Genome Evolution in Yeasts


Used empirically over millennia for a variety of fermentation processes, the microscopic yeasts representing unicellular forms of modern fungi adapted to a large diversity of habitats have become powerful model organisms to understand eukaryotic genome evolution. Their broad evolutionary range offers unique views on both short‐ and long‐term genomic changes, with the possibility to confront observations with experimental results. Processes of duplications, gene loss and gene creation form the bases of genome evolution, along with horizontal acquisitions and an unexpectedly high frequency of interspecies hybridisations. This short review summarises our present knowledge about genome evolution focussing on the subphylum of budding yeasts or , by far the most extensively studied lineage, without ignoring the multiphyletic origin of yeasts.

Key Concepts

  • Yeasts represent long‐evolved unicellular forms of modern fungi, adapted to rapid clonal expansions under favourable conditions, not primitive eukaryotes.
  • Over 1600 yeast species are presently described in the different subphyla of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, within which the budding yeasts (Saccharomycotina) represent the largest deep‐branching lineage useful for genome evolution studies.
  • The different genome architectures of well‐circumscribed subgroups of Saccharomycotina indicate major evolutionary divides within which ancient events can be inferred.
  • Important modifications of the role of RNA occurred at the origin of Saccharomycotina (massive loss of spliceosomal introns and loss of RNAi control) and continued during their evolution (fixation of 5S RNA gene, change of deciphering mode and significance for synonymous codons).
  • All yeast genomes exhibit significant levels of redundancy, reflecting small‐scale duplications and, in one lineage, a whole‐genome duplication followed by extensive gene loss.
  • The balance between gene gains and losses accelerated yeast genome evolution beyond sequence divergence and chromosomal dynamics.
  • Novel genes regularly appeared during yeast genome evolution, resulting from duplication followed by sequence divergence, horizontal acquisition and de novo gene creation.
  • Interspecies hybridisation is a common phenomenon.
  • Resolution of hybrid genomes suggests an important role for interspecific exchanges in evolution.

Keywords: sequence; orphan gene; synteny; gene loss; duplication; hybrid; introgression; centromere; telomere; polymorphism

Figure 1. Yeast genomics 10 years ago. Sequenced yeast genomes at the end of 2004 with original references: (1) Goffeau et al. (), (2) Wood et al. (), (3) Kellis et al. (), (4) Dietrich et al. (), (5) Jones et al. () and (6) Dujon et al. (). Available data distinguished four major types of genome architectures (coloured backgrounds), suggesting deep evolutionary divides between them. Species designation and tree topology (arbitrary branch lengths) are according to Kurtzman et al. (). Blue, red and purple arrows point to major evolutionary events reconstituted from parsimony: WGD, whole‐genome duplication; CTG, alteration of genetic code; LCM, loss of genes for complex I of the respiratory chain in mitochondrial DNA.
Figure 2. Taxon sampling of sequenced yeast species. Pie charts represent the distribution of yeast species in different subphyla of (blue) and (green). (a) Total of 1576 species described in Kurtzman et al. (). (b) Total of 66 sequenced yeast species (59 yeasts compiled from Tables and , plus 7 yeasts, not shown). Hybrids were ignored.
Figure 3. Major genome architectures in and global reconstruction of major evolutionary events Tree topology is adapted from Kurtzman et al. (2011) . Left column: major subgroups defined from genome architectures and proteome comparisons (Figure). symbolises outgroup. Central column: most representative species (Tables and ). Right column: major genomic characteristics. Circled numbers indicate major evolutionary changes deduced from genomic data using maximal parsimony. 0, extensive loss of spliceosomal introns and partial loss of RNAi control machinery at the very origin of ; 1, reduction of rDNA locus number and fixation of 5S rRNA gene in them, switch to bacterial decoding mode for Arg CGN codons and selection for increased genome compactness; 2, additional loss of spliceosomal introns, acquisition of point centromeres, switch to bacterial decoding mode for Leu CUN codons, triplication of mating cassettes and loss of complex I genes in mtDNA; 3, additional loss of spliceosomal introns and acquisition of novel Ser tRNA reading CUG codons; 4, whole genome duplication.
Figure 4. Clustering the members of subdivisions from pairwise comparisons between predicted proteomes. The figure illustrates the two first factorial planes, representing together 40% of the total information of a pair‐wise comparison matrix between sequence‐predicted proteomes of 40 selected fungal genomes, after correspondence analysis. Each point corresponds to one fungal genome sequence (symbols in insert). Note the distribution of members in four separate clusters (blue, purple, green and orange backgrounds, respectively) corresponding to major subdivisions defined from global genomic anatomies (see text), and their clear‐cut separation from other subphyla and from Adapted with permission from Morales et al. (2013), © Oxford University Press.
Figure 5. Interplay between major mechanisms of genome evolution in yeasts. The yellow circle symbolises yeast genomes with their elements (protein‐coding genes, protogenes, pseudogenes, genes for non‐coding RNAs and retrotransposons). Internal grey circles symbolise the two major evolutionary clocks, governing sequence divergence (outer circle with red arrows) and loss of gene synteny (inner circle with blue arrows). See text for details. Shown by blue arrows are the major evolutionary mechanisms acting on genomes and their genetic elements: (1) small‐scale duplications (SSD), (2) horizontal gene acquisition (red donor), (3) gene loss, (4) gene formation, (5) autopolyploidisation (WGD) and (6) allopolyploidisation (hybrid formation between green and yellow genomes). Small cartoons represent the traces left in genomes by each mechanism. Small rectangles illustrate genes along chromosomes (lines), purple rectangles ancestral genome and blue rectangles evolved genome. Traces of SSD are transferred in the two inserts at the bottom of the figure for clarity. The figure stresses the fact that RNA intermediates ignore chromosomal rearrangements, whereas protogenes and pseudogenes do not and are only separated from actual genes by sequence changes. Processed pseudogenes were not found in yeast genomes.


