Cytokinesis

Stephen L Gregory, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Robert Saint, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Published online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0022536

Abstract

Cytokinesis is the term given to the division of a cell into two daughter cells. Cytokinesis in all cells requires the resolution of the single lipid bilayer of the parent cell into separate bilayers enclosing the two daughter cells, yet cytokinesis mechanisms differ markedly in different cell types. In bacteria, a ring of FtsZ protein filaments constricts the membrane. FtsZ‐like proteins operate in some Archeal species, but others use a different mechanism. In plants, vesicles are deposited by microtubules in the centre of the cell to create sheets of membrane that grow outwards until they reach and fuse with the cytoplasmic membrane. In animal cells, actin and myosin form a contractile ring, which draws the membrane inwards. Bundled microtubules and vesicle trafficking then complete the separation (abscission). In all cases, cytokinesis closely follows chromosome segregation and constriction occurs between the separating chromosomes to ensure the genetic integrity of the daughter cells.

Key Concepts:

  • To make two cells from one, the DNA needs to be copied, the two copies separated and the cell divided (cytokinesis) so that one DNA copy resides in each daughter cell.

  • The cytoplasmic membrane of the parent cell must resolve into the two cytoplasmic membranes of the daughter cells.

  • Cell division frequently involves the formation of a ring of protein filaments that attaches to the membrane and constricts, drawing the membrane inwards.

  • In many bacterial cells, the main component of this ring is the FtsZ protein. In animal cells, the main components are actin and myosin.

  • In plant cells, microtubules form across the future site of division and deposit membrane vesicles which fuse to form the new membrane.

  • In many eukaryote cells, the mitotic spindle allows the DNA to separate, and then signals the cell to determine the plane of division.

  • In animals, the final separation of daughter cells involves vesicles fusing with the cell membrane.

  • Errors in cytokinesis have serious implications for cancer.

Keywords: cell division; abscission; mitosis; spindle; cytoskeleton; DNA; aneuploidy

Figure 1.

A model for the oscillation of MinCDE localisation to suppress the formation of the FtsZ ring at the poles of an E. coli cell. MinD‐ATP binds to the membrane at one pole of the cell. MinC binds to MinD‐ATP and co‐localises with it, inhibiting FtsZ ring formation. MinE, present as a ring at the edge of the MinD zone, displaces MinC and stimulates the MinD ATPase resulting in release of MinD from the membrane. The ADP bound to the released MinD is then exchanged for ATP, which results in re‐dimerisation, localisation to the membrane at the other pole and recruitment of MinC to that pole. Once the MinE ring reaches the cell pole MinE is released and reassembles at the edge of the new MinD zone at the other end of the cell. Because of this oscillation, MinC alternately inhibits FtsZ polymerisation at the poles, resulting in assembly of the FtsZ ring (orange) in the middle of the long axis of the cell. Adapted with permission from Lutkenhaus J and Sundaramoorthy M (2003) MinD and role of the deviant Walker A motif, dimerisation and membrane binding in oscillation. Molecular Microbiology 48: 295–303. Reprinted with permission from John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/DOI/10.1046/j.1365‐2958.2003.03427.x/abstract).
Figure 2.

Animal cytokinesis and the contractile ring. Diagrammatic representation of actomyosin contractile rings in animal cells. Attachment of the actin filaments to the plasma membrane via a formin is hypothetical. Movement of myosin‐II towards the barbed (anchored) end of an actin filament it will draw the plasma membrane inwards. Illustrations by Graham Johnson. Reprinted with permission from Pollard ; Elsevier B.V. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09550674).
Figure 3.

Positioning the contractile ring. Centralspindlin complexes move to the midzone along microtubules where they concentrate and activate the RhoGEF through a direct protein–protein interaction. This leads to a cortical ring of activated Rho1 between the separated chromosomes. The activated Rho1 leads to formation and activation of the actomyosin contractile ring (not shown). Reprinted with permission from Saint R and Somers WG (2003) Animal cell division: a fellowship of the double ring? Journal of Cell Science 116: 4277–4281. (http://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=14514883) The Company of Biologists.
Figure 4.

