History of Biosemiotics

Abstract

Emerging from the need for an interdisciplinary approach that may facilitate the explanation of complex phenomena about information and interpretation (i.e. phenomena of semiosis), biosemiotics – or the study of signs and meaning in living organisms – includes to this day different theoretical stances revolving around some shared principles and key theories. Therefore, tracing its historical development requires to factor in the complexity of the events and concepts that have paved the way to the more unified and homogenous field of study that biosemiotics is today. While bearing in mind that the two precursors of the discipline – Charles Sanders Peirce and Jakob von Uexküll – come from the fields of semiotics and biology respectively, the main great credit for developing biosemiotics should be given to Thomas Albert Sebeok. In the history of biosemiotics, after an initial pioneering phase of parallel but stand‐alone studies (1961–1977), the second phase (since 1977) brought to a unification under common principles. Seminal for the formulation and establishment of the fundamental principles were the yearly conferences devoted exclusively to biosemiotics – called Gatherings in Biosemiotics – and the publications of scholarly research in several prestigious journals.

Key Concepts

  • Biosemiotics deals with the study of signs and meaning in living organisms.
  • The synthesis of the triadic semiotics of Charles Sanders Peirce and the Umwelt Theory of Jacob von Uexküll lies at the root of biosemiotics.
  • Even though Friedrich S. Rothschild coined the term ‘biosemiotics’, yet the actual founder of the field of studies was Thomas Albert Sebeok.
  • The biosemiotician Marcello Barbieri divides the history of biosemiotics into two periods: the first, from 1961 to 1977, characterized by isolated attempts to create a synthesis between semiotics and biology; the second, from 1977 to 2011, characterized by the will to find a unified field of studies under common principles.
  • The basic principles, which unite all the biosemioticians, are that life and semiosis are coextensive (Sebeok's Thesis) and that signs, codes and symbols are natural entities, not the product of a supernatural agency.

Keywords: biosemiotics; semiotics; semiosis; meaning; information; zoosemiotics; Funktionskreis; Thomas Albert Sebeok; Jakob von Uexküll; Charles Sanders Peirce

Figure 1. The American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914). https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Charles‐Sanders‐Peirce.jpg. Public Domain.
Figure 2. The biologist Jakob von Uexküll (1864–1944). https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uex_photo_full.jpg. Public Domain.
Figure 3. The functional cycle. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uexk%C3%BCll_wirkkreis.jpg. Public Domain.
close

References

Barbieri M (1985) La Teoria Semantica Dell'evoluzione. Torino: Boringhieri.

Barbieri M (2001) The Organic Codes: The Birth of Semantic Biology. Ancona: Pequod.

Barbieri M (2007) Has biosemiotics come of age? And postscript. In: Barbieri M (ed.) Introduction to Biosemiotics: The New Biological Synthesis, chap. 4, pp 101–113. Dordrecht: Springer.

Barbieri M (2008) The code model of semiosis. American Journal of Semiotics 24 (1): 23–37.

Barbieri M (2009) A short history of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics 2: 221–245.

Bateson G (1979) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: Dutton.

Brentari C (2015) Jakob von Uexküll: The Discovery of the Umwelt between Biosemiotics and Theoretical Biology. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.

Cassirer E (1950) The Problem of Knowledge: Philosophy, Science, and History since Hegel. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Deacon TW (1997) The Symbolic Species: The Co‐evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: Norton & Company.

Emmeche C (2000) Transdisciplinarity, theory‐zapping and the growth of knowledge. Semiotica 131 (3): 217–228.

Favareau D (2005) Founding a world biosemiotics institution: the International Society for Biosemiotic Studies. Sign Systems Studies 33 (2): 481–485.

