The basis of palaeoecological research is to use the fossil remains preserved in sedimentary deposits to investigate the origin, history and long‐term dynamics of taxa, populations, communities and ecosystems. Palaeoecological data and methods can be also be used for reconstructing past climates and other environmental factors. Palaeoecological records can extend from years to millions of years and can therefore be used for testing the hypotheses of neo‐ecology and biogeography under environmental conditions different and more extreme than present in the modern Earth. Palaeoecology provides often the only means to investigate species macro‐ and microevolutionary patterns or rates of speciation and extinction, and slow ecological processes, such as the rise and fall of ecosystems and biomes, species adaptation or migration, and population growth or decline rates. Palaeoecological records provide also unique insights for identifying the ancestry and naturalness of modern ecosystems, and are increasingly recognised as important sources of baseline information in ecosystem management.

Key Concepts

  • Palaeoecological research is based on studying various types of fossils preserved in sedimentary deposits.
  • Palaeoecological records can reach as far back as ecosystems have existed.
  • Palaeoecology is a synthetic field of science, integrating concepts and techniques of biology and geology.
  • Niche conservatism is one of the key issues in palaeoecology and the underlying principle in the use of fossil data in environmental reconstructions.
  • Palaeoecological records provide opportunities to investigate whether the ecological hypotheses about the species and ecosystems response patterns have been valid during the extreme changes and disturbances in the geological history.
  • In environmental reconstructions, the fossil assemblages are used to provide quantitative data about the past climatic or other environmental conditions.
  • Natural background conditions in biodiversity conservation, ecosystem management and restoration plans can be determined using palaeoecological data.

Keywords: sediments; fossils; time; ecosystems; evolution

Figure 1. A six‐step conceptual model that describes the series of processes that influence the inference of fossil data in palaeoecology. Each oval represents the processes in which information is transferred and transformed. In each processes, information is distorted or lost and the fossil records are thus normally incomplete and biased sources for studying past ecosystems. Target represents the study object, such as past vegetation assemblage; source the fossil data, such as animal megafossils or pollen; vector refers to processes by which material from the source are transported to a deposition site; diagenesis means the changes and alterations that take place on fossil material after deposition; analysis includes the actions, decisions and interpretations made by the scientists using the fossil data to investigate the target. Reproduced from Jackson © Elsevier.
Figure 2. A flowchart depicting the role of biotic and geological (abiotic) components in palaeoecological research. Birks and Birks, © H.J.B. Birks and Hilary H. Birks.
Figure 3. The dynamics of Sahara, a subtropical desert biome during the last 10 000 years. The aeolian dust record reflects the mid‐Holocene replacement of savanna vegetation by the modern desert vegetation. This coincides with the vegetation and precipitation decline simulated by an earth system model of intermediate complexity and is ultimately caused by decreasing summer solar radiation and weaker summer monsoon in the region. Oldfield, . Reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press.


Barnosky AD, Matzke N, Tomiya S, et al. (2011) Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471: 51–57.

Beerling D (2007) The Emerald Planet. How Plants Change Earth's History, p. 288. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Bennett KD (1997) Evolution and Ecology. The Pace of Life, p. 241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Benton MJ and Twitchett RJ (2003) How to kill (almost) all life: the end‐Permian extinction event. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 358–365.

Birks HJB and Birks HH (1980) Quaternary palaeoecology, p. 289. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Birks HJB (2014) Quantitative palaeoenvironmental reconstructions from Holocene biological data. In: Mackay A, Battarbee R, Birks HJB and Oldfield F (eds) Global Change in the Holocene, pp. 107–123. London: Arnold.

Cooper A, Turney C, Hughen KA, et al. (2015) Abrupt warming events drove Late Pleistocene Holarctic megafaunal turnover. Science 349: 602–606.

Dietl GP, Kidwell SM, Brenner M, et al. (2015) Conservation paleobiology: leveraging knowledge of the past to inform conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 43: 79–103.

Flessa KW and Jackson ST (2005) Forging a common agenda for ecology and paleoecology. Bioscience 55: 1030–1031.