Establishing the contractile ring. (a) Possible role for the scaffold protein, Anillin, in establishing the actoymosin contractile ring. Following activation of RhoA by Ect2A/Pbl at the cortical midzone, RhoA and RacGap interact with the Anillin protein, which may recruit actomyosin to the membrane to form the contractile ring. (b) Possible roles of RhoA in cytokinesis Activated RhoA is known to trigger the two key events in formation of actomyosin contractile networks. First, it can bind to and activate Formin proteins, the first step in a cascade of events that leads to actin polymerisation. Secondly, it can bind to and activate protein kinases such as (ROK) and (CITK), which can phosphorylate the (MRLC), causing myosin contraction. Adapted with permission from D'Avino PP (2009) How to scaffold the contractile ring for a safe cytokinesis – lessons from Anillin‐related proteins. Journal of Cell Science 122: 1071–1079. (http://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19339546). The Company of Biologists.
Figure 5.

Abscission Possible role of microtubules and vesicle trafficking in abscission during animal cell cytokinesis. Components are delivered by molecular motors such as KIF13A, which move to the plus ends of the midbody microtubules and, mediated perhaps by association with components of the ESCRT‐III complex, induce abscission. Reprinted from Nezis IP, Sagona AP, Schink KO and Stenmark H (2010) Divide and ProsPer: The emerging role of PtdIns3P in cytokinesis. Trends in Cell Biology 20: 642–649 with permission from Elsevier.
close

References

Alsop GB and Zhang D (2003) Microtubules are the only structural constituent of the spindle apparatus required for induction of cell cleavage. Journal of Cell Biology 162: 383–390.

Anderson DE, Gueiros‐Filho FJ and Erickson HP (2004) Assembly dynamics of FtsZ rings in Bacillus subtilis and E. coli and effects of FtsZ‐regulating proteins. Journal of Bacteriology 186: 5775–5781.

Barr FA and Gruneberg U (2007) Cytokinesis: placing and making the final cut. Cell 131: 847–860.

Batchelder EL, Thomas‐Virnig CL, Hardin JD and White JG (2007) Cytokinesis is not controlled by calmodulin or myosin light chain kinase in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo. FEBS Letters 581: 4337–4341.

Bathe M and Chang F (2010) Cytokinesis and the contractile ring in fission yeast: towards a systems‐level understanding. Trends in Microbiology 18: 38–45.

Bement WM, Benink HA and von Dassow G (2005) A microtubule‐dependent zone of active RhoA during cleavage plane specification. Journal of Cell Biology 170: 91–101.

Bi EF and Lutkenhaus J (1991) FtsZ ring structure associated with division in E. coli. Nature 354: 161–164.

Cabernard C, Prehoda KE and Doe CQ (2010) A spindle‐independent cleavage furrow positioning pathway. Nature 467: 91–94.

Carlton JG and Martin‐Serrano J (2007) Parallels between cytokinesis and retroviral budding: a role for the ESCRT machinery. Science 316: 1908–1912.

Connell JW, Lindon C, Luzio JP and Reid E (2009) Spastin couples microtubule severing to membrane traffic in completion of cytokinesis and secretion. Traffic 10: 42–56.

D'Avino PP, Takeda T, Capalbo L et al. (2008) Interaction between Anillin and RacGAP50C connects the actomyosin contractile ring with spindle microtubules at the cell division site. Journal of Cell Science 121: 1151–1158.

von Dassow G (2009) Concurrent cues for cytokinetic furrow induction in animal cells. Trends in Cell Biology 19: 165–173.

De Boer PA, Crossley RE and Rothfield LI (1989) A division inhibitor and a topological specificity factor coded for by the minicell locus determine proper placement of the division septum in E. coli. Cell 56: 641–649.

