Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae

Abstract

Until recently, the chrysophytes were an algal group with mixed affinities and variable morphologies, united largely by their golden brown pigmentation. However, morphological and genetic studies have progressively removed many of the unaffiliated taxa, leaving two closely related classes, the Chrysophyceae sensu stricto and the Synurophyceae.

Both the classes contain freshwater and marine species, although are considered more abundant and diverse in oligotrophic waters in terrestrial habitats. Cells may be solitary or colonial, having unequal flagella (heterokont), with flagellar swellings on one or both flagella acting as photoreceptors. Taxa covered by siliceous scales are present in both classes, although silicified bristles are only present in some synurophytes. Some chrysophytes may form cellulosic, chitinous, siliceous or calcareous loricae instead of possessing scales. All taxa from both classes produce resting stages known as stomatocysts, with some species forming them during both asexual and sexual phases. Since stomatocysts, and to a lesser extent scales and bristles, are preserved in the underlying sediments, their fossil record is relatively well known, with the oldest stomatocysts found in Early Cretaceous sediments.

Fossil stomatocysts have proven very useful in palaeolimnological studies, particularly when reconstructing past nutrient levels, whereas their marine counterparts are a proxy for past sea‐ice distribution.

Key Concepts:

  • Genetic studies have shown that the Chrysophyceae sensu stricto and Synurophyceae are closely related, whereas the other taxa previously included in the Chrysophyceae sensu lato belong to different algal classes.

  • Chrysophytes and synurophytes are heterokont algae, with a long ‘flimmer’ flagellum and a short ‘whiplash’ flagellum and with flagellar swellings on one or both flagella.

  • Fucoxanthin is the main pigment responsible for their ‘golden brown’ colouration.

  • Cells may possess silicified scales (but only synurophytes have bristles) produced by Golgi‐derived vesicles.

  • Scale and bristle morphology appears to be species‐specific and is thus a key criterion in the identification of the taxa.

  • Silicified resting stages bearing a plugged pore (stomatocysts) are unique to the Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae, and may also be species‐specific.

  • Stomatocysts are often preserved in the underlying sediments, and have been used as palaeoenvironmental indicators.

  • The oldest stomatocysts were found in Early Cretaceous marine sediments from the Southern Ocean, whereas the oldest silicified scales and bristles were found in Middle Eocene freshwater sediments from northwest Canada.

Keywords: archaeomonads; chrysophytes; fucoxanthin; heterokont; loricae; siliceous scales; stomatocysts; synurophytes

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of a sectioned cell of Ochromonas sp.: (a) contractile vacuole; (b) Golgi body; (c) nucleus (containing the nucleolus); (d) chloroplast, with four membranes and a girdle lamella enclosing the other lamellae (stacks of three thylakoids); (e) mitochondrion; (f) eyespot (as cluster of red lipid globules containing carotenoid pigments); (g) short ‘whiplash’ flagellum (note flagellar swelling); (h) flagellar basal body; (i) long ‘flimmer’ flagellum; (j) mastigonemes; (k) chrysolaminaran vesicle.

Figure 2.

Photomicrographs of living chrysophytes (a–b) and synurophytes (c–f) from Kenmin‐no‐mori, Yamagata Prefecture, Japan. (a) Loricate colony of Dinobryon sp., LM (Lake Arenuma); (b) colony of Uroglena sp. with each cell possessing a red eyespot, LM (Lake Itabashinuma); (c) cell of Mallomonas caudata with cell covered by scales and bristles, LM (Lake Hannokinuma, small pond); (d) high magnification of scales and bristles of Mallomonas caudata, SEM (Lake Itabashinuma); (e) colony of Synura petersenii, LM (Lake Kokenuma); (f) colony of Synura petersenii with cells covered by siliceous scales, helically arranged, SEM (Lake Kokenuma). Taken by Kazuya Takahashi.

Figure 3.

Archaeomonad stomatocysts, showing a variety of surface ornamentation (e.g. smooth, ridges, warts, perforations, spines) as well as forms with or without a collar. Scale bars=1 μm. (a, f, h) IODP 302‐2A‐54X‐1, 32–33 cm (Middle Eocene, Arctic Ocean); (c, g) IODP 302‐2A‐55X‐2, 142–143 cm (Middle Eocene, Arctic Ocean); (d) IODP 302‐4A‐11X‐1, 93–94 cm (Middle Eocene, Arctic Ocean); (b, e) Cesar 6, 190–192 cm (Late Cretaceous, Arctic Ocean). Taken by Susumu Konno.

close

References

Adam DP and Mahood AD (1981) Chrysophyte cysts as potential environmental indicators. Geological Society of America Bulletin, Part I 92: 839–844.

Allison CW and Hilgert JW (1986) Scale microfossils from the early Cambrian of Northwest Canada. Journal of Paleontology 60: 973–1015.

Andersen RA (2004) A historical review of heterokont phylogeny. Japanese Journal of Phycology 52: 153–162.

