Geographical Origin of the Domestic Dog


The domestic dog (Canis familiaris) is considered to be the oldest domestic animal in the world. World‐wide mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA) studies clearly indicate a single origin in time and place in Southeast Asia less than 16 000 years ago including a high number of female foundation wolves resulting in 10 subhaplogroups within three haplogroups. Later hybridisation events in East Asia, the Middle East, Scandinavia and possibly North America formed 3–4 small haplogroups. In contrast, the archaeological record, favours other, sometimes multiple, regions for dog domestication (mainly Europe and Middle East), but suffers from a lack of samples from Southeast Asia and is problematic, because of the difficulty of distinguishing between wolf and dog in fossil remains. Future studies including, for example, paternal markers such as the Y‐chromosome, autosomal markers like SNPs, and ancient DNA samples of both wolves and dogs may give new insights into early domestication history and the dog's migration routes.

Key Concepts:

  • The dog is considered to be the oldest domestic animal species and it is widely accepted that its only ancestor is the wolf (Canis lupus).

  • Archaeological records of early potential dog remains are fragmentary and controversial as well as biased in their geographical coverage, focusing mainly on fossils found in Europe and the Middle East.

  • Recent genetic studies based on mtDNA suggest a single origin in Southeast Asia from numerous wolves less than 16 000 years ago as well as later hybridisation events in East Asia, the Middle East, Scandinavia and possibly North America.

  • New World dogs are likely to be descendants of Eurasian domesticated dogs, thereby ruling out North America as a centre of domestication.

  • The dingo is an ancient, originally domesticated, but now feral, dog which arrived to Australia about 5000 years before present (YBP).

  • Future studies may include ancient DNA approaches and additional markers such as Y‐chromosome and genome‐wide markers like SNPs to give additional insight into domestication history and migrations of early domestic dogs.

Keywords: domestic dog; domestication; mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA); control region; Grey wolf; Southeast Asia; dingo; Canis familiaris; ancient DNA (aDNA); archaeology

Figure 1.

The dog's ancestor, the wolf (Canis lupus). Image courtesy of Gary Kramer, US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Figure 2.

The domestic dog (Canis familiaris) comes in different shapes and sizes. The (a) Tibetan Mastiff (guarding dog) originates from Central Asia and is a representative of an ancient dog group, the Mastiffs. (b) The Sloughi, a representative of the ancient group of Hounds, originates from (North‐) Africa and is traditionally used for hunting. Representatives of modern breeds are the (c) Fox Terrier (fox hunting), (d) Swedish Vallhund (herding/guarding) and (e) Wirehaired Dachshund (hunting). Other presumably old dog breeds include the (f) Bergamasco Sheepdog (herding) and (g) Naked Peruvian Inca Orchid (unclear role; probably connected to spiritual rituals and food), the latter has no fur except for the head hair. (a) Reproduced from,_CAC.jpg under the wikimedia commons license; (b) and (c) Copyright Dr. Dominique de Caprona, reproduced with permission; (d) reproduced from under the wikimedia creative commons license; (e) reproduced from‐haired_Dachshund_R_01.JPG under the wikimedia creative commons license; (f) reproduced from under the wikimedia creative commons license and (g) reproduced from under the wikimedia creative commons license.

Figure 3.

Genetic relationships between the mtDNA CR sequences (582 bp). (a) Phylogenetic tree for dog (unlabeled), wolf (filled square) and coyote (Coy) haplotypes. The six main phylogenetic haplogroups (A–F) of dog haplotypes, discussed in the text, are indicated. Note the close relation between dog and wolf, compared to coyote (the closest wild relative of wolf), clearly indicating that dogs originate from wolf. (b) Minimum spanning networks showing the relationships between the haplotypes in dog haplogroup A, B and C, and the representation in different geographical regions. The haplotypes are symbolised by circles (coloured or white), and are separated by one mutational step; black dots are hypothetical intermediates. Fourteen virtually universally occurring haplotypes (‘Universal Types’: UTs) are indicated with bold lining. The representation of haplotypes in the geographical regions is shown by the colour and size of the circles. A coloured circle indicates the presence of the haplotype (blue for haplotypes shared with other regions and orange for haplotypes unique to the region); white denotes nonrepresented haplotypes. The size of the circle is proportional to the frequency of the haplotype in the region. Note the difference in representation between the eastern (East Asia) and western (West: Europe, SW Asia and Africa) parts of the Old World, and that Asia South of Yangtze River (ASY) is the only subregion with virtually complete representation in all parts across the networks. (c) The 10 principal subhaplogroups in haplogroups A, B and C (six for haplogroup A, two each for B and C), identified by analysis of the entire mtDNA genomes for the samples indicated by colour. Haplogroup A: subclade a1 orange, a2 green, a3 red (upper part of network), a4 red (lower part of network), a5 blue and a6 yellow. B: subclade b1 orange and b2 green. C: subclade c1 green and c2 orange. See geographical representation of the 10 subhaplogroups in Figure , compare also with Figure b. Reproduced from Pang et al. with permission from Oxford University Press.