Devore JJ, Conrad GW and Rappaport R (1989) A model for astral stimulation of cytokinesis in animal cells. Journal of Cell Biology 109: 2225–2232.

Eggert US, Mitchison TJ and Field CM (2006) Animal cytokinesis: from parts list to mechanisms. Annual Review of Biochemistry 75: 543–566.

Fendrych M, Synek L, Pecenkova T et al. (2010) The Arabidopsis exocyst complex is involved in cytokinesis and cell plate maturation. The Plant Cell 22: 3053–3065.

Fujiwara T, Bandi M, Nitta M et al. (2005) Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53‐null cells. Nature 437: 1043–1047.

Glotzer M (2009) The 3Ms of central spindle assembly: microtubules, motors and MAPs. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10: 9–20.

Gregory SL, Ebrahimi S, Milverton J et al. (2008) Cell division requires a direct link between microtubule‐bound RacGAP and Anillin in the contractile ring. Current Biology 18: 25–29.

Gromley A, Yeaman C, Rosa J et al. (2005) Centriolin anchoring of exocyst and SNARE complexes at the midbody is required for secretory‐vesicle‐mediated abscission. Cell 123: 75–87.

Hickson G R, Echard A and O'Farrell PH (2006) Rho‐kinase controls cell shape changes during cytokinesis. Current Biology 16: 359–370.

Hiwatashi Y, Obara M, Sato Y et al. (2008) Kinesins are indispensable for interdigitation of phragmoplast microtubules in the moss Physcomitrella patens. The Plant Cell 20: 3094–3106.

Kamijo K, Ohara N, Abe M et al. (2006) Dissecting the role of Rho‐mediated signaling in contractile ring formation. Molecular Biology of the Cell 17: 43–55.

Khodjakov A and Rieder CL (2009) The nature of cell‐cycle checkpoints: facts and fallacies. Journal of Biology 8: 88.

Kishi K, Sasaki T, Kuroda S, Itoh T and Takai Y (1993) Regulation of cytoplasmic division of Xenopus embryo by rho p21 and its inhibitory GDP/GTP exchange protein (rho GDI). Journal of Cell Biology 120: 1187–1195.

Krapp A and Simanis V (2008) An overview of the fission yeast septation initiation network. Biochemical Society Transactions 36: 411–415.

Lindås A‐C, Karlsson E, Lindgren MT, Ettema TJ and Bernander R (2008) A unique cell division machinery in the Archaea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA) 105: 18942–18946.

Lutkenhaus J (2007) Assembly dynamics of the bacterial MinCDE system and spatial regulation of the Z ring. Annual Review of Biochemistry 76: 539–562.

Mabuchi I, Hamaguchi Y, Fujimoto H et al. (1993) A rho‐like protein is involved in the organisation of the contractile ring in dividing sand dollar eggs. Zygote 1: 325–331.

Matsumura F (2005) Regulation of myosin II during cytokinesis in higher eukaryotes. Trends in Cell Biology 15: 371–377.

Mukherjee A and Lutkenhaus J (1998) Dynamic assembly of FtsZ regulated by GTP hydrolysis. EMBO Journal 17: 462–469.

Müller S, Wright AJ and Smith LG (2009) Division plane control in plants: new players in the band. Trends in Cell Biology 19: 180–188.

Nishimura Y and Yonemura S (2006) Centralspindlin regulates ECT2 and RhoA accumulation at the equatorial cortex during cytokinesis. Journal of Cell Science 119: 104–114.

Oh SA, Bourdon V, Das ‘Pal M, Dickinson H and Twell D (2008) Arabidopsis kinesins HINKEL and TETRASPORE act redundantly to control cell plate expansion during cytokinesis in the male gametophyte. Molecular Plant 1: 794–799.

Parry DH, Hickson GR and O'Farrell PH (2003) Cyclin B destruction triggers changes in kinetochore behavior essential for successful anaphase. Current Biology 13: 647–653.

