Regeneration in Annelids

Annelids, like many other invertebrate animals, replace lost body parts in a process called regeneration. However, the ability to regenerate lost segments is present in some groups and not others, for example leeches do not regenerate lost segments. Anterior and posterior regeneration involves the formation of a bud containing stem cells that differentiate into the new head or tail segments. Annelid regeneration also involves remodelling of surviving body fragments. The ability of annelids to regenerate tail segments appears to be nearly universal among species capable of regeneration. The ability to regenerate head segments, although common, is not universal and can depend on the number of segments lost. The absence and presence of regeneration across annelid groups, including closely related species, suggests that regeneration ability may be an ancient trait that has been lost in some species during annelid evolution. Why regeneration varies among annelid species remains an intriguing question for life scientists.

Key Concepts:

  • Annelids vary in their capability for regenerating body segments, including among closely related species.
  • The ability of annelids to regenerate posterior segments appears to be nearly universal.
  • The ability of annelids to regenerate anterior segments, although common, is not universal and is often limited depending on the number of segments lost.
  • Annelid regeneration may involve both epimorphic and morphallactic mechanisms.
  • Multiple losses and gains of regeneration ability have likely occurred during annelid evolution.
  • Why regenerative ability among annelids varies extensively remains unclear.

Keywords: annelid; polychaete; oligochaete; leech; regeneration; epimorphosis; morphallaxis; segment; nervous system; evolution

