Sex Differences in Disease Genetics

Abstract

There is long‐standing evidence for the gene‐by‐sex interactions in disease risk, which can now be tested in genome‐wide association studies with participant numbers in the hundreds of thousands. The current methods start with a separate test for each sex, but a more powerful approach is to use sex as an interaction term in a combined sample. The most compelling evidence is for adiposity (predictive of cardiac disease) as well as type II diabetes, asthma and inflammatory bowel disease. Autism exhibits a different kind of sex difference, with hypermasculinisation of the brain, and the intriguing enrichment of structural variants in females. Sexually dimorphic gene expression varies exquisitely and unexpectedly, by tissue, age and chromosome, so sex‐dependent genetic effects are expected for a wide range of diseases. Because natural selection against sex‐dependent risk alleles is in one sex only, their effect size is expected to be greater than conventional risk loci.

Key Concepts

  • Compelling findings of sex‐dependent genetic effects on disease have been made in adiposity‐related anthropometric traits, type II diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease, and other disorders remain to be more fully investigated, regardless of what sexual dimorphism they exhibit in prevalence and presentation.
  • Initial evidence indicates that sex difference in gene expression is not required for a sex‐dependent genetic effect on gene expression. However, sex differences in expression levels vary dynamically by tissue type and age, so such generalisations may be inaccurate, without more comprehensive data.
  • Sex‐dependent risk alleles are predicted to be of greater effect size than conventional ones, because natural selection acts only against the sex which has the disease. There is evidence for this from a high‐powered GWAS of adiposity‐related traits.
  • Sexual dimorphism in gene expression seems likely to fall into different categories, and thus categorisation of sex‐dependent genetic effects is expected to follow the same patterns.
  • Many of the large GWAS meta‐analyses look for sex‐dependent genetic effects by testing male and female groups separately. However, this may be underpowered compared to a whole‐sample, gene‐by‐sex interaction test.

Keywords: disease; genetics; sex; gender; GxS; GWAS; genomics; adiposity; autoimmunity

Figure 1. Disability‐adjusted life years (DALY) by age group and sex, for selected causes. Source data is from the global human population, year 2012 (WHO, ). The causes were selected to show diverse and interesting patterns of sex differences. The arrangement of plots is by increasing DALY from left to right, and vertically by sex difference. Note the y‐axis scale difference between plots, so that for Stroke (top‐left), the DALY is 1 million greater in middle‐aged men than in women.
Figure 2. Male and female effect sizes of loci for waist‐hip ratio (adjusted by body‐mass index) in a genome‐wide association study of 224 459 participants (Shungin et al., ). Loci which were calculated to have significant sex‐dependent effects are coloured; red for females and blue for males.
close

References

Adamaki M, Lambrou GI, Athanasiadou A, et al. (2015) HOXA9 and MEIS1 gene overexpression in the diagnosis of childhood acute leukemias: significant correlation with relapse and overall survival. Leukemia Research 39: 874–882. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.04.012.

Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A and van Duijn CM (2007) GenABEL: an R library for genome‐wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23: 1294–1296. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108.

Behrens G, Winkler TW, Gorski M, Leitzmann MF and Heid IM (2011) To stratify or not to stratify: power considerations for population‐based genome‐wide association studies of quantitative traits. Genetic Epidemiology 35: 867–879. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20637.

Bonduriansky R and Chenoweth SF (2009) Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 280–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.005.

Chang D, Gao F, Slavney A, et al. (2014) Accounting for eXentricities: analysis of the X chromosome in GWAS reveals X‐linked genes implicated in autoimmune diseases. PLoS One 9: e113684. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113684.

Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, et al. (2015) Second‐generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Giga Science 4: 7. DOI: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8.

Desachy G, Croen LA, Torres AR, et al. (2015) Increased female autosomal burden of rare copy number variants in human populations and in autism families. Molecular Psychiatry 20: 170–175. DOI: 10.1038/mp.2014.179.

Dimas AS, Nica AC, Montgomery SB, et al. (2012) Sex‐biased genetic effects on gene regulation in humans. Genome Research 22: 2368–2375. DOI: 10.1101/gr.134981.111.

Gao F, Chang D, Biddanda A, et al. (2015) XWAS: a software toolset for genetic data analysis and association studies of the X chromosome. Journal of Heredity 106: 666–671. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esv059.

Gauderman WJ, Zhang P, Morrison JL and Lewinger JP (2013) Finding novel genes by testing G × E interactions in a genome‐wide association study. Genetic Epidemiology 37: 603–613. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21748.

Gilks WP, Abbott JK and Morrow EH (2014) Sex differences in disease genetics: evidence, evolution, and detection. Trends in Genetics. TIG 30: 453–463. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.08.006.

Hoffman GE, Mezey JG and Schadt EE (2014) lrgpr: interactive linear mixed model analysis of genome‐wide association studies with composite hypothesis testing and regression diagnostics in R. Bioinformatics 30: 3134–3135. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu435.

Kang HJ, Kawasawa YI, Cheng F, et al. (2011) Spatio‐temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature 478: 483–489. DOI: 10.1038/nature10523.

Lessard CJ, Adrianto I, Ice JA, et al. (2012) Identification of IRF8, TMEM39A, and IKZF3‐ZPBP2 as susceptibility loci for systemic lupus erythematosus in a large‐scale multiracial replication study. American Journal of Human Genetics 90: 648–660. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.023.

