Polar Auxin Transport


Auxins, a group of plant signalling compounds, ensure proper growth and development of the plant in relation to both external and internal stimuli. Within a plant, auxin is distributed asymmetrically, thus creating local auxin maxima and minima. Such asymmetric auxin distribution underlies many developmental and stress adaptation processes and facilitates their spatial and temporal coordination. The appropriate local auxin level is achieved by regulation of biosynthesis, metabolism and through active, cell‐to‐cell transport relying on auxin carriers that are embedded in the plasma membrane. Owing to the physical–chemical properties of the auxin molecule, the asymmetric (polar) localisation of auxin efflux carriers, analogous in neighbouring cells, determines the direction of intercellular auxin flow (polar auxin transport). With respect to the important function of polar auxin transport for plant development, the polar auxin transport machinery is subject to a tight control at multiple regulatory levels.

Key Concepts

  • Auxin flow through polar auxin transport pathways relies on concerted action of passive diffusion and auxin transporters.
  • Complex machinery consisting of both auxin carriers and regulatory networks modulates polar auxin transport.
  • Polar auxin transport machinery, together with auxin biosynthesis and its further metabolism, contributes to establishment and control of auxin homeostasis and therefore to the availability of auxin for signalling pathways.
  • Detailed quantitative data are needed for further understanding of polar auxin transport regulation.
  • Mathematical modelling based on detailed quantitative data represents a promising tool to understand contribution of individual processes to resulting polar auxin flow.

Keywords: plant hormones; auxin maxima and minima; auxin transporters; PIN proteins; ABCB proteins; AUX1/LAX proteins; Arabidopsis thaliana

