Electron Tomography


Electron tomography (ET) is an emerging electron microscopy (EM) technique for the three‐dimensional (3D) visualization of the cellular architecture and molecular organization in native cells at nanometer scale. ET thus bridges the gap between the low‐resolution imaging techniques and the high‐resolution structural techniques. In ET a series of images is taken from a single specimen at different projecting orientations. The 3D map computed from these images is subsequently subjected to visualization and interpretation. Thanks to several recent innovations in EM, including improved specimen preparation techniques, novel EM hardware and software, reliable genetic and molecular labelling approaches, ET is rapidly becoming a powerful bioimaging tool for precisely dissecting the macromolecular organizations and cellular events captured from living cells in health and disease. Thus many previously unanswered molecular mechanisms responsible for the specific cellular functions could be clearly elucidated by the ET technology.

Key concepts:

  • Electron tomography allows visualization of cellular architecture and molecular organization in native cells at nanometer scale in 3D.

  • Electron tomography bridges the resolution gap between the low resolution imaging techniques and the high‐resolution structural techniques.

  • The biological specimen has to be specially prepared before it is imaged in the electron microscope.

  • Data acquisition strategies have to be used to obtain reasonable image contrast and reduce the electron‐dose damage.

  • The 3D map is calculated from a series of 2D EM projection images recorded from the specimen at different projecting orientations.

  • Several post‐processing stages are intended to facilitate the interpretation of the complex 3D maps.

Keywords: electron tomography; cryo‐electron microscopy; cell biology; bioimaging

Figure 1.

Comparisons of 3D bioimaging tools.

Figure 2.

Projection acquisition and tomographic reconstruction. (a) Projection. (Left) Tilt series are acquired by tilting the specimen around a tilt axis (here perpendicular to the sheet) at small increments over a limited tilt range. (Centre) Projection process of an object made up of four dots with different radii at 0o tilt. (Right) Acquisition of several projections of a tilt series from the object. (b) Assembling the (FT) of the three projections at −45°, 0° and 45° ((a), right) in the Fourier space, which is progressively filled as more projections are acquired and their FTs assembled. Afterwards, an inverse FT yields the reconstructed object. The ‘missing wedge’ is marked with grey triangles. (c) The reconstructed object under ideal conditions (sampling and covering). (d) Reconstruction of the object from the tilt series with back‐projection. From left to right: the reconstruction with tilt series over the range [−50°,+50°] with 1, 3, 5, 15 and 25 projections. The influence of the limited tilt range and the angular sampling are apparent.

Figure 3.

Specimen preparation techniques for electron tomography.

Figure 4.

The ultrastructures of cells preserved by different specimen preparation techniques. (a) and (b) Well‐preserved cellular organization and ultrastructures observed in ileal epithelial cells in suckling rats prepared with HPF/FSF – microtubules (pointed by red arrows) attached to tubular vesicles; ordered structures on the inner surface of large vesicles (pointed by blue arrow); membranes of vesicles and mitochondria are well‐preserved; (unpublished results) (c) Molecular organizations of desmosomes and cell skeletons observed in mouse skin prepared with HPF/FSF (reproduced from He et al. , with permission from the American Association for the Advancement of Science). (d) Vesicle with ordered structures observed in ileum of suckling rat prepared with HPF/FSF (unpublished result). (e) Tracing endocytosed 1.4 nm Nanogold particles by HPF/FSF‐gold‐enlarging techniques (He et al., ) (unpublished result). (f) Coated vesicles in thin region of fibroblast prepared by plunge freezing (reproduced from Koning et al. with permission from Elsevier). (g) High‐resolution ultrastructures of desmosomes in human skin prepared by frozen‐hydrated sectioning (reproduced with permission from Al‐Amoudi et al. ).

Figure 5.

Interpretation of tomograms. (a) Vaccinia virus (top) denoised with anisotropic nonlinear diffusion (bottom; Cyrklaff et al., ). (b) Cellular context of tubular vesicles (right) modelled by manual segmentation (left; reproduced from He et al. with permission from Nature Publishing Group). (c) Atlas of the 80S ribosome (bottom) built from a section of S. cerevisiae (top) after detection with template matching, alignment and averaging (Pierson et al., ).