Pines J (2006) Mitosis: a matter of getting rid of the right protein at the right time. Trends in Cell Biology 16: 55–63.

Pollard TD (2010) Mechanics of cytokinesis in eukaryotes. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 22: 50–56.

Pollard TD and Wu JQ (2010) Understanding cytokinesis: lessons from fission yeast. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 11: 149–155.

Rappaport R (1985) Repeated furrow formation from a single mitotic apparatus in cylindrical sand dollar eggs. Journal of Experimental Zoology 234: 167–171.

Samson RY, Obita T, Freund SM, Williams RL and Bell SD (2008) A role for the ESCRT system in cell division in Archaea. Science 322: 1710–1713.

Saul D, Fabian L, Forer A and Brill JA (2004) Continuous phosphatidylinositol metabolism is required for cleavage of crane fly spermatocytes. Journal of Cell Science 117: 3887–3896.

Smith LG (1999) Divide and conquer: cytokinesis in plant cells. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2: 447–453.

Smith LG (2002) Plant cytokinesis: motoring to the finish. Current Biology 12: R206–R208.

Somers WG and Saint R (2003) A RhoGEF and Rho family GTPase‐activating protein complex links the contractile ring to cortical microtubules at the onset of cytokinesis. Developmental Cell 4: 29–39.

Steigemann P and Gerlich DW (2009) Cytokinetic abscission: cellular dynamics at the midbody. Trends in Cell Biology 19: 606–616.

Szafer‐Glusman E, Giansanti MG, Nishihama R et al. (2008) A role for very‐long‐chain fatty acids in furrow ingression during cytokinesis in Drosophila spermatocytes. Current Biology 18: 1426–1431.

Thanbichler M and Shapiro L (2006) MipZ, a spatial regulator coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division in Caulobacter. Cell 126: 147–162.

Wheatley SP, Hinchcliffe EH, Glotzer M et al. (1997) CDK1 inactivation regulates anaphase spindle dynamics and cytokinesis in vivo. Journal of Cell Biology 138: 385–393.

Yeong FM, Lim HH and Surana U (2002) MEN, destruction and separation: mechanistic links between mitotic exit and cytokinesis in budding yeast. Bioessays 24: 659–666.

Further Reading

Bement WM, Miller AL and von Dassow G (2006) Rho GTPase activity zones and transient contractile arrays. Bioessays 28: 983–993.

Boveri T (2008) Concerning the origin of malignant tumours. Translated and annotated by Henry Harris. Journal of Cell Science 121(Suppl. 1): 1–84.

Ganem NJ, Storchova Z and Pellman D (2007) Tetraploidy, aneuploidy and cancer. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 17: 157–162.

Glotzer M (2005) The molecular requirements for cytokinesis. Science 307: 1735–1739.

Hurley JH and Hanson PI (2010) Membrane budding and scission by the ESCRT machinery: it's all in the neck. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 11: 556–566.

Jürgens G (2005) Plant cytokinesis: fission by fusion. Trends in Cell Biology 15: 277–283.

Knoblich JA (2010) Asymmetric cell division: recent developments and their implications for tumour biology. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 11: 849–860.

Mingorance J, Rivas G, Vélez M, Gómez‐Puertas P and Vicente M (2010) Strong FtsZ is with the force: mechanisms to constrict bacteria. Trends in Microbiology 18: 348–356.

Rappaport R (1986) Establishment of the mechanism of cytokinesis in animal cells. International Review of Cytology 105: 245–281.

Roncero C and Sánchez Y (2010) Cell separation and the maintenance of cell integrity during cytokinesis in yeast: the assembly of a septum. Yeast 27: 521–530.

Related Sub-Topics:

Cell Cycle | Cell Shape | Lipids and Membrane Structure | Cell Membranes
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

Article Title: Cytokinesis
 
How to Cite close
Gregory, Stephen L, and Saint, Robert(May 2011) Cytokinesis. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0022536]