Figure 1. Auxin and its transport. (a) Chemical structure of the most abundant native auxin indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA). (b) Auxin flow through plant. Postembryonic plant growth and development is regulated by auxin distribution (symbolised by arrows) to create auxin minima and maxima. In the shoot, reverse, and in the root, inverse fountain‐like auxin flow (Benková et al., ) maintains proper plant growth and allows adaptation to environmental changes. Main processes regulated by auxin are emphasised. Adapted from Prusinkiewicz and Runions © John Wiley and Sons Ltd. (c) Cell‐to‐cell auxin transport. The short‐distance, cell‐to‐cell auxin transport is achieved by the defined, often polar, localisation of individual transporters and underlies the formation of auxin minima and maxima, which are important for proper plant growth and adaptation to environmental stimuli. IAA (auxin) can enter the cell either in a protonated form (IAAH) via passive transport or as an anion through the influx carriers from the family AUX1/LAX and some members of the ABCB family. Inside the cell, IAAH dissociates because of the higher pH within the cytoplasm. IAA anion (IAA) cannot pass the membrane by passive diffusion; therefore, it must be exported by active transport through plasma membrane‐localised efflux carriers belonging to either PIN of ABCB families. Thus, the auxin efflux carriers represent bottlenecks in auxin movement through cells and it is their polar localisation (if analogous in neighbouring cells) that determines the direction of the auxin flow.
Figure 2. Auxin transporters and auxin flow during embryogenesis and root gravitropic response. Auxin regulates many aspects of plant development and adaptation to environmental stimuli. In this figure, we describe the involvement of polar auxin transport at early steps of plant development (embryogenesis) and during the response of the root to gravitropic stimulus. Adapted from Petrášek and Friml . (a) Auxin distribution during embryogenesis. Arrows indicate auxin flow mediated by a particular transporter; dotted lines indicate the cell‐type‐specific localisation of particular auxin transporters with no obvious polarity. PIN7, localised at the apical sides of the suspensor cells (s), transports auxin towards the apical cell (a) that forms the proembryo; therefore, PIN1, which is localised at all inner cell sides, distributes auxin homogenously. ABCB1 and ABCB19 cooperate during this initial stage and are localised apolarly in all cells or only in the uppermost suspensor cell, respectively. The crucial moment in the setting of the basal end of the apical–basal embryonic axis occurs during the early globular stage, when PIN1 starts to be localised basally in the proembryonal cells, and PIN7 is simultaneously shifted from the apical to the basal plasma membrane of suspensor cells. These PIN polarity rearrangements reverse the auxin flow downwards and, with the aid of PIN4, lead to auxin accumulation in the forming hypophysis (h). At this stage, ABCB19 helps to maintain the auxin distribution in the outer layers of the embryo. In triangular‐ and heart‐stage embryos, bilateral symmetry is established through auxin maxima at the incipient cotyledon (c) primordia. These auxin maxima are generated by PIN1 activity in the epidermis; in the inner cells of cotyledon primordia, however, PIN1 mediates basipetal auxin transport towards the root pole. SAM, future shoot apical meristem. (b) Positive root gravitropism. In starch‐containing, gravity‐sensing columella cells, PIN3 is relocalised from a symmetric distribution (left) towards the newly established bottom side after gravistimulation (right). The auxin that is redirected to the lower side of the root tip is further transported to the elongation zone by epidermal PIN2/AUX1mediated flow, where it inhibits the cell growth and causes the downward bending of the root. ABCB4 and ABCB19 are considered to regulate gravitropic response, as their mutants show enhanced root gravitropic bending. Coloured arrows indicate auxin flow mediated by a particular transporter; dotted lines indicate the cell‐type‐specific localisation of particular auxin transporters with no obvious polarity and black arrows indicate the gravity vector (left) and the direction of bending (right). Adapted from Petrášek and Friml © Company of Biologists Ltd.
Figure 3. Mutant versions of crucial auxin transporters. Often, single mutants of auxin transporters do not show a dramatic phenotype, owing to the high redundancy within the protein families [described in Vieten et al., ]. The figure shows the most obvious phenotypes of selected auxin transporter mutants. (a) Phenotype of full‐grown wild type plant. (b) The auxin efflux carrier PIN‐FORMED 1 (PIN1) is expressed almost everywhere in the plant, but pin1 mutants are characterised typically by an inflorescence meristem that does not initiate any flowers, resulting in the formation of a naked inflorescence stem (Gälweiler et al., ). (c) The abcb19 (ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA ATPBINDING CASSETTE B19) mutant shows phenotype consisting of several features connected to auxin action but the most obvious one is reduced stem height (partial dwarfism; Noh et al., ). (d) Phenotype of wild‐type Arabidopsis seedling. (e) Loss of function of an auxin influx transporter, aux1 (AUXIN RESISTANT 1 (AUX1); Bennett et al., ), as well as of the efflux transporter pin2 (f) (EIR1/PIN‐FORMED 2 (PIN2)/AGR1; Luschnig et al., ; Müller et al., ), results in agravitropic roots, as auxin is not only regulating proper plant growth but also adaptation to environmental changes, such as gravity stimulus. (g) Proper auxin distribution is crucial for organ development; therefore, the triple mutant of the auxin influx carrier aux1 lax1/2 results in misshaped seedlings (Robert et al., ). (h) Loss of the closely related AGCVIII protein kinases pid wag1 wag2, which orchestrate the proper localisation of distinct auxin carriers, results in arrested development (Dhonukshe et al., ).
Figure 4. Predicted auxin transporters topology. (a) Auxin transporters of the AUX1/LAX family represented by the auxin influx carrier AtAUX1, auxin transporters of the PIN family represented by the auxin efflux carrier AtPIN1 with long cytosolic loop, (b) the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)‐localised auxin carrier AtPIN5 with short cytosolic loop (b) and (c) auxin transporters of the ABCB family represented by the auxin efflux carrier AtABCB19. Adapted from Petrášek et al. © Springer. (d) AtNRT1.1 primarily functions as a dual‐affinity transporter, which can change its affinity for nitrate in response to substrate availability. The figure shows a cylinder representation of the AtNRT1.1 dimer with highlighted Thr101. The two monomers are coloured in pale green and light blue, according to Sun and Zheng .
Figure 5. Cellular processes involved in auxin transport regulation. This figure shows a schematic overview of cellular distribution of main auxin carriers and processes that are involved in control of their abundance, localisation and activity. Cellular uptake of auxin is mediated by proteins from the auxin influx carrier family AUX1/LAX and by selected ABCB transporters. Cellular auxin efflux requires the action of certain ABCB transporters, and PINs (PIN1, 2, 3, 4, 7) at the plasma membrane (PM). Localisation of PINs (PIN5, 6, 8) at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, together with some proteins from the PILS family, leads to compartmentalisation of auxin between cytoplasm and lumen of the ER, thus modifying overall auxin metabolic conversion. Auxin homeostasis is sensed by nuclear TIR1/AFB‐Aux/IAA coreceptor complexes. Intracellular trafficking of the auxin transporters regulates their abundance at the PM, comprising both recycling back to the PM (GNOM‐dependent, over early endosomes, EE) and the targeting to the lytic vacuole for degradation (over sorting endosomes (SE) and the trans‐Golgi network (TGN)). Although all auxin transporters undergo intracellular trafficking, PIN2 was most studied so far. Endocytic sorting and further targeting of PIN proteins into the lytic vacuole depends on putative retromer subunit SNX1, which functions as a gating factor, promoting protein recycling to the PM and thereby antagonising vacuolar sorting. CLASP‐mediated tethering of SNX1 to microtubules links PIN sorting to cytoskeleton components. Posttranslational modifications regulate the abundance, polarity and activity of auxin transporters: ubiquitylation targets PINs towards the lytic vacuole, phosphorylation regulates either their polarity (by PID/WAG) towards apical PM or their activity (by D6PK). U, ubiquitin; P, phosphate and MT, microtubules. Adapted from Retzer et al. © Springer.