Al‐Amoudi A, Diez DC, Betts MJ and Frangakis AS (2007) The molecular architecture of cadherins in native epidermal desmosomes. Nature 450: 832–837.

Al‐Amoudi A, Dubochet J, Gnaegi H, Lüthi W and Studer D (2003) An oscillating cryo‐knife reduces cutting‐induced deformation of vitreous ultrathin sections. Journal of Microscopy 212: 26–33.

Al‐Amoudi A, Dubochet J and Norlén L (2005b) Nanostructure of the epidermal extracellular space as observed by cryo‐electron microscopy of vitreous sections of human skin. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 124: 764–777.

Al‐Amoudi A, Studer D and Dubochet J (2005a) Cutting artefacts and cutting process in vitreous sections for cryo‐electron microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology 150: 109–121.

Bartesaghi A, Sprechmann P, Liu J et al. (2008) Classification and 3D averaging with missing wedge correction in biological electron tomography. Journal of Structural Biology 162: 436–450.

Beck M, Forster F, Ecke M et al. (2004) Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 306: 1387–1390.

Brandt F, Etchells SA, Ortiz JO et al. (2009) The native 3D organization of bacterial polysomes. Cell 136: 261–271.

Cyrklaff M, Risco C, Fernandez JJ et al. (2005) Cryo‐electron tomography of vaccinia virus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102: 2772–2777.

Danev R, Glaeser RM and Nagayama K (2009) Practical factors affecting the performance of a thin‐film phase plate for transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 109: 312–325.

Dierksen K, Typke D, Hegerl R and Baumeister W (1993) Towards automatic electron tomography II. Implementation of autofocus and low‐dose procedures. Ultramicroscopy 49: 109–120.

Dierksen K, Typke D, Hegerl R, Koster AJ and Baumeister W (1992) Towards automatic electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 40: 71–87.

Diestra E, Fontana J, Guichard P, Marco S and Risco C (2009) Visualization of proteins in intact cells with a clonable tag for electron microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology 165: 157–168.

Dubochet J, Adrian M, Chang JJ et al. (1988) Cryo‐electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 21: 129–228.

Fernandez JJ and Li S (2003) An improved algorithm for anisotropic nonlinear diffusion for denoising cryo‐tomograms. Journal of Structural Biology 144: 152–161.

Frangakis AS and Hegerl R (2001) Noise reduction in electron tomographic reconstructions using nonlinear anisotropic diffusion. Journal of Structural Biology 135: 239–250.

Frank J (ed.) (2006) Electron Tomography: Methods for Three‐Dimensional Visualization of Structures in the Cell. Berlin: Springer.

Grimm R, Singh H, Rachel R et al. (1998) Electron tomography of ice‐embedded prokaryotic cells. Biophysics Journal 74: 1031–1042.

Grunewald K, Desai P, Winkler DC et al. (2003) Three‐dimensional structure of herpes simplex virus from cryo‐electron tomography. Science 302: 1396–1398.

Haider M, Müller H, Uhlemann S et al. (2008) Prerequisites for a Cc/Cs‐corrected ultrahigh‐resolution TEM. Ultramicroscopy 108: 167–178.

He W, Cowin P and Stokes DL (2003) Untangling desmosomal knots with electron tomography. Science 302: 109–113.

He W, Ladinsky MS, Huey‐Tubman KE et al. (2008) FcRn‐mediated antibody transport across epithelial cells revealed by electron tomography. Nature 455: 542–546.

Hoenger A and McIntosh JR (2009) Probing the macromolecular organization of cells by electron tomography. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 21: 89–96.

Koning RI and Koster AJ (2009) Cryo‐electron tomography in biology and medicine. Annals of Anatomy 191: 427–445.