Annaluru N, Muller H, Mitchell LA, et al. (2014) Total synthesis of a functional designer eukaryotic chromosome. Science 344: 55–58.

Bleykasten‐Grosshans C and Neuvéglise C (2011) Transposable elements in yeasts. Comptes Rendus Biologies 334 (8–9): 679–686.

Bernstein DA, Vyas VK and Fink GR (2012) Genes come and go: The evolutionarily plastic path of budding yeast RNase III enzymes. RNA Biology 9: 1123–1128.

Borneman AR, Zeppel R, Chambers PJ, Curtin CD, et al. (2014) Insights into the Dekkera bruxellensis genomic landscape: comparative genomics reveals variations in ploidy and nutrient utilisation potential amongst wine isolates. PLoS Genetics 10 (2): e1004161.

Burger G, Gray MW and Lang BF (2003) Mitochondrial genomes: anything goes. Trends in Genetics 19 (12): 709–716.

Butler G, Rasmussen MD, Lin MF, et al. (2009) Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 459: 657–662.

Cai J, Zhao R, Jiang H and Wang W (2008) De novo origination of a new protein‐coding gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179: 487–496.

Carvunis A‐R, Rolland T, Wapinski I, et al. (2012) Proto‐genes and de novo gene birth. Nature 487: 370–374.

Cliften PF, Fultom RS, Wilson RK and Johnston M (2006) After the duplication: gene loss and adaptation in saccharomyces genomes. Genetics 172: 863–872

Conant GC and Wolfe KH (2006) Functional partitioning of yeast co‐expression networks after genome duplication. PLoS Biology 4: e109.

Cuomo CA, Rodriguez‐Del Valle N, Perez‐Sanchez L, et al. (2014) Genome sequence of the pathogenic fungus Sporothrix schenckii (ATCC 58251). Genome Announcements 2 (3): e00446‐14.

Curtin CD, Borneman AR, Chambers PJ and Pretorius IS (2012) De‐novo assembly and analysis of the heterozygous triploid genome of the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera bruxellensis AWRI1499. PLoS One 7 (3): e33840.

Crauwels S, Zhu B, Steensels J, et al. (2014) Assessing genetic diversity among Brettanomyces yeasts by DNA fingerprinting and whole‐genome sequencing. Applied Environ. Microbiology 80 (14): 4398–4413.

De Schutter K, Lin YC, Tiels P, et al. (2009) Genome sequence of the recombinant protein production host Pichia pastoris. Nature Biotechnology 27: 561–566.

Dietrich FS, Voegeli S, Brachat S, et al. (2004) The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science 304: 304–307.

Drillon G and Fischer G (2011) Comparative study on synteny between yeasts and vertebrates. Comptes rendus Biologies 334: 629–638.

Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, et al (2004) Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 430: 35–44.

Dujon B (2006) Yeasts illustrate the molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic genome evolution. Trends in Genetics 22: 375–387.

Dujon B (2010) Yeast evolutionary genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 11: 512–524.

Erny C, Raoult P, Alais A, et al. (2012) Ecological success of a group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae/Saccharomyces kudriavzevii hybrids in the northern European wine‐making environment. Applied Environ. Microbiology 78 (9): 3256–3265.