Figure 4.

Genetic diversity for CR data, among regions across the Old World. (a) Genetic diversity across the Old World. Pie diagrams show the proportion of individuals having haplogroups A (blue), B (red) and C (yellow). Note the similar proportions of A, B and C among regions, which indicates that haplogroups A, B and C (and consequently dogs) originated from a single geographical region. Boxes show (i) UT: the proportion of individuals having one of the 14 ‘universally occurring’ haplotypes of haplogroups A, B and C. (ii) UTd: the proportion having a UT‐derived haplotype, i.e. a haplotype which is either a UT or differs by a single mutation from a UT. Note that 95–100% of the dogs in Europe and SW Asia have a UTd, while ASY has only 47% UTd, a consequence of the difference in representation across the networks in Figure b. (iii) SC: the representation of the 6 nonuniversal (the other 4 are found in all populations) of the totally 10 subhaplogroups of haplogroups A, B and C (see the 10 groups in Figure c). Note that only ASY harbours all 10 subhaplogroups. (Eur N/S cont – Europe North/South continent; N/C China – North/Central China [north of Yellow River/between Yellow and Yangtze River]; ASY – Asia South of Yangtze River). (b) Genetic diversity in Southeastern Asia. Boxes show UT, UTd and SC as defined in Figure a. Sampled regions are indicated by colour. LHS – Liaoning, Hebei and Shanxi; GG – Guanxi and Guangdong. SE Asia – Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia. Tibet includes samples from Qinghai and Nepal. Reproduced from Pang et al. with permission from Oxford University Press.

Figure 5.

(a) and (b) The dingo, an early domesticated, now feral, dog indigenous to Australia. Image courtesy of Sam Fraser‐Smith.



Albrechtsen A, Nielsen FC and Nielsen R (2010) Ascertainment bias in SNP chips affects measures of population divergence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27(11): 2534–2547.

Anderson TM, vonHoldt BM, Candille SI et al. (2009) Molecular and evolutionary history of melanism in North American gray wolves. Science 323(5919): 1339–1343.

Bruford MW, Bradley DG and Luikart G (2003) DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nature Reviews. Genetics 4: 900–910.

Clutton‐Brock J (1995) Origins of the dog: domestication and early history. In: Serpell J (ed.) The Domestic Dog, Its Evolution, Behavior and Interactions With People, pp. 7–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davis SJM (1981) The effects of temperature change and domestication on the body size of Late Pleistocene to Holocene mammals of Israel. Paleobiology 7(1): 101–114.

Davis SJM and Valla FR (1978) Evidence for domestication of the dog 12,000 years ago in the Natufian of Israel. Nature 276: 608–610.

Dayan T (1994) Early domesticated dogs of the Near East. Journal of Archaeological Science 21: 633–640.

Deguilloux MF, Moquel J, Pemonge MH and Colombeau G (2009) Ancient DNA supports lineage replacement in European dog gene pool: insight into Neolithic southeast France. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(2): 513–519.

Detry C and Cardoso JL (2010) On some remains of dog (Canis familiaris) from the Mesolithic shell‐middens of Muge, Portugal. Journal of Archaeological Science 37(11): 2762–2774.

Diamond J (2002) Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418: 700–707.