Beech PL, Wetherbee R and Pickett‐Heaps JD (1990) Secretion and deployment of bristles in Mallomonas splendens (Synurophyceae). Journal of Phycology 26: 112–122.

Boo SM, Kim HS, Shin W et al. (2010) Complex phylogenetic patterns in the freshwater alga Synura provide new insights into ubiquity vs. endemism in microbial eukaryotes. Molecular Ecology 19: 4328–4338.

Bourrelly P (1957) Recherches sur les Chrysophycées. Morphology, Phylogénie, Systématique. Revue Algologique, New Series 1: 1–412.

Bourrelly P (1963) Loricae and cysts in the Chrysophyceae. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 108: 421–429.

Bourrelly P (1965) La classification des chrysophycées: ses problèmes. Revue Algologique, New Series 8: 56–60.

Brown JW and Sorhannus U (2010) A molecular genetic timescale for the diversification of autotrophic Stramenopiles (Ochrophyta): substantive underestimation of putative fossil ages. PLoS One 5(9): e12759 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012759.

Conrad W (1938) Notes protistologiques VI. Kystes des chrysomonadines ou chrysostomatacées? Bulletin de Musée royal d'Histoire naturelle de Belgique 14: 1–6.

Cronberg G (1986) Chrysophycean cysts and scales in lake sediments: a review. In: Kristiansen J and Andersen RA (eds) Chrysophytes: Aspects and Problems, pp. 281–315. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Deflandre G (1932) Archaeomonadaceae, une famille nouvelle de Protistes fossiles marins à loge siliceuse. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 194: 1859–1861.

Harris K (1970) Imperfect forms and the taxonomy of Mallomonas. Journal of General Microbiology 61: 73–76.

Harwood DM and Gersonde R (1990) Lower Cretaceous diatoms from ODP Leg 113, Site 693 (Weddell Sea). Part 2: resting spores, chrysophycean cysts, endoskeletal dinoflagellates, and notes on the origin of diatoms. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results 113: 403–426.

Herth W, Kuppel A and Schnepf E (1977) Chitinous fibrils in the lorica of the flagellate chrysophyte Poteriochromonas stipitata (syn. Ochromonas malhamensis). Journal of Cell Biology 73: 311–321.

Herth W and Zugenmaier P (1979) The lorica of Dinobryon. Journal of Ultrastructural Research 69: 262–272.

Ikävalko J (2001) On the presence of some selected Heterokontophyta (Chrysophyceae, Dictyochophyceae, Bicocoecida) and cysts (“archaeomonads”) from sea ice – a synopsis. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 122: 41–54.

Klaveness D, Bråte J, Patil V et al. (2011) The 18S and 28S rDNA identity and phylogeny of the common lotic chrysophyte Hydrurus foetidus. European Journal of Phycology 46: 282–291.

Kristiansen J (1979) Problems in classification and identification of Synuraceae (Chrysophyceae). Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Hydrobiologie 40: 310–319.

Kristiansen J (2001) Biogeography of silica‐scaled chrysophytes. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 122: 23–39.

Kurata A (1986) Blooms of Uroglena americana in relation to concentrations of B group vitamins. In: Kristiansen J and Andersen RA (eds) Chrysophytes: Aspects and Problems, pp. 185–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kurata A (1989) The relationship between metal concentrations and Uroglena americana blooms in Lake Biwa, Japan. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 95: 119–129.

Leadbeater BSC (1986) Scale case construction in Synura petersenii Korsch (Chrysophyceae). In: Kristiansen J and Andersen RA (eds) Chrysophytes: Aspects and Problems, pp. 121–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Macdonald FA, Cohen PA, Dudás FO and Schrag DP (2010) Early Neoproterozoic scale microfossils in the Lower Tindir Group of Alaska and the Yukon Territory. Geology 38: 143–146.

Manton I and Harris K (1966) Observations on the microanatomy of the brown flagellate Sphaleromantis tetragona Skuja with special reference to the flagellar apparatus and scales. Journal of the Linnean Society (Botany) 59: 397–403.

Miller EA, Lind JL and Wetherbee R (1996) The scale‐associated molecules of Mallomonas spp. (Synurophyceae) are immunologically distinct. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 114: 45–55.

Mitchell JG and Silver MS (1982) Modern archaeomonads indicate sea‐ice environment. Nature 296: 437–439.

Nygaard G (1956) Ancient and recent flora of diatoms and Chrysophyceae in Lake Gribsø. Folia Limnologica Scandinavica 8: 32–94.

Pascher A (1913) Chrysomonadinae. In: Pascher A (ed.) Die Süsswasserflora Deutschlands, Österreich und der Schweiz, vol. 2, pp. 7–95. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

Pascher A (1914) Über Flagellaten und Algen. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 32: 136–160.

Patterson DJ (1989) Stramenopiles: chromophytes from a protistan perspective. In: Green JC, Leadbeater BSC and Diver WL (eds) The Chromophyte Algae Problems and Perspectives, pp. 357–379. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Pipes LD and Leedale GF (1992) Scale formation in Tessellaria volvocina (Synurophyceae). British Phycological Journal 27: 11–19.

