Deconstructing Gene Function through ENU Mutagenesis


A great majority of genes present in the human genome are also present in the mouse, thus making it an attractive mammalian model organism to study gene function and dysfunction. Over the past few decades, the ability to manipulate the mouse genome has been developed in a variety of ways, including the ability to delete genes or introduce more subtle single mutations. A complementary methodology to create mutations in the mouse is to use chemical mutagenesis. N‐ethyl‐N‐nitrosourea (ENU) is the mutagen of choice for creating random point mutations throughout the genome in many model organisms. ENU mutagenesis is a powerful hypothesis‐generating approach currently being exploited to create new mouse models through both forward and reverse genetics approaches.

Key Concepts:

  • ENU produces mainly point mutations randomly throughout the genome.

  • ENU mutagenesis can be used in both forward and reverse genetics approaches.

  • ENU phenotype‐driven screens do not require previous knowledge of the gene to create new mouse models.

  • ENU phenotype‐driven screens identify new mouse models by means of phenotyping.

Keywords: ENU; ENU mutagenesis; mouse; mouse models; phenotype; genetics

Figure 1.

ENU mutations. ENU‐treated male mice produce sperm carrying unique arrays of ENU‐induced mutations. They are mated to nontreated wild‐type females producing G1 mice, each carrying a unique set of mutations. Note that as each G1 male is unique, intercrossing G1s will not produce mutations in homozygosis as each G1 carries different mutations.

Figure 2.

Dominant and recessive screens breeding schemes. G0 – male mice treated with ENU are crossed to wild‐type females. G1 – each G1 mouse carries a unique array of heterozygote ENU mutations. Dominant mutations causing phenotypes can be identified. G2 – to identify recessive mutations, a unique G1 is crossed to wild‐type females of the same inbred strain (C3H) as the female used in the previous generation. All G2 mice carry mutations from the selected G1 father. G2 females are then backcrossed to their G1 father to produce G3s, where on average one in eight individual will carry any given mutation in homozygosis. Using this breeding scheme, no homozygote mutations could be generated on the X chromosome, as the G1 male founder X chromosome must come from its wild‐type mother. Note that other recessive breeding schemes such as intercrossing G2s can also be employed. Although B6 and C3H are selected for this breeding scheme, any other inbred strains can be potentially used.

Figure 3.

Phenotype‐driven and gene‐driven screens. Both screens share the same root: an ENU‐mutagenised G0 male crossed with a nonmutagenised female producing G1 progeny. Phenotypic screens start with the finding of an interesting phenotype following to the identification of the causative mutation. Genedriven screens start with a gene of interest, screening sperm and DNA archives of G1 ENU‐mutagenised males. Once mutations are identified, the stored sperm is used to produce mice that are then tested for phenotypes.



Barbaric I, Wells S, Russ A and Dear TN (2007) Spectrum of ENU‐induced mutations in phenotype‐driven and gene‐driven screens in the mouse. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 48: 124–142.

Beck JA, Lloyd S, Hafezparast M et al. (2000) Genealogies of mouse inbred strains. Nature Genetics 24: 23–25.

De Stasio EA and Dorman S (2001) Optimization of ENU mutagenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mutation Research 495(1–2): 81–88.

Garcia‐Garcia MJ and Anderson KV (2003) Essential role of glycosaminoglycans in Fgf signaling during mouse gastrulation. Cell 114: 727–737.

Godinho SI, Maywood ES, Shaw L et al. (2007) The after‐hours mutant reveals a role for Fbxl3 in determining mammalian circadian period. Science 316: 897–900.

Hafezparast M, Klocke R, Ruhrberg C et al. (2003) Mutations in dynein link motor neuron degeneration to defects in retrograde transport. Science 300: 808–812.

Hardisty‐Hughes RE, Tateossian H, Morse SA et al. (2006) A mutation in the F‐box gene, Fbxo11, causes otitis media in the Jeff mouse. Human Molecular Genetics 15: 3273–3279.

Hoebe K, Georgel P, Rutschmann S et al. (2005) CD36 is a sensor of diacylglycerides. Nature 433: 523–527.

Jeans AF, Oliver PL, Johnson R et al. (2007) A dominant mutation in Snap25 causes impaired vesicle trafficking, sensorimotor gating, and ataxia in the blind‐drunk mouse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 2431–2436.

Justice MJ, Carpenter DA, Favor J et al. (2000) Effects of ENU dosage on mouse strains. Mammalian Genome 11: 484–488.

Keays DA, Clark TG and Flint J (2006) Estimating the number of coding mutations in genotypic‐ and phenotypic‐driven N‐ethyl‐N‐nitrosourea (ENU) screens. Mammalian Genome 17: 230–238.

Knapik EW (2000) ENU mutagenesis in zebrafish – from genes to complex diseases. Mammalian Genome 11: 511–519.

Lewis MA, Quint E, Glazier AM et al. (2009) An ENU‐induced mutation of miR‐96 associated with progressive hearing loss in mice. Nature Genetics 41: 614–618.

Lisse TS, Thiele F, Fuchs H et al. (2008) ER stress‐mediated apoptosis in a new mouse model of osteogenesis imperfect. PLoS Genetics 4: e7.

Munroe RJ, Bergstrom RA, Zheng QY et al. (2000) Mouse mutants from chemically mutagenized embryonic stem cells. Nature Genetics 24: 318–321.

Nolan PM, Peters J, Strivens M et al. (2000) A systematic, genome‐wide, phenotype‐driven mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mouse. Nature Genetics 25: 440–443.

Quwailid MM, Hugill A, Dear N et al. (2004) A gene‐driven ENU‐based approach to generating an allelic series in any gene. Mammalian Genome 15: 585–591.

Rajaraman S, Davis WS, Mahakali‐Zama A et al. (2002) An allelic series of mutations in the kit ligand gene of mice. I. Identification of point mutations in seven ethylnitrosourea‐induced Kitl(Steel) alleles. Genetics 162: 331–340.

Russell WL, Kelly EM, Hunsicker PR et al. (1979) Specific‐locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most potent mutagen in the mouse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 11: 5818–5819.

Thaung C, West K, Clark BJ et al. (2002) Novel ENU‐induced eye mutations in the mouse: models for human eye. Human Molecular Genetics 11: 755–767.

Van Boxtel R, Gould MN, Cuppen E and Smits BM (2010) ENU mutagenesis to generate genetically modified rat models. Methods in Molecular Biology 597: 151–167.

Vinuesa CG, Cook MC, Angelucci C et al. (2005) A RING‐type ubiquitin ligase family member required to repress follicular helper T cells and autoimmunity. Nature 435: 452–458.

Zhang Z, Alpert D, Francis R et al. (2009) Massively parallel sequencing identifies the gene Megf8 with ENU‐induced mutation causing heterotaxy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106: 3219–3224.

Further Reading

Acevedo‐Arozena A, Wells S, Potter P et al. (2008) ENU mutagenesis, a way forward to understand gene function. Annual Review in Genomics and Human Genetics 9: 49–59.

Crawley J (2007) What's Wrong With My Mouse?: Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Gondo Y (2008) Trends in large‐scale mouse mutagenesis: from genetics to functional genomics. Nature Review. Genetics 9: 803–810.

Silver LM (1995) Mouse Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Web links



Mouse SNP Jackson Laboratories database:‐cgi/phenome/mpdcgi?rtn=snps/door

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Acevedo‐Arozena, Abraham, Ricketts, Thomas, and Corrochano, Silvia(Apr 2010) Deconstructing Gene Function through ENU Mutagenesis. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0022409]