Origin of Bilaterian Hox Patterning System

Hox genes (homeobox-containing genes) encode regulatory transcription factors involved in the regionalisation of the antero-posterior body axis during the early embryonic development of bilateral animals. These genes are arranged in evolutionarily conserved clusters in Bilateria, which have been originated by means of several gene tandem duplications from an original ProtoHox gene. On the contrary, in the phylogenetic sister group of Bilateria, the Cnidaria, Hox genes do not seem to play a similar role for patterning the oral–aboral axis. Recently, new insights on the origin and evolution of the Hox gene patterning system have been obtained from the study of the Acoelomorpha, a group of flatworms that branched before the protostome-deuterostome divergence. On the basis of the more recent data available from Cnidaria, Acoelomorpha and the rest of the Bilateria, we analyse some plausible scenarios for the origin and evolution of the Hox system in the metazoans.

Key Concepts:

  • Hox patterning system is associated to the origin of bilaterian animals.
  • Hox genes are used as vectorial systems to pattern the major body axis.
  • Cnidarians have Hox genes but are not used, as such, to organise their oral-aboral axis.

Keywords: Hox; cluster; bilateria; acoels

Figure 1. A consensus metazoan phylogenetic tree. The relationships of all major clades are shown. The Bilateria are subdivided into two major groups, the Acoelomorpha and the Nephrozoa (containing the superclades: Deuterostomia, Lophotrochozoa and Ecdysozoa). The sister group to the Bilateria contains the Cnidaria. Ctenophora and Cnidaria form the paraphyletic group Coelenterata, the name of which refers to the presence of a single sac-like body space, the coelenteron, which communicates with the surrounding medium through the mouth. The relationships between the most basal metazoan groups are still hotly debated (thus, the polytomy in the tree).
Figure 2. Model for the evolution of the HOX cluster in metazoans based on recent phylogenetic studies in Cnidaria, which combines the most parsimonious hypothesis for Hox evolution. A unique ANTP ProtoHox gene duplicated several times in tandem in the lineage leading to C-BLCA after the divergence of the Porifera, giving rise to an ancestral HOX gene cluster. Three Hox genes were present in the C-BLCA (PG1–PG2–PPHox). In the lineage leading to the LCBA, another tandem duplication gave rise to the PG5 gene. Two sister groups formed from the LCBA: that leading to the present day acoelomorphs, and another giving rise to the P-DLCA. In the acoel lineage, the original cluster might have disintegrated (at least in Symsagittifera roscoffensis) and some genes could have been lost (possibly, but not proven, the PG2 genes), here represented by an empty box. A similar process could have occurred in nemertodermatids, although the absence of anterior genes (empty boxes) is more likely the result of limited sampling. A further tandem duplication in the Nemertodermatida lineage gave rise to a second PG5 gene. Finally, a series of tandem duplications, namely those involving the central Hox class, gave rise to the extended HOX cluster present in the P-DLCA. As the orthology between posterior Hox genes in cnidarians (CPHox) and bilaterians (BPHox) remains unclear, it is fair to suppose that cnidarian and bilaterian posterior Hox genes were produced independently in both lineages from the proto-posterior Hox gene (PPHox) present in the C-BLCA. C-BLCA, cnidarian–bilaterian last common ancestor; LCBA, last common bilaterian ancestor and P-DLCA, protostome–deuterostome last common ancestor.
Figure 3. Model for the evolution of the HOX cluster in metazoans based on the data on Hox genes in the Cnidaria constructed using nontree-based methodologies. Four Hox genes were present in the C-BLCA (PG1–PG3–PG5–CentralPPHox). The complement in the LCBA is the same, but these genes acquired a new role patterning the AP body axis in the Bilateria, with the ‘Hox code’ being established in this lineage. The absence of this gene in acoelomorphs could be due to limited sampling or its specific loss. Finally, a series of tandem duplications involving the central Hox class gave rise to the extended HOX cluster present in the P-DLCA. C-BLCA, cnidarian–bilaterian last common ancestor; LCBA, last common bilaterian ancestor and P-DLCA, protostome–deuterostome last common ancestor.
