Genetic Nondiscrimination Legislation in the United States and Elsewhere – A Growing Body of Law and Its Impact on Employment


This analysis compares three regulatory models addressing genetic discrimination in employment. As such it has three main aims. First, it aims to determine whether the fear of litigation expressed by employers is warranted in light of the current legal regulation of genetic testing in the field of employment in the US, UK and EU law. As such, it analyses the three main regulatory approaches to the use of genetic data in the workplace. Second, drawing on international law and domestic legal systems, it aims to analyse the existing provisions and remaining points of uncertainty. Finally, it proposes the directions for future research necessary for the comprehensive understanding of the use of genetic data by employers.

Keywords: genetic discrimination; employment; Genetic Information Antidiscrimination Act (GINA 2008); UK law; EU law


Allain DC, Friedman S and Senter L (2012) Consumer awareness and attitudes about insurance discrimination post enactment of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. Familial Cancer 11 (4): 637–644.

Astellas Innovation Debate (2015)‐screening‐for‐workers‐a‐panacea‐or‐a‐pandoras‐box

Brownsword R (2008) Knowing me, knowing you – profiling, privacy and the public interest. In: Hildebrandt M & Gutwirth S (eds) Profiling the European Citizen, pp 345–363. New York: Springer.

C‐617/10 Åkerberg Fransson of 26 February 2013.

Case C‐236/09 (2011) Association Belgedes Consommateurs Test‐Achats ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres, 1/03/2011, available at‐236/09.

Case C-337/11 (2013) HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Werege v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Pro Display A/S 11 April 2013.

Condit CM (2010) Public attitudes and beliefs about genetics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 11: 339–359.

Data Protection Act 1998 (c. 29).

Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, OJ 2000 L 303/16.

EEOC v. Founders Pavilion, Inc., 13‐CV‐01438.

Geelen E, Horstman K, Marcelis CL, Doevendans PA and Van Hoyweghen I (2012) Unravelling fears of genetic discrimination: an exploratory study of Dutch HCM families in an era of genetic non‐discrimination acts. European Journal of Human Genetics 20 (19): 1018–1023.

Gilbert N (2015) Why the ‘devious defecator’ case is a landmark for US genetic‐privacy law. Nature.‐the‐devious‐defecator‐case‐is‐a‐landmark‐for‐us‐genetic‐privacy‐law‐1.17857.

Henneman L and Van Hoyweghen I (2014) Moving beyond public fear of genetic discrimination. Asia Insurance Review 1: 64–65.

Hervey T and Rostant P (2016) Is non‐ideal‐weight discrimination unlawful in the UK? Modern Law Review 79 (2): 248–282.

Hoy M (2014) Genetic Discrimination, eLS. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.‐a0005186.html.

Human Genetics Commission (2011) The Concept of Genetic Discrimination. London, UK: Human Genetics Commission.‐pdf‐downloads/cathys‐pdf.pdf.

Human Rights Act 1998 (c. 42).

Human Tissue Act 2004 (c.30).

International Labour Office (2007) Director‐General and International Labour Conference. Equality At Work: Tackling the Challenges : Global Report Under the Follow Up to the ILO Declaration On Fundamental Principles and Rights At Work, p. 49. Geneva: International Labour Office.

Krajewska A (2009) Conceptual quandaries about genetic data – a comparative perspective. European Journal of Health Law 16 (1): 7–26.

Krajewska A (2011) The right to personality in (post‐)genomic medicine – a new way of thinking for the new frontier. European Human Rights Law Review 16 (1): 54–70.

Laurie G (2010) Managing access to biobanks: how can we reconcile privacy and public interests in genetic research? Medical Law International, 10: 315–337.

Lemke T (2013) Perspectives on Genetic Discrimination, pp. 23–41. New York, NY: Routledge.

Lowe and Reynolds v. Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services (Atlanta), LLC, Civil Action No.1:13‐cv‐2425‐at.

McDevitt WJ (2009) I dream of GINA: understanding the employment provisions of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. Villanova Law Review 54, Rev. 91.

McGleenan T (2006) Genetic Information, Genetic Testing, and Employment, eLS. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.‐a0005209.html.

P3G Consortium, Church G and Heeney Cet al. (2009) Public access to genome‐wide data: five views on balancing research with privacy and protection. PLoS Genetics 5: e1000665.

Sanderson SC (2008) Predictive Genetic Testing: Emotional and Behavioural Impact, eLS. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.‐a0005626.html.

Silverman RE (2015) Genetic Testing May Be Coming to Your Office. The Wall Street Journal, December 15, 2015.‐testing‐may‐be‐coming‐to‐your‐office‐1450227295

Smith JC and Medalia C (2015) Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2014, US Census Bureau, September 2015.‐253.pdf

Taylor M (2012) Genetic Data and the Law, A Critical Perspective on Privacy Protection. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

The Economist (2010) A Special Report on the Human Genome: Biology 2.0, 17 June 2010, available via:

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, Pub.L. 110–233, 122 Stat. 881.

UNESCO (1997) Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Human Genome, 11 November 1997.‐URL_ID=13177&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

UNESCO (2003) International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, 16 October 2003 r., Records of the General Conference of the 32nd Session, Paris 23 September–17 October 2003.‐URL_ID=17720&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2013) Press Release: Fabricut to Pay $50,000 to Settle EEOC Disability and Genetic Information Discrimination Lawsuit, 7 May 2013.‐7‐13b.cfm

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2014) Press Release: Founders Pavilion Will Pay $370,000 to Settle EEOC Genetic Information Discrimination Lawsuit, 13 January 2014.‐13‐14.cfm

Wauters A and Van Hoyweghen I (2016) Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review. Journal of Human Genetics 61: 275–282.

Further Reading

Albertson LJ (ed.) (2008) Genetic Discrimination. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

Arribas‐Ayllon M, Sarangi S and Clarke A (2013) Genetic Testing: Accounts of Autonomy, Responsibility and Blame. London, UK: Routledge.

Hepple B (2014) Equality: The Legal Framework. London, UK: Bloomsbury.

Lemke T (2013) Perspectives on Genetic Discrimination. New York, NY: Routledge.

Millington P, Holland J and Burnett S (2015) Employment Law. Oxford, UK: OUP.

Otlowski M, Taylor S and Bombar Y (2012) Genetic discrimination: international perspectives. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 13: 433–454.

Quinn G, de Paor A and Blanck P (eds) (2014) Genetic Discrimination: Transatlantic Perspectives on the Case for a European Level Legal Response. London, UK: Routledge.

United States Congress House of Representatives (2010) The Potential for Discrimination in Health Insurance Based on Predictive Genetic Tests. Blackwell's USA.

Waddington L, Quinn G and Flynn E (eds) (2009–2014) The European Yearbook of Disability Law, volumes 1–4.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Krajewska, Atina(Jan 2017) Genetic Nondiscrimination Legislation in the United States and Elsewhere – A Growing Body of Law and Its Impact on Employment. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0027006]