Flagstad Ø, Walker CW, Vilà C et al. (2003) Two centuries of the Scandinavian wolf population: patterns of genetic variability and migration during an era of dramatic decline. Molecular Ecology 12(4): 869–880.

Gao ZX (2006) Review of the research on wolf in China. Chinese Journal of Zoology 41: 134–136, (in Chinese).

Germonpré M, Sablin MV, Stevens RE et al. (2009) Fossil dogs and wolves from Palaeolithic sites in Belgium, the Ukraine and Russia: osteometry, ancient DNA and stable isotopes. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(2): 473–490.

vonHoldt BM, Pollinger JP, Lohmueller KE et al. (2010) Genome‐wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication. Nature 464(7290): 898–902.

Iacolina L, Scandura M, Gazzola A et al. (2010) Y‐chromosome microsatellite variation in Italian wolves: a contribution to the study of wolf‐dog hybridization patterns. Mammalian Biology 75(4): 341–347.

Jin J and Xu H (1992) Opinions about the early Neolithic site of Nanzhuangtou at Xushui. Kaogu 11: 1018–1022, (In Chinese).

Jing Y (2008) The origins and development of animal domestication in China. Chinese Archaeology 8: 1–7.

Klütsch CFC, Seppälä EH, Lohi H et al. (2011) Regional occurrence, high frequency but low diversity of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup d1 suggests a recent dog‐wolf hybridization in Scandinavia. Animal Genetics 42(1): 100–103.

Koler‐Matznick J, Lehr Brisbin I Jr, Feinstein M and Bulmer S (2003) An updated description of the New Guinea singing dog (Canis hallstromi, Troughton 1957). Journal of Zoology, London 261: 109–118.

Koop BF, Burbridge M, Byun A et al. (2000) Ancient DNA evidence of a separate origin for North American indigenous dogs. In: Dogs through Time: An Archaeological Perspective (ed. Susan J. Crockford). BAR International series 889: 271–285.

Larson G, Liu R, Zhao X et al. (2010) Patterns of East Asian pig domestication, migration, and turnover revealed by modern and ancient DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107(17): 7686–7691.

Lei CZ, Su R, Bower MA et al. (2009) Multiple maternal origins of native modern and ancient horse populations in China. Animal Genetics 40(6): 933–944.

Leonard JA, Wayne RK, Wheeler J et al. (2002) Ancient DNA evidence for Old World origin of New World dogs. Science 298(5598): 1613–1616.

Lindblad‐Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS et al. (2005) Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438: 803–819.

Linderholm A, Malmström H, Lidén K et al. (2008) Cryptic contamination and making phylogenetic nonsense. PLoS ONE 3(5): e2316.

Malmström H, Storå J, Dalén L et al. (2005) Extensive human DNA contamination in extracts from ancient dog bones and teeth. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22(10): 2040–2047.

Malmström H, Vilà C, Gilbert MT et al. (2008) Barking up the wrong tree: Modern northern European dogs fail to explain their origin. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 71.

Morey DF (2006) Burying key evidence: the social bond between dogs and people. Journal of Archaeological Science 33(2): 158–175.

Morin PA, Luikart G, Wayne RK and the SNP workshop group (2004) SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19(4): 208–216.

Musil R (2000) Evidence for the domestication of wolves in central European Magdalenian sites. In: Dogs through Time: An Archaeological Perspective (ed. Susan J. Crockford). BAR International series 889: 21–28.

Napierala H and Uerpmann H‐P (2010) A ‘New’ palaeolithic dog from Central Europe. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, early view [Epub ahead of print].

Natanaelsson C, Oskarsson MC, Angleby H et al. (2006) Dog Y chromosomal DNA sequence: identification, sequencing and SNP discovery. BMC Genetics 7: 45.

Nobis G (1979) Der älteste Haushund lebte vor 14000 Jahren. Umschau 79: 610.

Nowak RM (2003) Wolf evolution and taxonomy. In: Mech LD and Boitani L (eds) Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation, pp. 239–258. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Olsen SJ and Olsen JW (1977) The Chinese wolf, ancestor of New World dogs. Science 197(4303): 533–535.

Ostrander EA and Wayne RK (2005) The Canine genome. Genome Research 15: 1706–1716.