Figure 1. Phylogenetic variation in annelid segmental regeneration. Annelids are thought to have evolved from a burrowing marine ancestor that likely was able to regenerate lost body parts. During annelid evolution, the ability to regenerate, particularly head segments, has been lost (and possibly gained) in several groups. Hirudinids (leeches) and the closely related Branchiobdellida cannot regenerate lost segments, whereas many polychaetes and oligochaetes do so readily. Genera names in red (*) indicate annelid groups that contain species unable to regenerate lost heads. Genera names in green indicate annelid groups that contain species that can regenerate these lost anterior body segments.
Figure 2. Regeneration in the oligochaete worm Lumbriculus variegatus. Following injury and wound healing, a blastema is formed on both the anterior and posterior ends of the fragment. Over a two-week period, head and tail buds are generated from blastema-derived stem cells in a regenerative process called epimorphosis. Concurrently, tissues of the original body segments undergo a reorganisation of their physiology and anatomy, in the absence of new stem cell differentiation, in a regenerative process called morphallaxis. Anterior epimorphosis in this species produces a head of only 7–8 segments. Thus, segments of the posterior fragment isolated from the injured animal on the left become anterior segments of the new animal on the right.
close
 References
    Agata K, Saito Y and Nakajima E (2007) Unifying principles of regeneration I: epimorphosis versus morphallaxis. Development, Growth and Differentiation 49: 73–78.
    Bely AE (1999) Decoupling of fission and regeneration capabilities in an asexual oligochaete. Hydrobiologia 406: 243–251.
    Bely AE (2006) Distribution of segment regeneration ability in the Annelida. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46: 508–518.
    Bely AE and Nyberg KG (2010) Evolution of animal regeneration: re-emergence of a field. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 161–170.
    Bely AE and Sikes JM (2010) Latent regeneration abilities persist following recent evolutionary loss in asexual annelids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 1464–1469.
    Bely AE and Wray GA (2001) Evolution of regeneration and fission in annelids: insights from engrailed- and orthodonticle-class gene expression. Development 128: 2781–2791.
    Berrill NJ (1928) Regeneration in the polychaete Chaetopterus variopedatus. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 15: 151–158.
    Berrill NJ (1952) Regeneration and budding in worms. Biological Review 27: 401–438.
    Berrill NJ (1978) Induced segmental organization in sabellid worms. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 47: 85–96.
    Birse SC and Bittner GD (1976) Regeneration of giant axons in earthworms. Brain Research 113: 575–581.
    Birse SC and Bittner GD (1981) Regeneration of earthworm giant axons following transection or ablation. Journal of Neurophysiology 45: 724–742.
    book Bleidorn C (2009) "Annelid phylogeny – molecular analysis with an emphasis on model annelids". In: Shain DH (ed.) Annelids in Modern Biology, pp. 13–30. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    Brinkhurst RO and Gelder SR (1989) Did the lumbriculids provide the ancestors of the branchiobdellidans, acanthobdellidans and leeches? Hydrobiologia 180: 7–15.
    book Brinkhurst RO and Jamieson BGM (1971) Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    Chapron C (1970) Study in oligochaetous Eisenia foetida of morphallaxis phenomena which are demonstrated in the previous digestive duct during cephalic regeneration. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l Academie des Sciences. D: Sciences Naturelles D270: 1362–1364.
    De Vlas J (1979) Secondary production by tail regeneration in a tidal flat population of lugworms (Arenicola marina), cropped by flatfish. The Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 13: 362–393.
    book Drewes CD (1984) "Escape reflexes in earthworms and other annelids". In: Eaton RC (ed.) Neural Mechanisms of Startle Behavior, pp. 43–91. New York: Plenum Press.
    Drewes CD and Fourtner CR (1990) Morphallaxis in an aquatic oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus: reorganization of escape reflexes in regenerating body fragments. Developmental Biology 138: 94–103.
    Drewes CD and Fourtner CR (1991) Reorganization of escape reflexes during asexual fission in an aquatic oligochaete, Dero digitata. Journal of Experimental Zoology 260: 170–180.
    Drewes CD, Vining EP and Zoran MJ (1988) Regeneration of rapid escape reflex pathways in earthworms. American Zoologist 28: 1077–1089.
    Drewes CD and Zoran MJ (1989) Neurobehavioral specializations for respiratory movements and rapid escape from predators in posterior segments of the tubificid Branchiura sowerbyi. Hydrobiologia 180: 65–71.
    book Goss RJ (1969) Principles of Regeneration. New York: Academic Press.
    Herlant-Meewis H (1964) Regeneration in annelids. Advances in Morphogenesis 4: 155–215.
    Holstein TW, Hobmayer E and Technau U (2003) An evolutionarily conserved model system of regeneration? Developmental Dynamics 226: 257–267.
    Hyman LH (1940) Aspects of regeneration in annelids. American Naturalist 74: 513–527.
    Lesiuk NM and Drewes CD (1999) Autotomy reflex in a freshwater oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus (Clitellata: Lumbriculidae). Hydrobiologia 406: 253–261.