Lin Y‐N, Roy A, Yan W, Burns KH and Matzuk MM (2007) Loss of zona pellucida binding proteins in the acrosomal matrix disrupts acrosome biogenesis and sperm morphogenesis. Molecular and Cellular Biology 27: 6794–6805. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01029-07.

Lin Z, Chen Q, Shi L, et al. (2012) Loss‐of‐function mutations in HOXC13 cause pure hair and nail ectodermal dysplasia. American Journal of Human Genetics 91: 906–911. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.029.

Liu LY, Schaub MA, Sirota M and Butte AJ (2012) Sex differences in disease risk from reported genome‐wide association study findings. Human Genetics 131: 353–364. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1081-y.

Lowe R, Gemma C, Rakyan VK and Holland ML (2015) Sexually dimorphic gene expression emerges with embryonic genome activation and is dynamic throughout development. BMC Genomics 16: 295. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1506-4.

Lu Y, Day FR, Gustafsson S, et al. (2016) New loci for body fat percentage reveal link between adiposity and cardiometabolic disease risk. Nature Communications 7: 10495. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10495.

Magi R, Lindgren CM and Morris AP (2010) Meta‐analysis of sex‐specific genome‐wide association studies. Genetic Epidemiology 34: 846–853. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20540.

Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, et al. (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461: 747–753. DOI: 10.1038/nature08494.

Manolio TA (2013) Bringing genome‐wide association findings into clinical use. Nature Reviews. Genetics 14: 549–558. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3523.

McIntyre RE, Nicod J, Robles‐Espinoza CD, et al. (2016) A Genome‐Wide Association Study for Regulators of Micronucleus Formation in Mice. G3 (Bethesda Md.) 6 (8): 2343–2354. DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.030767.

Morris AP, Voight BF, Teslovich TM, et al. (2012) Large‐scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nature Genetics 44: 981–990. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2383.

Naumova AK, Al Tuwaijri A, Morin A, et al. (2013) Sex‐ and age‐dependent DNA methylation at the 17q12‐q21 locus associated with childhood asthma. Human Genetics 132: 811–822. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-013-1298-z.

Ngun TC, Ghahramani N, Sánchez FJ, Bocklandt S and Vilain E (2011) The genetics of sex differences in brain and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 32: 227–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.10.001.

Ober C, Loisel DA and Gilad Y (2008) Sex‐specific genetic architecture of human disease. Nature Reviews. Genetics 9: 911–922. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2415.

Penaloza C, Estevez B, Orlanski S, et al. (2009) Sex of the cell dictates its response: differential gene expression and sensitivity to cell death inducing stress in male and female cells. FASEB Journal 23: 1869–1879. DOI: 10.1096/fj.08-119388.

Pischon T, Boeing H, Hoffmann K, et al. (2008) General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. New England Journal of Medicine 359: 2105–2120. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801891.

Qiu R, Zhang H, Zhao H, et al. (2013) Genetic variants on 17q21 are associated with ankylosing spondylitis susceptibility and severity in a Chinese Han population. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 42: 469–472. DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2013.786755.

Randall JC, Winkler TW, Kutalik Z, et al. (2013) Sex‐stratified genome‐wide association studies including 270,000 individuals show sexual dimorphism in genetic loci for anthropometric traits. PLoS Genetics 9: e1003500. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003500.

Rubtsova K, Marrack P and Rubtsov AV (2015) Sexual dimorphism in autoimmunity. Journal of Clinical Investigation 125: 2187–2193. DOI: 10.1172/JCI78082.

Shungin D, Winkler TW, Croteau‐Chonka DC, et al. (2015) New genetic loci link adipose and insulin biology to body fat distribution. Nature 518: 187–196. DOI: 10.1038/nature14132.

Tontonoz P, Graves RA, Budavari AI, et al. (1994) Adipocyte‐specific transcription factor ARF6 is a heterodimeric complex of two nuclear hormone receptors, PPAR gamma and RXR alpha. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 5628–5634.

Werling DM, Parikshak NN and Geschwind DH (2016) Gene expression in human brain implicates sexually dimorphic pathways in autism spectrum disorders. Nature Communications 7: 10717. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10717.

WHO (2016) WHO | Estimates for 2000–2012 (WWW Document). WHO. URL http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/ (accessed 14 June 2016).

Winkler TW, Justice AE, Graff M, et al. (2015) The influence of age and sex on genetic associations with adult body size and shape: a large‐scale genome‐wide interaction study. PLoS Genetics 11: e1005378. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005378.

Further Reading

Brown EA, Ruvolo M and Sabeti PC (2013) Many ways to die, one way to arrive: how selection acts through pregnancy. Trends in Genetics 29 (10): 585–592. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.03.001.

Cahill L (2012) A half‐truth is a whole lie: on the necessity of investigating sex influences on the brain. Endocrinology 153 (6): 2541–2543. DOI: 10.1210/en.2011-2167.

Kukurba KR, Parsana P, Balliu B, et al (2016) Impact of the X chromosome and sex on regulatory variation. Genome Research 26 (6): 768–777. DOI: 10.1101/gr.197897.115.

Mank JE, Hosken DJ and Wedell N (2014) Conflict on the sex chromosomes: cause, effect, and complexity. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 6 (12): a017715. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017715.

Rigby N and Kulathinal RJ (2015) Genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism in humans. Journal of Cellular Physiology 230 (10): 2304–2310. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.24979.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Gilks, William P(Nov 2016) Sex Differences in Disease Genetics. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0026936]