Armengot L, Caldarella E, Marquès‐Bueno MM and Martínez MC (2016) The protein kinase CK2 mediates cross‐talk between auxin‐ and salicylic acid‐signaling pathways in the regulation of PINOID transcription. PLoS ONE 11: 1–15.

Ballesteros I, Domínguez T, Sauer M, et al. (2013) Specialized functions of the PP2A subfamily II catalytic subunits PP2A‐C3 and PP2AC4 in the distribution of auxin fluxes and development in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 73: 862–872.

Barbez E and Kleine‐Vehn J (2013) Divide Et Impera‐cellular auxin compartmentalization. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 16: 78–84.

Barbosa ICR, Zourelidou M, Willige BC, Weller B and Schwechheimer C (2014) D6 PROTEIN KINASE activates auxin transport‐dependent growth and PIN‐FORMED phosphorylation at the plasma membrane. Developmental Cell 29: 674–685.

Benková E, Michniewicz M, Sauer M, et al. (2003) Local, efflux‐dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell 115: 591–602.

Bennett MJ, Marchant A, Green HG, et al. (1996) Arabidopsis AUX1 gene: a permease‐like regulator of root gravitropism. Science (New York, N.Y.), 273: 948–950.

Bennett T and Leyser O (2014) In: Zažímalová E, Petrášek J and Benková E (eds) Auxin and Its Role in Plant Development. Vienna: Springer Vienna.

Chen Q, Liu Y, Maere S, et al. (2015) A coherent transcriptional feed‐forward motif model for mediating auxin‐sensitive PIN3 expression during lateral root development. Nature Communications 6: 8821.

Cho M and Cho H‐T (2013) The function of ABCB transporters in auxin transport. Plant Signaling & Behavior 8: e22990.

Christie JM, Yang H, Richter GL, et al. (2011) Phot1 inhibition of ABCB19 primes lateral auxin fluxes in the shoot apex required for phototropism. PLoS Biology 9: e1001076.

De Smet I and Beeckman T (2011) Asymmetric cell division in land plants and algae: the driving force for differentiation. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 12: 177–188.

Dhonukshe P, Huang F, Galvan‐Ampudia CS, et al. (2010) Plasma membrane‐bound AGC3 kinases phosphorylate PIN auxin carriers at TPRXS(N/S) motifs to direct apical PIN recycling. Development 137: 3245–3255.

Drdová EJ, Synek L, Pečenková T, et al. (2013) The exocyst complex contributes to PIN auxin efflux carrier recycling and polar auxin transport in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 73: 709–719.

Enders TA and Strader LC (2015) Auxin activity: past, present, and future. American Journal of Botany 102: 180–196.

Friml J, Yang X, Michniewicz M, et al. (2004) A PINOID‐dependent binary switch in apical‐basal PIN polar targeting directs auxin efflux. Science 306: 862–865.

Galweiler L, Guan C, Muller A, et al. (1998) Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science 282: 2226–2230.

Gao Y and Zhao Y (2014) Auxin and Its Role in Plant Development, vol. 33, pp. 21–33. Vienna: Springer.

Geisler M, Kolukisaoglu HU, Bouchard R, et al. (2003) TWISTED DWARF1, a unique plasma membrane‐anchored immunophilin‐like protein, interacts with Arabidopsis multidrug resistance‐like transporters AtPGP1 and AtPGP19. Molecular Biology of the Cell 14: 4238–4249.

Grones P and Friml J (2015) Auxin transporters and binding proteins at a glance. Journal of Cell Science 128: 1–7.

Habets MEJ and Offringa R (2014) PIN‐driven polar auxin transport in plant developmental plasticity: a key target for environmental and endogenous signals. New Phytologist 203: 362–377.

Henrichs S, Wang B, Fukao Y, et al. (2012) Regulation of ABCB1/PGP1‐catalysed auxin transport by linker phosphorylation. The EMBO Journal 31: 2965–2980.