    Lesiuk NM and Drewes CD (2001) Behavioral plasticity and central regeneration of locomotor reflexes in the freshwater oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus. I. Transection studies. Invertebrate Biology 120: 248–258.
    Lindsay SM, Jackson JL and Forest DL (2008) Morphology of anterior regeneration in two spionid polychaete species: implications for feeding efficiency. Invertebrate Biology 127: 65–79.
    Lindsay SM, Jackson JL and He SQ (2007) Anterior regeneration in the spionid Polychaetes, Dipolydora quadrilobata and Pygospio elegans. Marine Biology 150: 1162–1172.
    Martinez VG, Menger GJ III and Zoran MJ (2005) Regeneration and asexual reproduction share common molecular changes: upregualtion of a neural glycoepitope during morphallaxis in Lumbriculus. Mechanisms of Development 122: 721–732.
    Martinez VG, Reddy PK and Zoran MJ (2006) Asexual reproduction and segmental regeneration, but not morphallaxis, are inhibited by boric acid in Lumbriculus variegatus (Annelida: Clitellata: Lumbriculidae). Hydrobiologia 564: 73–86.
    book Morgan TH (1901) Regeneration. New York: Macmillan.
    Morgulis S (1907) Observations and experiments on regeneration in Lumbriculus. Journal of Experimental Zoology 4: 549–574.
    Müller MCM (2004) Nerve development, growth and differentiation during regeneration in Enchytraeus fragmentosus and Stylaria lacustris (Oligochaeta). Development Growth and Differentiation 46: 471–478.
    Myohara M (2004) Differential tissue development during embryogenesis and regeneration in an Annelid. Developmental Dynamics 231: 349–358.
    Myohara M, Niva CC and Lee JM (2006) Molecular approach to annelid regeneration: cDNA subtraction cloning reveals various novel genes that are upregulated during the large-scale regeneration of the oligochaete, Enchytraeus japonensis. Developmental Dynamics 235: 2051–2070.
    Myohara M, Yoshida-Noro C, Kobari F and Tochinai S (1999) Fragmenting oligochaete Enchytraeus japonensis: a new material for regeneration study. Development Growth Differentiation 41: 549–555.
    Rice ME (1970) Asexual reproduction in a sipunculan worm. Science 167: 1618–1620.
    Sanchez Alvarado A and Tsonis PA (2006) Bridging the regeneration gap: genetic insights from diverse animal models. Nature Reviews. Genetics 7: 873–884.
    book Schroeder PC and Hermans CO (1975) "Annelida: Polychaeta". In: Giese AC and Pearse JS (eds) Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, Vol. 3. Annelids and Echiurans, pp. 1–213. New York: Academic Press.
    Struck TH, Schult N, Kusen T et al. (2007) Annelid phylogeny and the status of Sipuncula and Echiura. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 57–68.
    Tadakoro R, Sugio M, Kutsuna J, Tochinai S and Takahashi Y (2006) Early segregation of germ and somatic lineages during gonadal regeneration in the annelid Enchytraeus japonensis. Current Biology 16: 1012–1017.
    Takeo M, Yoshida-Noro C and Tochinai S (2008) Morphallactic regeneration as revealed by region-specific gene expression in the digestive tract of Enchytraeus japonensis (Oligochaeta, Annelida). Developmental Dynamics 237: 1284–1294.
    Tettamanti G, Grimaldi A, Congiu T et al. (2005) Collagen reorganization in leech wound healing. Biology of the Cell 97: 557–568.
    Wells GP (1952) The respiratory significance of the crown in the polychaete worms Sabella and Myxicola. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 140: 7082.
    Wells GP (1966) The lugworm (Arenicola) – a study in adaptation. The Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 3: 294–313.
    Yoshida-Noro C, Myohara M, Kobari F and Tochinai S (2000) Nervous system dynamics during fragmentation and regeneration in Enchytraeus japonensis (Oligochaeta, Annelida). Development Genes and Evolution 210: 311–319.
    Zoran MJ and Drewes CD (1987) Rapid escape reflexes in aquatic oligochaetes: variations in design and function of evolutionary conserved giant fiber systems. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 161: 729–738.
    Zoran MJ and Drewes CD (1988) The rapid tail withdrawal reflex of the tubificid worm, Branchiura sowerbyi. Journal of Experimental Biology 137: 487–500.
    Zoran MJ, Drewes CD, Fourtner CR and Siegel AJ (1988) The lateral giant fibers of the tubificid worm, Branchiura sowerbyi: structural and functional asymmetry in a paired interneuronal system. Journal of Comparative Neurology 275: 76–86.
    book Zoran MJ and Martinez VG (2009) "Lumbriculus variegatus and the need for speed: a model system for studies of rapid escape, regeneration and asexual reproduction". In: Shain DH (ed.) Annelids in Modern Biology, pp. 185–202. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
 Further Reading
    book Carlson BM (2007) Principles of Regenerative Biology. London: Elsevier.
    book Dinsmore CE (1991) A History of Regeneration Research: Milestones in the Evolution of a Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    book Dinsmore CE and Mescher AL (1998) "The role of the nervous system in regeneration". In: Ferretti J and Geraudie J (eds) Cellular and Molecular Basis of Regeneration, pp. 79–108. Chichester: Wiley.
    Goss RJ (1992) The evolution of regeneration: adaptive or inherent? Journal of Theoretical Biology 159: 241–260.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Zoran, Mark J(Sep 2010) Regeneration in Annelids. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0022103]