Foley JA, Coe MT, Scheffer M and Wang G (2003) Regime shifts in the Sahara and Sahel: interactions between ecological and climatic systems in Northern Africa. Ecosystems 6: 524–532.

Froyd CA and Willis KJ (2008) Emerging issues in biodiversity & conservation management: the need for a palaeoecological perspective. Quaternary Science Reviews 27: 1723–1732.

Gaillard M, Sugita S, Mazier F, et al. (2010) Holocene land‐cover reconstructions for studies on land cover‐climate feedbacks. Climate of the Past 6: 483–499.

Heiri O, Brooks SJ, Renssen H, et al. (2014) Validation of climate model‐inferred regional temperature change for late‐glacial Europe. Nature Communications 5: 4914. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5914.

Hubbell SP (2001) A Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jackson ST (2012) Representation of flora and vegetation in Quaternary fossil assemblages: known and unknown knowns and unknowns. Quaternary Science Reviews 49: 1–15.

Jackson ST and Blois JL (2015) Community ecology in a changing environment: perspectives from the Quaternary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112: 4915–4921.

Metwally AA, Scott K, Neumann FH, et al. (2007) Holocene palynology and palaeoenvironments in the Savanna Biome at Tswaing Crater, central South Africa. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 402: 125–135.

Mosbrugger V, Utescher T and Dilcher DL (2005) Cenozoic continental climatic evolution of Central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 14964–14969.

Oldfield F (2005) Environmental Change. Key Issues and Alternative Perspectives, p. 363. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Seppä H, Alenius T, Bradshaw RHW, et al. (2009) Invasion of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and the rise of the boreal ecosystem in Fennoscandia. Journal of Ecology 97: 629–640.

Smith FA, Betancourt JL and Brown JH (1995) Evolution of body size in the woodrat over the past 25 000 years of climate change. Science 270: 2012–2014.

Smol JP (2016) Arctic and Sub‐Arctic shallow lakes in a multiple‐stressor world: a paleoecological perspective. Hydrobiologia 778: 253–272.

Steegmann AT Jr, Cerny FJ and Holliday TW (2002) Neandertal cold adaptation: physiological and energetic factors. American Journal of Human Biology 14: 566–583.

Thorpe SKS, Holder RL and Crompton RH (2007) Origin of human bipedalism as an adaptation for locomotion on flexible branches. Science 316: 1328–1331.

Tzedakis PC, Emerson BC and Hewitt GM (2013) Cryptic or mystic? Glacial tree refugia in northern Europe. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28: 696–704.

Wiens JJ, Ackerly DD, Allen AP, et al. (2010) Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecology Letters 13: 1310–1324.

Willerslev E, Davison J, Moora M, et al. (2014) Fifty thousand years of Arctic vegetation and megafaunal diet. Nature 506: 47–51.

Further Reading

Birks HJB (1995) Quantitative palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. In: Maddy D and Brew JS (eds) Statistical modeling of Quaternary science data. Technical Guide, vol. 5, pp. 161–254. Cambridge, UK: Quaternary Research Association.

Cole LES, Bhagwat SA and Willis KJ (2014) Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance. Nature Communications 5: 3906. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4906.

Delcourt HR and Delcourt PA (1993) Quaternary Ecology, p. 242. London: Chapman & Hall.

Holt RD, Barfield M and Gomulkiewicz R (2005) Theories of niche conservatism and evolution. Could exotic species be potential tests? In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ and Gaines SD (eds) Species Invasions. Insights into Ecology, Evolution and Biogeography, pp. 260–290. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Jackson ST and Hobbs RJ (2009) Ecological restoration in the light of ecological history. Science 325: 567–569.

Juggins S and Birks HJB (2012) Quantitative environmental reconstructions from biological data. In: Birks HJB, Lotter AF, Juggins S and Smol JP (eds) Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments. Data Handling and Numerical Techniques, vol. 5, pp. 431–494. Dordrecht: Springer.

Williams JW and Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 5: 475–482.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Seppä, Heikki(Apr 2018) Palaeoecology. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0003232.pub2]