Fares MA, Keane OM, Toft C, Carrero‐Paulet L and Jones GW (2013) The roles of whole‐genome and small‐scale duplications in the functional specialization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes. PLoS Genetics 9 (1): e1003176.

Fischer G, Rocha EP, Brunet F, Vergassola M and Dujon B (2006) Highly variable rates of genome rearrangements between hemiascomycetous yeast lineages. PLoS Genetics 2 (3): e32.

Frank AC and Wolfe KH (2009) Evolutionary capture of viral and plasmid DNA by yeast nuclear chromosomes. Eukaryotic Cell 8 (10): 1521–1531.

Gabaldon T, Martin T, Marcet‐Houben M, et al. (2013) Comparative genomics of emerging pathogens in the Candida glabrata clade. BMC Genomics 14: 623.

Galeote V, Bigey F, Beyne E, et al. (2011) Amplification of a Zygosaccharomyces bailii DNA segment in wine yeast genomes by extrachromosomal circular DNA formation. PLoS One 6: e17872.

Galeote V, Bigey F, Devillers H, Neuvéglise C and Deqsuin S (2013) Genome sequence of the food spoilage yeast Zygosccharomyces bailii CLIB 213T. Genome Announcements 1 (4): e00606–13.

Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, et al. (1996) Life with 6000 genes. Science 274: 563–567.

Gojdovic Z, Knecht W, Zameitat E, et al. (2004) Horizontal gene transfer promoted evolution of the ability to propagate under anaerobic conditions in yeasts. Molecular Genetics & Genomics 271: 387–393.

Gordon JL and Wolfe KH (2008) Recent allopolyploid origin of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii strain ATCC 42981. Yeast 25: 449–456.

Gordon JL, Byrne KP and Wolfe KH (2009) Additions, losses and rearrangements on the evolutionary route from a reconstructed ancestor to the modern Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. PLoS Genetics 5: e1000485.

Gordon JL, Armisén D, Proux‐Wéra E, et al. (2011a) Evolutionary erosion of yeast sex chromosomes by mating‐type switching accidents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 20024–20029.

Gordon JL, Byrne KP and Wolfe KH (2011b) Mechanisms of chromosome number evolution in yeast. PLoS Genetics 7 (7): e1002190.

Grosjean H, de Crecy‐Lagard V and Marck C (2010) Deciphering synonymous codons in the three domains of life: co‐evolution with specific tRNA modification enzymes. FEBS Letters 584: 252–264.

Hanson SJ, Byrne KP and Wolfe KH (2014) Mating‐type switching by chromosomal inversion in methylotrophic yeasts suggests an origin for the three‐locus Saccharomyces cerevisiae system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: E4851–E4858.

Hittinger CT, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP, et al. (2010) Remarkably ancient balanced polymorphisms in a multi‐locus gene network. Nature 464: 54–58.

Hooks KB, Delneri D and Griffiths‐Jones S (2014) Intron evolution in Saccharomycetaceae. Genome Biology and Evolution 6 (9): 2543–2556.

Jackson AP, Gamble JA, Yeomans T, et al. (2009) Comparative genomics of the fungal pathogens Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans. Genome Research 19: 2231–2244.

Jeffries TW, Grigoriev IV, Grimwood J, et al. (2007) Genome sequence of the lignocellulose‐bioconverting and xylose‐fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Nature Biotechnology 25: 319–326.

Jones T, Federspiel NA, Chibana H, et al. (2004) The diploid genome sequence of Candida albicans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 7329–7334.

Kellis M, Birren BW, Lander ES, et al. (2004) Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428: 617–624.

Koszul R and Fischer G (2009) A prominent role for segmental duplications in modelling eukaryotic genomes. Comptes Rendus Biologies 332: 254–266.

Kuberl A, Schneider J, Thallinger GG, et al. (2011) High‐quality genome sequence of Pichia pastoris CBS7435. Journal of Biotechnology 154: 312–320.

Kunze G, Gaillardin C, Czernicka M, et al. (2014) The complete genome of Blastobotrys (Arxula) adeninivorans LS3 – a yeast of biotechnological interest. Biotechnology for Biofuels 7: 66.

Kurtzman CP, Fell JW and Boekhout T (2011) The Yeasts. A Taxonomic Study, 5th edn. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Lafontaine I and Dujon B (2010) Origin and fate of pseudogenes in Hemiascomycetes: a comparative analysis. BMC Genomics 11: 260.

