References
Andersson M
(1994)
Sexual Selection.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Monographs in Behaviour and Ecology.
Arnqvist G and
Rowe L
(2005)
Sexual Conflict.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bacigalupe LD,
Crudgington HS,
Hunter FM et al.
(2007)
Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
20:
1763–1771.
Bacigalupe LD,
Crudgington HS,
Slate J et al.
(2008)
Sexual selection and interacting phenotypes in experimental evolution: a study of Drosophila pseudoobscura mating behavior.
Evolution
62:
1804–1812.
Bakker TCM and
Pomiankowski A
(1995)
The genetic‐basis of female mate preferences.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
8:
129–171.
Birkhead TR and
Møller AP (ed.)
(1998)
Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection.
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Burke MK and
Rose MR
(2009)
Experimental evolution with Drosophila.
American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
296:
R1847–R1854.
Chenoweth SF,
Rundle HD and
Blows MW
(2010)
Experimental evidence for the evolution of indirect genetic effects: changes in the interaction effect coefficient, Psi (Ψ), due to sexual selection.
Evolution
64:
1849–1856.
Crudgington HS,
Fellows S,
Badcock NS et al.
(2009)
Experimental manipulation of sexual selection promotes greater male mating capacity but does not alter sperm investment.
Evolution
63:
926–938.
Crudgington HS,
Fellows S and
Snook RR
(2010)
Increased opportunity for sexual conflict promotes harmful males with elevated courtship frequencies.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
23:
440–446.
Dudley JW
(2007)
From means to QTL: the Illinois long‐term selection experiment as a case study in quantitative genetics.
Crop Science
47(suppl. 3):
S20–S31.
Edward DA,
Fricke C and
Chapman T
(2010)
Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
365:
2541–2548.
Elena SF and
Lenski RE
(2003)
Microbial genetics: evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation.
Nature Reviews. Genetics
4:
457.
Endler JA
(1980)
Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata.
Evolution
34:
76–91.
Firman RC and
Simmons LW
(2010)
Experimental evolution of sperm quality via postcopulatory sexual selection in house mice.
Evolution
64:
1245–1256.
Fricke C,
Andersson C and
Arnqvist G
(2010)
Natural selection hampers divergence of reproductive traits in a seed beetle.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
23:
1857–1867.
Fricke C and
Arnqvist G
(2007)
Rapid adaptation to a novel host in a seed beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus): the role of sexual selection.
Evolution
61:
440–454.
Fuller RC,
Baer CF and
Travis J
(2005)
How and when selection experiments might actually be useful.
Integrative and Comparative Biology
45:
391–404.
García‐González F
(2009)
Evolución en acción: estudios de evolución experimental en el contexto de la selección sexual.
In: Dopazo H and
Navarro A (eds)
Adaptación y Evolución. 150 años después del Origen de las Especies,
pp. 281–289.
Valencia: Sociedad Española de Biología Evolutiva‐Obrapropia S. L.
Garland TJ and
Rose MR (eds)
(2009)
Experimental Evolution: Concepts, Methods and Applications of Selection Experiments.
Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Gay L,
Eady PE,
Vasudev R et al.
(2009)
Does reproductive isolation evolve faster in larger populations via sexually antagonistic coevolution?
Biology Letters
5:
693–696.
Hill WG and
Caballero A
(1992)
Artificial selection experiments.
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
23:
287–310.
Holland B and
Rice WR
(1999)
Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA
96:
5083–5088.
Hollis B,
Fierst JL and
Houle D
(2009)
Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.
Evolution
63:
324–333.
Hosken DJ,
Garner TW and
Ward PI
(2001)
Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters.
Current Biology
11:
489–493.
Hosken DJ and
Ward PI
(2001)
Experimental evidence for testis size evolution via sperm competition.
Ecology Letters
4:
10–13.
Jarzebowska M and
Radwan J
(2010)
Sexual selection counteracts extinction of small populations of the bulb mites.
Evolution
64:
1283–1289.
LaMunyon CW and
Ward S
(2002)
Evolution of larger sperm in response to experimentally increased sperm competition in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society
269:
1125–1128.
Maklakov AA,
Cayetano L,
Brooks RC et al.
(2010)
The roles of life‐history selection and sexual selection in the adaptive evolution of mating behavior in a beetle.
Evolution
64:
1273–1282.
Manning A
(1961)
The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster.
