disorganized microtubules underlie the formation of retraction bulbs and the failure of axonal regeneration. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 9169–9180.
    Eyer J and Peterson A (1994) Neurofilament-deficient axons and perikaryal aggregates in viable transgenic mice expressing a neurofilament-beta-galactosidase fusion protein. Neuron 12: 389–405.
    Fukata Y, Itoh TJ, Kimura T et al. (2002) CRMP-2 binds to tubulin heterodimers to promote microtubule assembly. Nature Cell Biology 4: 583–591.
    Garvalov BK, Flynn KC, Neukirchen D et al. (2007) Cdc42 regulates cofilin during the establishment of neuronal polarity. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 13117–13129.
    Goldberg DJ and Burmeister DW (1986) Stages in axon formation: observations of growth of Aplysia axons in culture using video-enhanced contrast-differential interference contrast microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 103: 1921–1931.
    Gordon-Weeks PR (2004) Microtubules and growth cone function. Journal of Neurobiology 58: 70–83.
    Govek EE, Newey SE and Van Aelst L (2005) The role of the Rho GTPases in neuronal development. Genes & Development 19: 1–49.
    Grabham PW, Seale GE, Bennecib M, Goldberg DJ and Vallee RB (2007) Cytoplasmic dynein and LIS1 are required for microtubule advance during growth cone remodeling and fast axonal outgrowth. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 5823–5834.
    Grenningloh G, Soehrman S, Bondallaz P, Ruchti E and Cadas H (2004) Role of the microtubule destabilizing proteins SCG10 and stathmin in neuronal growth. Journal of Neurobiology 58: 60–69.
    Ishikawa R and Kohama K (2007) Actin-binding proteins in nerve cell growth cones. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences 105: 6–11.
    Jacobson C, Schnapp B and Banker GA (2006) A change in the selective translocation of the Kinesin-1 motor domain marks the initial specification of the axon. Neuron 49: 797–804.
    Kawano Y, Yoshimura T, Tsuboi D et al. (2005) CRMP-2 is involved in kinesin-1-dependent transport of the Sra-1/WAVE1 complex and axon formation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 25: 9920–9935.
    Kimura T, Watanabe H, Iwamatsu A and Kaibuchi K (2005) Tubulin and CRMP-2 complex is transported via Kinesin-1. Journal of Neurochemistry 93: 1371–1382.
    Koester MP, Muller O and Pollerberg GE (2007) Adenomatous polyposis coli is differentially distributed in growth cones and modulates their steering. Journal of Neuroscience 27: 12590–12600.
    Konishi Y and Setou M (2009) Tubulin tyrosination navigates the kinesin-1 motor domain to axons. Nature Neuroscience 12: 559–567.
    Kwiatkowski AV, Rubinson DA, Dent EW et al. (2007) Ena/VASP is required for neuritogenesis in the developing cortex. Neuron 56: 441–455.
    Lee AC and Suter DM (2008) Quantitative analysis of microtubule dynamics during adhesion-mediated growth cone guidance. Developmental Neurobiology 68: 1363–1377.
    Lu M, Witke W, Kwiatkowski DJ and Kosik KS (1997) Delayed retraction of filopodia in gelsolin null mice. Journal of Cell Biology 138: 1279–1287.
    Ma Y, Shakiryanova D, Vardya I and Popov SV (2004) Quantitative analysis of microtubule transport in growing nerve processes. Current Biology 14: 725–730.
    Marsh L and Letourneau PC (1984) Growth of neurites without filopodial or lamellipodial activity in the presence of cytochalasin B. Journal of Cell Biology 99: 2041–2047.
    Medeiros NA, Burnette DT and Forscher P (2006) Myosin II functions in actin-bundle turnover in neuronal growth cones. Nature Cell Biology 8: 215–226.
    Mitchison T and Kirschner M (1988) Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth. Neuron 1: 761–772.
    Nakata T and Hirokawa N (2003) Microtubules provide directional cues for polarized axonal transport through interaction with kinesin motor head. Journal of Cell Biology 162: 1045–1055.
    Ramon y Cajal (1890) À quelle époque apparaissent les expansions des cellules nerveuses de la moëlle épinière du poulet? Anatomomischer Anzeiger 5: 609–613, 631–639.
    Reed NA, Cai D, Blasius TL et al. (2006) Microtubule acetylation promotes kinesin-1 binding and transport. Current Biology 16: 2166–2172.
    Schaefer AW, Schoonderwoert VT, Ji L et al. (2008) Coordination of actin filament and microtubule dynamics during neurite outgrowth. Developmental Cell 15: 146–162.
    Suter DM and Forscher P (2000) Substrate-cytoskeletal coupling as a mechanism for the regulation of growth cone motility and guidance. Journal of Neurobiology 44: 97–113.
    Terada S, Kinjo M and Hirokawa N (2000) Oligomeric tubulin in large transporting complex is transported via kinesin in squid giant axons. Cell 103: 141–155.
    Watabe-Uchida M, John KA, Janas JA, Newey SE and Van Aelst L (2006) The Rac activator DOCK7 regulates neuronal polarity through local phosphorylation of stathmin/Op18. Neuron 51: 727–739.
    Witke W (2004) The role of profilin complexes in cell motility and other cellular processes. Trends in Cell Biology 14: 461–469.
    Witte H and Bradke F (2008) The role of the cytoskeleton during neuronal polarization. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18: 479–487.
    Witte H, Neukirchen D and Bradke F (2008) Microtubule stabilization specifies initial neuronal polarization. Journal of Cell Biology 180: 619–632.
    Yamada KM, Spooner BS and Wessells NK (1970) Axon growth: roles of microfilaments and microtubules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 66: 1206–1212.
    Yamada KM, Spooner BS and Wessells NK (1971) Ultrastructure and function of growth cones and axons of cultured nerve cells. Journal of Cell Biology 49: 614–635.
    Yu W, Qiang L, Solowska JM et al. (2008) The microtubule-severing proteins spastin and katanin participate differently in the formation of axonal branches. Molecular and Cellular Biology 19: 1485–1498.
    Zhou FQ and Cohan CS (2004) How actin filaments and microtubules steer growth cones to their targets. Journal of Neurobiology 58: 84–91.
    Ziv NE and Spira ME (1998) Induction of growth cone formation by transient and localized increases of intracellular proteolytic activity. Journal of Cell Biology 140: 223–232.
 Further Reading
    Barnes AP and Polleux F (2009) Establishment of axon-dendrite polarity in developing neurons. Annual Review of Neuroscience 32: 347–381.
    Conde C and Caceres A (2009) Microtubule assembly, organization and dynamics in axons and dendrites. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 10: 319–332.
    Lowery LA and Van Vactor D (2009) The trip of the tip: understanding the growth cone machinery. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 10: 332–343.
    Pak CW, Flynn KC and Bamburg JR (2008) Actin-binding proteins take the reins in growth cones. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 9: 136–147.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Stiess, Michael, and Bradke, Frank(Dec 2009) Cytoskeleton in Axon Growth. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021855]