close
 References
    Aboobaker A and Blaxter ML (2003) Hox gene loss during dynamic evolution of the nematode cluster. Current Biology 13: 37–40.
    Adoutte A, Balavoine G, Lartillot N et al. (2000) The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 4453–4456.
    Adoutte A, Balavoine G, Lartillot N and de Rosa R (1999) Animal evolution: the end of the intermediate taxa? Trends in Genetics 15: 104–108.
    Amemiya CT, Powers TP, Prohaska SJ et al. (2010) Complete HOX cluster characterization of the coelacanth provides further evidence for slow evolution of its genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 3622–3627.
    Amemiya CT and Wagner GP (2006) Animal evolution: when did the ‘Hox system’ arise? Current Biology 16: R546–R548.
    Amores A, Force A, Yan Y-L et al. (1998) Zebra fish Hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282: 1711–1714.
    Baguñà J and Riutort M (2004) The dawn of bilaterian animals. The case of acoelomorph flatworms. BioEssays 26: 1046–1057.
    Balavoine G, de Rosa R and Adoutte A (2002) Hox clusters and bilaterian phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 366–373.
    Ball EE, de Jong DM, Schierwater B et al. (2007) Implications of cnidarian gene expression patterns for the origins of bilaterality – is the glass half full or half empty? Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 701–711.
    book Bürglin TR (1994) "A comprehensive classification of homeobox genes". In: Duboule D (ed.) Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes, pp. 25–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    book Bürglin TR (1996) "Homeodomain proteins". In: Meyers RA (ed.) Encyclopedia of Molecular Biology and Molecular Medicine, vol. 3, pp. 55–76. Weinheim: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
    Cameron RA, Rowen L, Nesbitt R et al. (2006) Unusual gene order and organization of the sea urchin Hox cluster. Journal of Experimental Zoology 306B: 45–58.
    Chiori R, Jager M, Denker E et al. (2009) Are Hox genes ancestrally involved in axial patterning? Evidence from the hydrozoan Clytia hemisphaerica (Cnidaria). PLoS One 4: e4231.
    Chourrout D, Delsuc F, Chourrout P et al. (2006) Minimal ProtoHox cluster inferred from bilaterian and cnidarian Hox complements. Nature 442: 684–687.
    De Robertis EM (2008) Evo-Devo: variations on ancestral themes. Cell 132: 185–195.
    Deutsch JS and Le Guyader H (1998) The neuronal zootype. An hypothesis. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences – Series III 321: 713–719.
    Duboule D (2007) The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters. Development 134: 2549–2560.
    Ferrier DEK, Minguillón C, Holland PWH and Garcia-Fernández J (2000) The amphioxus Hox cluster: deuterostome posterior flexibility and Hox14. Evolution & Development 2: 284–293.
    Finnerty JR, Master VA, Irvine S et al. (1996) Homeobox genes in the Ctenophora: identification of paired-type and Hox homologues in the atentaculate ctenophore, Beroë ovata. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 5: 249–258.
    Finnerty JR, Pang K, Burton P, Paulson D and Martindale MQ (2004) Origins of bilateral symmetry: Hox and Dpp expression in a sea anemone. Science 304: 1335–1337.
    Gauchat D, Mazet F, Berney C et al. (2000) Evolution of Antp class genes and differential expression of Hydra Hox-paraHox genes in anterior patterning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 4493–4498.
    book Gilbert SF (2006) Developmental Biology, 8th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
    Hejnol A and Martindale MQ (2009) Coordinated spatial and temporal expression of Hox genes during embryogenesis in the acoel Convolutriloba longifissura. BMC Biology 7: 65.
    Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A et al. (2009) Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 276: 4261–4270.
    Ikuta T, Yoshida N, Satoh N and Saiga H (2004) Ciona intestinalis Hox gene cluster: its dispersed structure and residual colinear expression in development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101: 15118–15123.
    Jakob W, Sagasser S, Dellaporta S et al. (2004) The Trox-2 Hox/ParaHox gene of Trichoplax (Placozoa) marks an epithelial boundary. Development Genes and Evolution 214: 170–175.