Pang JF, Kluetsch C, Zou XJ et al. (2009) mtDNA data indicate a single origin for dogs South of Yangtze River, less than 16,300 years ago, from numerous wolves. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26(12): 2849–2864.

Runstadler JA, Angles JM and Pedersen NC (2006) Dog leucocyte antigen class II diversity and relationships among indigenous dogs of the island nations of Indonesia (Bali), Australia and New Guinea. Tissue Antigens 68(5): 418–426.

Sablin MV and Khlopachev GA (2002) The earliest ice age dogs: evidence from Eliseevichi I. Current Anthropology 43(5): 795–799.

Savolainen P, Leitner T, Wilton AN et al. (2004) A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101(33): 12387–12390.

Savolainen P, Zhang YP, Luo J, Lundeberg J and Leitner T (2002) Genetic evidence of an East Asian origin of dogs. Science 298(5598): 1610–1613.

Street M (2002) Ein Wiedersehen mit dem Hund von Bonn Oberkassel. Bonner zoologische Beiträge 50(3): 269–290, (in German).

Sutter NB and Ostrander EA (2004) Dog star rising: the canine genetic system. Nature Review Genetics 5(12): 900–910.

Tchernov E and Valla FF (1997) Two new dogs, and other Natufian dogs, from the Southern Levant. Journal of Archaeological Science 24(1): 65–95.

Underhill AP (1997) Current issues in Chinese Neolithic Archaeology. Journal of World Prehistory 11(2): 103–160.

Verginelli F, Capelli C, Coia V et al. (2005) Mitochondrial DNA from prehistoric Canids highlights relationships between dogs and Southeast European wolves. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22(12): 2541–2551.

Vilà C, Savolainen P, Maldonado JE et al. (1997) Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276(5319): 1687–1689.

Wang X and Tedford RH (2008) Dogs, their Fossil Relatives and Evolutionary History. New York: Columbia University Press.

Wayne RK (1993) Molecular evolution of the dog family. Trends in Genetics 9(6): 218–224.

Wronski T and Macasero W (2008) Evidence for the persistence of Arabian Wolf (Canis lupus pallipes) in the Ibex Reserve, Saudi Arabia and its preferred prey species. Zoology in the Middle East 45: 11–18.

Zeder MA, Emshwiller E, Smith BD and Bradley DG (2006) Documenting domestication: the intersection of genetics and archaeology. Trends in Genetics 22(3): 139–155.

Further Reading

Barton L, Newsome SD, Chen F‐H et al. (2009) Agricultural origins and the isotopic identity of domestication in northern China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106(14): 5523–5528.

Benecke N (1987) Studies on early dog remains from Northern Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 14(1): 31–49.

Benecke N (1993) Zur Kenntnis der mesolithischen Hunde des südlichen Ostseegebietes. Zeitschrift für Archäologie 27: 39–65, (in German).

Ishiguro N, Inoshima Y and Shigehara N (2009) Mitochondrial DNA analysis of the Japanese wolf (Canis Lupus Hodophilax Temminck, 1839) and comparison with representative wolf and domestic dog haplotypes. Zoological Science 26(11): 765–770.

Morey DF (1994) The early evolution of the domestic dog. American Scientist 82(4): 336–347.

Ostrander EA, Giger U and Lindblad‐Toh K (eds) (2006) The Dog and Its Genome. Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Series 44, 584pp. Cold Spring Harbour, NY: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press.

Tanabe Y (1991) The Origin of Japanese dogs and their association with Japanese people. Zoological Science 8: 639–651.

Trut LN (1999) Early Canid domestication: The Farm‐Fox experiment. American Scientist 87(2): 160–169.

Trut LN, Plyusnina IZ and Oskina IN (2004) An experiment on fox domestication and debatable issues of evolution of the dog. Russian Journal of Genetics 40(6): 644–655.

Vigne JD (2005) L'humerus de chien magdalénien de Errala (Gipuzkoa, Espagne) et la domestication tardiglaciaire du loup en Europe. Munibe (Antropologia‐Arkeologia) 57(1): 279–287, (in French).

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Klütsch, Cornelya FC, and Savolainen, Peter(Apr 2011) Geographical Origin of the Domestic Dog. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0022867]