Hoyerová K, Perry L, Hand P, et al. (2008) Functional characterization of PaLAX1, a putative auxin permease, in heterologous plant systems. Plant Physiology 146: 1128–1141.

Klíma P, Laňková M and Zažímalová E (2016) Inhibitors of plant hormone transport. Protoplasma 253: 1391–1404.

Křeček P, Skpa P, Libus J, et al. (2009) The PINFORMED (PIN) protein family of auxin transporters. Genome Biology 10: 249.

Krogan NT, Marcos D, Weiner AI and Berleth T (2016) The auxin response factor MONOPTEROS controls meristem function and organogenesis in both the shoot and root through the direct regulation of PIN genes. New Phytologist 212: 42–50.

Krouk G, Lacombe B, Bielach A, et al. (2010) Nitrate‐regulated auxin transport by NRT1.1 defines a mechanism for nutrient sensing in plants. Developmental Cell 18: 927–937.

Kubeš M, Yang H, Richter GL, et al. (2012) The Arabidopsis concentration‐dependent influx/efflux transporter ABCB4 regulates cellular auxin levels in the root epidermis. Plant Journal 69: 640–654.

Leitner J, Retzer K, Korbei B and Luschnig C (2012) Dynamics in PIN2 auxin carrier ubiquitylation in gravity‐responding Arabidopsis roots. Plant Signaling & Behavior 7: 1271–1273.

Luschnig C, Gaxiola RA, Grisafi P and Fink GR (1998) EIR1, a root‐specific protein involved in auxin transport, is required for gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes and Development 12: 2175–2187.

Luschnig C and Vert G (2014) The dynamics of plant plasma membrane proteins: PINs and beyond. Development 141: 2924–2938.

Mravec J, Skpa P, Bailly A, et al. (2009) Subcellular homeostasis of phytohormone auxin is mediated by the ER‐localized PIN5 transporter. Nature 459: 1136–1140.

Müller A, Guan C, Gälweiler L, et al. (1998) AtPIN2 defines a locus of Arabidopsis for root gravitropism control. The EMBO Journal 17: 6903–6911.

Nodzyński T, Vanneste S, Zwiewka M, et al. (2016) Enquiry into the topology of plasma membrane localized PIN auxin transport components. Molecular Plant 9: 1504–1519.

Noh B, Murphy AS and Spalding EP (2001) Multidrug resistance‐like genes of Arabidopsis required for auxin transport and auxin‐mediated development. The Plant Cell 13: 2441–2454.

Okada K, Ueda J, Komaki MK, Bell CJ and Shimura Y (1991) Requirement of the auxin polar transport system in early stages of Arabidopsis floral bud formation. The Plant Cell 3: 677–684.

Peer WA, Blakeslee JJ, Yang H and Murphy AS (2011) Seven things we think we know about auxin transport. Molecular Plant 4: 487–504.

Petrášek J, Malínská K and Zažímalová E (2011) Auxin transporters controlling plant development. In: Geisler M and Venema K (eds) Transporters and Pumps in Plant Signaling, pp. 255–290, Series “Signaling and Communication in Plants” 7,. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer‐Verlag.

Petrášek J and Friml J (2009) Auxin transport routes in plant development. Development 136: 2675–2688.

Porco S, Larrieu A, Du Y, et al. (2016) Lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis is dependent on transcription factor LBD29 regulating auxin influx carrier LAX3. Development 143: 3340–3349.

Prusinkiewicz P and Runions A (2012) Computational models of plant development and form. New Phytologist 193: 549–569.

Ranocha P, Dima O, Nagy R, et al. (2013) Arabidopsis WAT1 is a vacuolar auxin transport facilitator required for auxin homeostasis. Nature Communications 4: 2625.

Reemmer J and Murphy AS (2014) In: Zažímalová E, Petrášek J and Benková E (eds) Auxin and Its Role in Plant Development. Vienna: Springer Vienna.

Retzer K, Butt H, Korbei B and Luschnig C (2014) The far side of auxin signaling: fundamental cellular activities and their contribution to a defined growth response in plants. Protoplasma 251: 731–746.

Robert HS, Grunewald W, Sauer M, et al. (2015) Plant embryogenesis requires AUX/LAX‐mediated auxin influx. Development 142: 702–711.

Sato EM, Hijazi H, Bennett MJ, Vissenberg K and Swarup R (2015) New insights into root gravitropic signalling. Journal of Experimental Botany 66: 2155–2165.