    Jiménez-Guri E, Paps J, García-Fernàndez J and Saló E (2006) Hox and ParaHox genes in Nemertodermatida, a basal bilaterian clade. International Journal of Developmental Biology 50: 675–679.
    Kamm K, Schierwater B, Jakob W, Dellaporta SL and Miller DJ (2006) Axial patterning and diversification in the Cnidaria predate the Hox system. Current Biology 16: 920–926.
    Kaufman TC, Seeger MA and Olsen G (1990) Molecular and genetic organization of the antennapedia gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Advances in Genetics 27: 309–362.
    Koziol U, Lalanne AI and Castillo E (2009) Hox genes in the parasitic platyhelminthes Mesocestoides corti, Echinococcus multilocularis, and Schistosoma mansoni: evidence for a reduced Hox complement. Biochemical Genetics 47: 100–116.
    Larroux C, Fahey B, Degnan SM et al. (2007) The NK homeobox gene cluster predates the origin of Hox genes. Current Biology 17: 706–710.
    Lewis EB (1978) A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276: 565–570.
    McGinnis W and Krumlauf R (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68: 283–302.
    Meyer A and Malaga-Trillo E (1999) Vertebrate genomics: more fishy tales about Hox genes. Current Biology 9: R210–R213.
    Monteiro AS and Ferrier DEK (2006) Hox genes are not always colinear. International Journal of Developmental Biology 2: 95–103.
    Monteiro AS, Schierwater B, Dellaporta SL and Holland PWH (2006) A low diversity of ANTP class homeobox genes in Placozoa. Evolution & Development 8: 174–182.
    Moreno E, Nadal M, Baguñà J and Martínez P (2009) Tracking the origins of the bilaterian Hox patterning system: insights from the acoel flatworm Symsagittifera roscoffensis. Evolution & Development 11: 572–579.
    Mungpakdee S, Seo H-C, Angotzi AR et al. (2008) Differential evolution of the 13 Atlantic salmon Hox clusters. Molecular Biology & Evolution 25: 1333–1343.
    Nielsen C (2010) After all: Xenoturbella is an acoelomorph! Evolution & Development 12: 241–243.
    Pang K and Martindale MQ (2008) Developmental expression of homeobox genes in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. Development Genes and Evolution 218: 307–319.
    Pearson JC, Lemons D and McGinnis W (2005) Modulating hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nature Reviews. Genetics 6: 893–904.
    Peterson KJ and Sperling EA (2007) Poriferan ANTP genes: primitively simple or secondarily reduced? Evolution & Development 9: 405–408.
    Quiquand M, Yanze N, Schmich J et al. (2009) More constraint on ParaHox than Hox gene families in early metazoan evolution. Developmental Biology 328: 173–187.
    de Rosa R, Grenier JK, Andreeva T et al. (1999) Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution. Nature 399: 772–776.
    Ryan JF, Mazza ME, Pang K et al. (2007) Pre-bilaterian origins of the Hox cluster and the Hox code: evidence from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. PLoS One 1: e153.
    Seo H-C, Edvardsen RB, Maeland AD et al. (2004) Hox cluster disintegration with anteroposterior order of expression in Oikopleura dioica. Nature 431: 67–71.
    Sikes JM and Bely AE (2010) Making heads from tails: development of a reversed anterior-posterior axis during 3 budding in an acoel. Developmental Biology 338: 86–97.
    Soshnikova N and Duboule D (2009) Epigenetic temporal control of mouse Hox genes in vivo. Science 324: 1320–1323.
    Tarchini B and Duboule D (2006) Control of Hoxd genes collinearity during early limb development. Developmental Cell 10: 93–103.
    Thomas-Chollier M, Ledent V, Leyns L and Vervoort M (2010) A non-tree-based comprehensive study of metazoan Hox and ParaHox genes prompts new insights into their origin and evolution. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 73.
    Tschopp P, Tarchini B, Spitz F, Zakany J and Duboule D (2009) Uncoupling time and space in the collinear regulation of Hox genes. PLoS Genetics 5: e1000398.
    Wada H, Garcia-Fernández J and Holland PWH (1999) Colinear and segmental expression of amphioxus Hox genes. Development 213: 131–141.
    Yanze N, Spring J, Schmidli C and Schmid V (2001) Conservation of Hox/ParaHox-related genes in the early development of a cnidarian. Developmental Biology 236: 89–98.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Moreno, Eduardo, and Martínez, Pedro(Dec 2010) Origin of Bilaterian Hox Patterning System. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0022852]