Parental Care and Investment

Parental care is common throughout the animal kingdom and among caring species there is a bewildering variation in how parents care for offspring, as well as in the amount of resources parents invest in care. For instance, there is considerable variation in the relative parental investment by the sexes – in some species females invest more, in others males invest more, and in some investment is more or less equally shared. Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain patterns of parental investment between the sexes, as well as among species, and work is still ongoing to develop an overarching hypothesis that can explain the various patterns observed.

Key concepts:

  • Among species there is ample variation in how parents care for their offspring, if at all, as well as in how much they invest in offspring.
  • Differences between the sexes in relative parental investment have been recently proposed to depend on sexual selection and the operational sex ratio, rather than sexual selection patterns resulting from relative parental investment by the sexes, as previously suggested.
  • Individual decisions on the optimal parental investment can lead to conflict between parents as well as between parents and the offspring.
  • In some species, care of the offspring is not the exclusive responsibility of the parents but is shared among members of a group, termed cooperative breeding. In other species, adults sometimes take care of unrelated offspring, either willingly (as in adoptions) or unwillingly (as in brood parasitism).
  • Within species, parents may adjust the amount of investment in offspring based on signals from their partner or from the offspring themselves.

Keywords: parental investment; sexual selection; mating system; parent–offspring conflict

Figure 1. Alternative evolutionary paths from a state of biparental care and moderate sexual selection to a state of uniparental care (in this example, female only care) and intense sexual selection acting on the noncaring sex. The first evolutionary path ((a)–(c)) involves initially a transition in the type of care, from biparental to uniparental, followed by a transition in the intensity of sexual selection acting on the noncaring sex. This follows what would be predicted by the parental investment hypothesis. The second evolutionary path ((d)–(f)) conversely, predicts first a transition in the intensity of sexual selection acting on one sex, followed by a transition in the care-type. This follows what would be predicted by the sexual selection hypothesis.
close
 Further Reading
    book Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Gonzalez-Voyer A, Fitzpatrick JL and Kolm N (2008) Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes. Evolution 62: 2015–2026.
    Kokko H and Jennions MD (2008) Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 919–948.
    book Trivers RL (1972) "Parental investment and sexual selection". In: Campbell EBG (ed.) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, pp. 136–179. Chicago: Aldine.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Gonzalez‐Voyer, Alejandro, and Kolm, Niclas(Feb 2010) Parental Care and Investment. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021907]