Leh‐Louis V, Despons L, Friedrich A, et al. (2012) Pichia sorbitophila, an interspecies yeast hybrid, reveals early steps of genome resolution after polyploidization. G3 2: 299–311.

Li D, Dong Y, Jiang Y, et al. (2010) A de novo originated gene depresses budding yeast mating pathway and is repressed by the protein encoded by its antisense strand. Cell Research 20 (4): 408–420.

Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valério E, et al. (2011) Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager‐brewing yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 (35): 14539–14544.

Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, et al. (2009) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337–341.

Liti G, Nguyen Ba AN, Blythe M, et al. (2013) High quality de novo sequencing and assembly of the Saccharomyces arboricolus genome. BMC Genomics 14: 69.

Liu L and Halper HS (2014) Draft genome sequence of the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica PO1f, a commonly used metabolic engineering host. Genome Announcements 2 (4): e00652‐14.

Liu X, Kaas RS, Jensen R and Workman M (2012) Draft genome sequence of the yeast Pachysolen tannophilus CBS4044/NRRL Y‐2460. Eukaryotic Cell 11 (6): 827.

Lobo FP, Gonçalves DL, Alves SL Jr et al. (2014) Draft genome sequence of the D‐xylose‐fermenting yeast Spathaspora arborariae UFMG‐HM19.1AT. Genome Announcements 2 (1): e01163‐13.

Lynch M and Conery JS (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151–1155.

Lynch M, Sung W, Morris K, et al. (2008) A genome‐wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 9272–9277.

Malik HS and Henikoff S (2009) Major evolutionary transitions in centromere complexity. Cell 138: 1067–1082.

Meraldi P, McAinsch AD, Rheinaby E and Sorger PK (2006) Phylogenetic and structural analysis of centromeric DNA and kinetochore proteins. Genome Biology 7: R23.

Mattanovich D, Graf A, Stadlmann J, et al. (2009) Genome, secretome and glucose transport highlight unique features of the protein production host Pichia pastoris. Microbial Cell Factories 8: 29.

Mira NP, Münsterkötter M, Dias‐Valada F, et al. (2014) The genome sequence of the highly acetic‐tolerant Zygosaccharomyces bailii‐derived interspecies hybrid strain ISA1307, isolated from a sparkling wine plant. DNA Research 21: 299–313.

Mishra PK, Baum M and Carbon J (2007) Centromere size and position in Candida albicans are evolutionary conserved independent of DNA sequence heterogeneity. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 278: 455–465.

Morales L and Dujon B (2012) Evolutionary role of interspecies hybridization and genetic exchanges in yeasts. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 76 (4): 721–739.

Morales L, Noel B, Porcel B, et al. (2013) Complete DNA sequence of Kuraishia capsulata illustrates novel genomic features among budding yeasts (Saccharomycotina). Genome Biology and Evolution 5 (12): 2524–2539.

Nakao Y, Kanamori T, Itoh T, et al. (2009) Genome sequence of the lager brewing yeast, an interspecies hybrid. DNA Research 16 (2): 115–129.

Neuvéglise C, Marck C and Gaillardin C (2011) The intronome of budding yeasts. Comptes Rendus Biologies 334 (8–9): 662–670.

Nguyen HV, Legras J‐L, Neuvéglise C and Gaillardin C (2011) Deciphering the hybridization history leading to the Lager lineage based on the mosaic genomes of Saccharomyces bayanus strains NBRC1948 and CBS380. PLoS One 6 (10): e25821.

Nishant KT, Wei W, Mancera E, et al. (2010) The baker's yeast diploid genome is remarkably stable in vegetative growth and meiosis. PLoS Genetics 6 (9): e1001109.

Peris D, Lopes CA, Arias A and Barrio E (2012) Reconstruction of the evolutionary history of Saccharomyces cerevisiae x S. kudriavzevii hybrids based on multilocus sequence analysis. PLoS One 7 (9): e45527.

Piskur J, Ling Z, Marcet‐Houben M, et al (2012) The genome of wine yeast Dekkera bruxellensis provides a tool to explore its food‐related properties. International Journal of Food Microbiology 157: 202–209.

Pryszcz LP, Nemeth T, Gacser A and Gabaldon T (2014) Genome comparison of Candida orthopsilosis clinical strains reveal the existence of hybrids between two distinct subspecies. Genome Biology and Evolution 6 (5): 1069–1078.

Ravin NV, Eldarov MA, Kadnikov VV, et al. (2013) Genome sequence and analysis of methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha DL1. BMC Genomics 14: 837.

Rhind N, Chen Z, Yassour M, et al. (2011) Comparative functional genomics of fission yeasts. Science 332: 930–936.