Heidegger M (1983) Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik. Welt, Endlichkeit, Einsamkeit, Freiburger Vorlesungen 1929/1930. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

Hoffmeyer J and Emmeche C (1991) Code‐duality and the semiotics of nature. In: Anderson M and Merrell F (eds) On Semiotic Modeling, pp 117–166. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hoffmeyer J (1996) Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Hoffmeyer J (2008a) Bateson the precursor. In: Hoffmeyer J (ed.) A Legacy for Living Systems: Gregory Bateson as Precursor to Biosemiotics, pp 1–14. Dordrecht: Springer.

Hoffmeyer J (2008b) Postscript: short historical notes. In: Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs, pp 355–368. Scranton/London: University of Scranton Press.

Kull K (1999a) Biosemiotics in twentieth century: a view from biology. Semiotica 127 (1): 385–414.

Kull K (1999b) Towards biosemiotics with Yuri Lotman. Semiotica 127: 115–131.

Kull K (1999c) On the history of joining bio with semio: F. S. Rothschild and the biosemiotic rules. Sign Systems Studies 27: 128–138.

Kull K, Emmche C and Favareau D (2008) Biosemiotic questions. Biosemiotics 1 (1): 41–55.

Kull K, Deacon T, Emmeche C, et al. (2009) Theses on biosemiotics: prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory 4 (2): 167–173.

Lotman YM, Uspensky BA and Mihaychuk G (1978) On the semiotic mechanism of culture. New Literary History 9 (2): 211–232.

Lotman YM (1984) O semiosfere. Sign Systems Studies 17: 5–23.

Markoš A (2002) Readers of the Book of Life: Contextualizing Developmental Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Markoš A (ed.) (2010) Jazyková Metafora Živého. Praha: Petr Mervart.

Pattee HH (2001) The physics of symbols: bridging the epistemic cut. Biosystems 60: 5–21.

Posner R, Robering K and Sebeok TA (1997–2004) Semiotik/Semiotics: A Handbook on the Sign‐theoretical Foundations of Nature and Culture, vol. 1–4. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.

Prodi G (1977) Le Basi Materiali della Significazione. Milano: Bompiani.

Rattasepp S and Bennett T (2012) Gatherings in Biosemiotics. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.

Rothschild FS (1962) Laws of symbolic mediation in the dynamics of self and personality. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 96: 774–784.

Sebeok TA (1963) Communication in animals and men. Language 39: 448–466.

Sebeok TA (1988) Communication, language and speech: evolutionary considerations. In: Herzfeld M and Melazzo L (eds) Semiotic Theory and Practice: Proceedings of the Third International Congress of the IASS Palermo, vol. II, pp 1083–1091. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sebeok TA (1990) Essays in Zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.

Sebeok TA and Umiker‐Sebeok J (eds) (1992) Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web 1991. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Sebeok TA (2001) Biosemiotics: its roots, proliferation, and prospects. Semiotica 134 (1): 61–78.

Stepanov JS (1971) Semiotika. Moscow: Nauka.

von Uexküll J (1921) Umwelt und Innerwelt der Tiere. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

von Uexküll J (1928) Theoretische Biologie. Berlin: Springer.

von Uexküll J (1982) The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42 (1): 1–87.

von Uexküll J (1992) A stroll through the worlds of animal and men. Semiotica 89 (4): 273–391.

Waddington C (1968) Towards a Theoretical Biology. Nature 218: 525–527.

Further Reading

Cobley P (2016) Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.

Deely J, Petrilli S and Ponzio A (2005) The Semiotic Animal. New York: Legas.

Favareau D (2010) Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary. Dordrecht/New York: Springer.

Kull K (2003) Thomas A. Sebeok and biology: building biosemiotics. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 10 (1): 47–60.

Pattee HH and Kull K (2009) A biosemiotic conversation: between physics and semiotics. Sign Systems Studies 37 (1): 311–331.

Sebeok TA and Danesi M (2000) The Forms of Meaning: Modeling System Theory and Semiotic Analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Velmezova E, Kull K and Cowley SJ (eds) (2015) Biosemiotic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics. Cham: Springer.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Robuschi, Camilla(Jun 2020) History of Biosemiotics. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0027987]