Scheuring D and Kleine‐Vehn J (2014) In: Zažímalová E, Petrášek J and Benková E (eds) Auxin and Its Role in Plant Development. Vienna: Springer Vienna.

Shinohara N, Taylor C and Leyser O (2013) Strigolactone can promote or inhibit shoot branching by triggering rapid depletion of the auxin efflux protein PIN1 from the plasma membrane. PLoS Biology 11: e1001474.

Simon S and Petrášek J (2011) Why plants need more than one type of auxin. Plant Science 180: 454–460.

Simon S, Skpa P, Viaene T, et al. (2016) PIN6 auxin transporter at endoplasmic reticulum and plasma membrane mediates auxin homeostasis and organogenesis in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 211: 65–74.

Smit ME and Weijers D (2015) The role of auxin signaling in early embryo pattern formation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 28: 99–105.

Steenackers WJ, Klíma P, Quareshy M, et al. (2016) Cis‐cinnamic acid is a novel, natural auxin efflux inhibitor that promotes lateral root formation. Plant Physiology 173: 552–565.

Strader LC and Bartel B (2011) Transport and metabolism of the endogenous auxin precursor indole‐3‐butyric acid. Molecular Plant 4: 477–486.

Sun J, Zheng N (2015) Molecular Mechanism Underlying the Plant NRT1.1 Dual-Affinity Nitrate Transporter. Frontiers in Physiology 6: 386. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00386.

Swarup R and Péret B (2012) AUX/LAX family of auxin influx carriers‐an overview. Frontiers in Plant Science 3: 225.

Tan X, Cao K, Liu F, et al. (2016) Arabidopsis COG complex subunits COG3 and COG8 modulate golgi morphology, vesicle trafficking homeostasis and are essential for pollen tube growth. PLoS Genetics 12: 1–24.

Viaene T, Delwiche CF, Rensing SA and Friml J (2013) Origin and evolution of PIN auxin transporters in the green lineage. Trends in Plant Science 18: 5–10.

Viaene T, Landberg K, Thelander M, et al. (2014) Directional auxin transport mechanisms in early diverging land plants. Current Biology 24: 2786–2791.

Vieten A, Sauer M, Brewer PB and Friml J (2007) Molecular and cellular aspects of auxintransport‐mediated development. Trends in Plant Science 12: 160–168.

Vieten A, Vanneste S, Wisniewska J, et al. (2005) Functional redundancy of PIN proteins is accompanied by auxin‐dependent crossregulation of PIN expression. Development (Cambridge, England), 132: 4521–4531.

Wattelet‐Boyer V, Brocard L, Jonsson K, et al. (2016) Enrichment of hydroxylated C24‐ and C26‐acyl‐chain sphingolipids mediates PIN2 apical sorting at trans‐Golgi network subdomains. Nature Communications 7: 12788. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12788 doi:.

Willige BC, Ahlers S, Zourelidou M, et al. (2013) D6PK AGCVIII kinases are required for auxin transport and phototropic hypocotyl bending in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 25: 1674–1688.

Xi W, Gong X, Yang Q, Yu H and Liou Y‐C (2016) Pin1At regulates PIN1 polar localization and root gravitropism. Nature Communications 7: 10430.

Yang H, Richter GL, Wang X, et al. (2013) Sterols and sphingolipids differentially function in trafficking of the Arabidopsis ABCB19 auxin transporter. Plant Journal 74: 37–47.

Zažímalová E, Petrášek J and Benková E (eds) (2014) Auxin and Its Role in Plant Development. Vienna: Springer‐Verlag Wien.

Zazímalová E, Murphy AS, Yang H, Hoyerova K and Hosek P (2010) Auxin transporters — why so many? Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2: a001552.

Zourelidou M, Absmanner B, Weller B, et al. (2014) Auxin efflux by PIN‐FORMED proteins is activated by two different protein kinases, D6 PROTEIN KINASE and PINOID. eLife 3: e02860.

Further Reading

Bennett T, Hines G and Leyser O (2014) Canalization: what the flux? Trends in Genetics 30: 41–48.

Bishopp A and Bennett MJ (2014) Hormone crosstalk: directing the flow. Current Biology 24: R366R368.

Taiz L, Zeiger E, Moller IM and Murphy A (eds) (2015) Plant Physiology and Development. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Jozef, Lacek, Katarzyna, Retzer, Christian, Luschnig, and Eva, Zažímalová(Apr 2017) Polar Auxin Transport. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020116.pub2]