Animal Behaviour
9:
82–92.
Martin OY and
Hosken DJ
(2003a)
Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy.
Evolution
57:
2765–2772.
Martin OY and
Hosken DJ
(2003b)
The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict.
Nature
423:
979–982.
Miller GT and
Pitnick S
(2002)
Sperm‐female coevolution in Drosophila.
Science
298:
1230–1233.
Morrow EH,
Stewart AD and
Rice WR
(2008)
Assessing the extent of genome‐wide intralocus sexual conflict via experimentally enforced gender‐limited selection.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
21:
1046–1054.
Parker GA
(1979)
Sexual selection and sexual conflict.
In: Blum MS and
Blum NA (eds)
Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects,
pp. 123–166.
New York: Academic Press.
Pitnick S,
Brown WD and
Miller GT
(2001a)
Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society
268:
557–563.
Pitnick S,
Miller GT,
Reagan J et al.
(2001b)
Males’ evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society
268:
1071–1080.
Prasad NG,
Bedhomme S,
Day T et al.
(2007)
An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male‐limited evolution.
American Naturalist
169:
29–37.
Promislow DEL,
Smith EA and
Pearse L
(1998)
Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA
95:
10687–10692.
Reuter M,
Linklater JR,
Lehmann L et al.
(2008)
Adaptation to experimental alterations of the operational sex ratio in populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
Evolution
62:
401–412.
Reznick DN and
Ghalambor CK
(2005)
Selection in nature: experimental manipulations of natural populations.
Integrative and Comparative Biology
45:
456–462.
Rice WR
(1996)
Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution.
Nature
381:
232–234.
Rogers DW and
Greig D
(2009)
Experimental evolution of a sexually selected display in yeast.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society
276:
543–549.
Rundle HD,
Chenoweth SF and
Blows MW
(2006)
The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.
Evolution
60:
2218–2225.
Simmons LW
(2001)
Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Simmons LW and
García‐González F
(2008)
Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles.
Evolution
62:
2580–2591.
Simmons LW,
House CM,
Hunt J et al.
(2009)
Evolutionary response to sexual selection in male genital morphology.
Current Biology
19(17):
1442–1446.
Snook RR,
Robertson A,
Crudgington HS et al.
(2005)
Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution of courtship song in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Behavior Genetics
35:
245–255.
Snook RS,
Brüstle L and
Slate J
(2009)
A test and review of the role of effective population size on experimental sexual selection patterns.
Evolution
63:
1923–1933.
Stewart AD,
Morrow EH and
Rice WR
(2005)
Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society
272:
2029–2035.
Tilszer M,
Antoszczyk K,
Salek N et al.
(2006)
Evolution under relaxed sexual conflict in the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini.
Evolution
60:
1868–1873.
Whitlock MC and
Agrawal AF
(2009)
Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males.
Evolution
63:
569–582.
Wigby S and
Chapman T
(2004)
Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict.
Evolution
58:
1028–1037.
Wigby S and
Chapman T
(2006)
No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
19:
1033–1039.
Wigby S,
Sirot LK,
Linklater JR et al.
(2009)
Seminal fluid protein allocation and male reproductive success.
Current Biology
19:
751–757.
Further Reading
Barrick JE,
Yu DS,
Yoon SH et al.
(2009)
Genome evolution and adaptation in a long‐term experiment with E. coli.
Nature
461:
1243–1247.
Bennett AF and
Lenski RE
(1999)
Experimental evolution and its role in evolutionary physiology.
American Zoologist
39:
346–362.
Birkhead TR and
Pizzari T
(2002)
Postcopulatory sexual selection.
Nature Reviews. Genetics
3:
262–273.
Buckling A,
Maclean RC,
Brockhurst MA et al.
(2009)
The Beagle in a bottle.
Nature
457:
824–829.
Darwin CR
(1859)
On the Origin of Species.
London: John Murray.
Darwin CR
(1871)
The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex.
London: John Murray.
Eberhard WG
(1996)
Female Control: Sexual Selection By Cryptic Female Choice.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Holland B and
Rice WR
(1998)
Chase‐away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance.
Evolution
52:
1–7.
Parker GA
(1970)
Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects.
Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
45:
525–567.
Trivers RL
(1972)
Parental investment and sexual selection.
In: Campbell R (ed.)
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man,
pp. 136–179.
London: Heinemann.