Riccombeni A, Vidanes G, Proux‐Wéra E, et al. (2012) Sequence and analysis of the genome of the pathogenic yeast Candida orthopsilosis. PLoS One 7 (4): e35750.

Rolland T and Dujon B (2011) Yeasty clocks: dating genomic changes in yeasts. Comptes Rendus Biologies 334: 620–628.

Santos MAS, Gomes AC, Santos MC, et al. (2011) The genetic code of the fungal CTG clade. Comptes Rendus Biologies 334 (8–9): 607–611.

Scannell DR, Frank AC, Conant GC, et al. (2007) Independent sorting‐out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole‐genome duplication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (20): 8397–8402.

Scannell DR, Zill OA, Rokas A, et al. (2011) The awesome power of yeast evolutionary genetics: new genome sequences and strain resources for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto genus. G3 1 (1): 11–25.

Schacherer J, Tourrette Y, Souciet JL, et al. (2004) Recoverey of a function involving gene duplication by retroposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Research 14 (7): 1291–1297.

Seoighe C, Federspiel N, Jones T, et al. (2000) Prevalence of small inversions in yeast gene order evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97 (26): 14433–14437.

Souciet J‐L, Aigle M, Artiguenave F, et al (2000) Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts. FEBS Letters 487: 3–149.

Souciet J‐L, Dujon B, Gaillardin C, et al. (2009) Comparative genomics of protoploid Saccharomycetaceae. Genome Research 19: 1696–1709.

Suzuki T, Hoshino T and Matsushica A (2014) Draft genome sequence of Kluyveromyces marxianus Strain DMB1, isolated from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate. Genome Announcements 2 (4): e00733‐14.

Taylor DJ and Bruenn J (2009) The evolution of novel fungal genes from non‐retroviral RNA viruses. BMC Biology 7: 88.

Thierry A, Khanna V, Créno S, et al. (2015) Macrotene chromosomes provide insights to a new mechanism of high‐order gene amplification in eukaryotes. Nature Communications 6: 6154.

Tomita Y, Ikeo K, Tamakawa H, et al. (2012) Genome and transcriptome analysis of the food‐yeast Candida utilis. PLoS One 7 (5): e37226.

Wahlter A, Hesselbart A and Wendland J (2014) Genome sequence of Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, the world's first pure culture lager yeasts. G3 4: 783–793.

Wendland J and Walther A (2011) Genome evolution in the Eremothecium clade of the Saccharomyces complex revealed by comparative genomics. G3 1: 539–548.

Wendland J and Walther A (2014) Chromosome number reduction in Eremothecium coryli by two telomere‐to‐teleomere fusions. Genome Biology and Evolution 6 (5): 1186–1198.

Wohlbach DJ, Kuo A, Sato TK, et al. (2011) Comparative genomics of xylose‐fermenting fungi for enhanced biofuel production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 (32): 13212–13217.

Wolfe KH and Shields DC (1997) Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387: 708–713.

Wood V, Gwilliam R, Rajandream MA, et al. (2002) The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature 415: 871–880.

Wong H, Marie‐Nelly H, Herbert S, et al. (2012) A predictive computational model of the dynamic 3D interphase yeast nucleus. Current Biology 22 (20): 1881–1890.

Wong S and Wolfe KH (2005) Birth of a metabolic gene cluster in yeast by adaptive gene relocation. Nature Genetics 37 (7): 777–782.

Further Reading

Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, et al. (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425–431.

Dujon B (2011) Ten years of genomic exploration in eukaryotes: strategy and progress of Génolevures. (Thematic issue). Comptes Rendus Biologies 334: 577–693.

Feldman H (2012) Yeast. Molecular and Cell Biology, 2nd edn, pp. 444. Wiley‐Blackwell.

Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, et al. (2007) A higher‐level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycological Research 111: 509–547.

Hittinger CT (2013) Saccharomyces diversity and evolution: a budding model genus. Trends in Genetics 29 (5): 309–311.

Neme R and Tautz D (2011) Phylogenetic patterns of emergence of new genes support a model of frequent de novo evolution. BMC Genomics 14: 117.

Proux‐Wera E, Byrne KP and Wolfe KH (2013) Evolutionary mobility of the ribosomal DNA array in yeasts. Genome Biology and Evolution 5 (3): 525–531.

Schacherer J, Shapiro JA, Ruderfer DM, Kruglyak L, et al. (2009) Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458: 342–345.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Dujon, Bernard(Apr 2015) Genome Evolution in Yeasts. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0023986]