Rull V and Vegas‐Vilarrúbia T (2000) Chrysophycean stomatocysts in a Caribbean mangrove. Hydrobiologia 428: 145–150.

Sandgren CD (1981) Characteristics of sexual and asexual resting cyst (statospore) formation in Dinobryon cylindricum Imhof (Chrysophyta). Journal of Phycology 17: 199–210.

Sandgren CD (1983) Survival strategies of chrysophycean flagellates: reproduction and formation of resistant resting cells. In: Fryxell GA (ed.) Survival Strategies of the Algae, pp. 23–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sandgren CD (1989) SEM investigations of statospore (stomatocyst) development in diverse members of the Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 95: 45–69.

Sandgren CD and Carney HJ (1983) A flora of fossil chrysophycean cysts from the recent sediments of Frains Lake, Michigan, USA. Nova Hedwigia 38: 129–163.

Siver PA (1995) The distribution of chrysophytes along environmental gradients: their use as biological indicators. In: Sandgren CD, Smol JP and Kristiansen J (eds) Chrysophyte Algae: Ecology, Phylogeny and Development, pp. 232–268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Siver PA and Wolfe AP (2005) Scaled chrysophytes in Middle Eocene lake sediments from Northwestern Canada, including descriptions of six new species. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 128: 295–308.

Smol JP (1984) The statospore of Mallomonas pseudocoronata (Mallomonadaceae, Chrysophyceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 4: 827–831.

Smol JP (1988) Chrysophycean microfossils in paleolimnological studies. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 62: 287–297.

Smol JP, Charles DF and Whitehead DR (1984) Mallomonadacean microfossils provide evidence of recent lake acidification. Nature 307: 628–630.

Stoecker DK, Gustafson DE, Baier CT and Black MMD (2000) Primary production in the upper sea ice. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 21: 275–287.

Takahashi E, Watanabe K and Satoh H (1986) Siliceous cysts from Kita‐no‐seto Strait, north of Syowa Station, Antarctica. Memoirs of the National Institute of Polar Research, Special Issue 40: 84–95.

Unrein F, Gasol JM and Massana R (2010) Dinobryon faculiferum (Chrysophyta) in coastal Mediterranean seawater: presence and grazing impact on bacteria. Journal of Plankton Research 32: 559–564.

Watson SB, Satchwill T and McCauley E (2001) Drinking water taste and odour: a chrysophyte perspective. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 122: 119–146.

Wetherbee R and Andersen RA (1992) Flagella of chrysophycean algae play an active role in prey capture and selection. Direct observations on Epipyxis pulchra using image enhanced video microscopy. Protoplasma 166: 1–7.

Whitehead DR, Charles DF, Jackson ST, Smol JP and Engstrom DR (1989) The developmental history of Adirondack (N.Y.) lakes. Journal of Paleolimnology 2: 185–206.

Wolowski K, Piatek J and Plachno BJ (2011) Algae and stomatocysts associated with carnivorous plants. First report of chrysophyte stomatocysts from Virginia, USA. Phycologia 50: 511–519.

Zhang X, Watanabe M and Inoue I (1996) Light and electron microscopy of grazing by Poterioochromonas malhamensis (Chrysophyceae) on a range of phytoplankton taxa. Journal of Phycology 32: 37–46.

Further Reading

Andersen RA (1987) The Synurophyceae classis nov., a new class of algae. American Journal of Botany 74: 337–353.

Cronberg G and Sandgren CD (1986) A proposal for the development of standardized nomenclature and terminology for chrysophycean statospores. In: Kristiansen J and Andersen RA (eds) Chrysophytes: Aspects and Problems, pp. 317–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duff KE, Zeeb BA and Smol JP (1995) Atlas of Chrysophycean Cysts. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 189 pp.

Kristiansen J (2005) Golden Algae. Ruggell: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., 167 pp.

Kristiansen J and Preisig HR (2001) Encyclopedia of Chrysophyta Genera. Bibliotheca Phycologica 110: 1–260.

Lee RE (2008) Phycology. New York: Cambridge University Press. 547 pp.

Smol JP (1985) The ratio of diatom frustules to chrysophycean statospores: a useful paleolimnological index. Hydrobiologia 123: 199–208.

Takahashi E (1978) Electron microscopical studies of the Synuraceae (Chrysophyceae) in Japan. Tokyo: Tokai University Press. 194 pp.

Wilkinson AN, Zeeb BA and Smol JP (2001) Atlas of Chrysophycean Cysts Volume II. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 180 pp.

Yoon HS, Andersen RA, Boo SM and Bhattacharya D (2011) Stramenopiles. In: Schaechter M (ed.) Eukaryotic Microbes, pp. 373–384. Oxford: Elsevier.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Jordan, Richard W, and Iwataki, Mitsunori(Mar 2012) Chrysophyceae and Synurophyceae. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0023690]