Koning RI, Zovko S, Bárcena M et al. (2008) Cryo electron tomography of vitrified fibroblasts: microtubule plus ends in situ. Journal of Structural Biology 161: 459–468.

Koster AJ, Chen H, Sedat JW and Agard DA (1992) Automated microscopy for electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 46: 207–227.

Kurner J, Frangakis AS and Baumeister W (2005) Cryo‐electron tomography reveals the cytoskeletal structure of Spiroplasma melliferum. Science 307: 436–438.

Le Gros MA, McDermott G and Larabell CA (2005) X‐ray tomography of whole cells. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 15: 593–600.

Leis A, Rockel B, Andrees L and Baumeister W (2009) Visualizing cells at the nanoscale. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 34: 60–70.

Liu J, Bartesaghi A, Borgnia MJ, Sapiro G and Subramaniam S (2008) Molecular architecture of native HIV‐1 gp120 trimers. Nature 455: 109–113.

Lucic V, Forster F and Baumeister W (2005) Structural studies by electron tomography: from cells to molecules. Annual Review of Biochemistry 74: 833–865.

Marko M, Hsieh C, Schalek R, Frank J and Mannella C (2007) Focused‐ion‐beam thinning of frozen‐hydrated biological specimens for cryo‐electron microscopy. Nature Methods 4: 215–217.

McDonald K (2007) Cryopreparation methods for electron microscopy of selected model systems. In: McIntosh JR (ed.) Cellular Electron Microscopy in ‘Methods in Cell Biology’ (Series eds: Wilson L and Matsudaria P), vol. 79, pp. 23–56. San Diego: Academic Press.

McIntosh JR (ed.) (2007) Cellular Electron Microscopy, Volume 79 of Methods in Cell Biology. San Diego: Academic press.

McIntosh JR, Nicastro D and Mastronarde D (2005) New views of cells in 3D: an introduction to electron tomography. Trends in Cell Biology 15: 43–51.

Medalia O, Weber I, Frangakis AS et al. (2002) Macromolecular architecture in eukaryotic cells visualized by cryoelectron tomography. Science 298: 1209–1213.

Mercogliano CP and DeRosier DJ (2007) Concatenated metallothionein as a clonable gold label for electron microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology 160: 70–82.

Moor H (1987) Theory and practice of high pressure freezing. In: Steinbrecht RA and Zierold K (eds) Cryotechniques in Biological Electron Microscopy, pp. 175–191. Heidelberg: Springer.

Nicastro D, Schwartz C, Pierson J et al. (2006) The molecular architecture of axonemes revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 313: 944–948.

Nickell S, Kofler C, Leis AP and Baumeister W (2006) A visual approach to proteomics. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 7: 225–230.

Ortiz JO, Forster F, Kurner J, Linaroudis AA and Baumeister W (2006) Mapping 70S ribosomes in intact cells by cryoelectron tomography and pattern recognition. Journal of Structural Biology 156: 334–341.

Pierson J, Fernandez JJ, Bos E et al. (2008) Visualization of the 80s ribosome in situ using cryo‐electron tomography of vitreous sections. Proceedings of the European Microscopy Congress 2008, Vol. 3: Life Science, pp. 89–90, Berlin, Springer.

Staehelin LA and Kang BH (2008) Nanoscale architecture of endoplasmic reticulum export sites and of Golgi membranes as determined by electron tomography. Plant Physiology 147: 1454–1468.

Steinbrecht RA and Müller M (1987) Freeze‐substitution and freeze‐drying. In: Steinbrecht RA and Zierold K (eds) Cryotechniques in Biological Electron Microscopy, pp. 149–172. Berlin: Springer.

Tokuyasu KT (1973) A technique for ultracryotomy of cell suspensions and tissues. Journal of Cell Biology 57: 551–565.

Winkler H, Zhu P, Liu J et al. (2009) Tomographic subvolume alignment and subvolume classification applied to myosin V and SIV envelope spikes. Journal of Structural Biology 165: 64–77.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
He, Wanzhong, and Fernández, José‐Jesús(Jan 2010) Electron Tomography. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021877]