Fifteen Years of Evolutionary Genomics in Caenorhabditis elegans


The nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, introduced by Sydney Brenner for the genetic analysis of nervous system formation, is now a powerful model organism for studying nearly all aspects of biology, from development to diseases to evolution. Sequencing and analysis of the worm genome revealed intriguing nonrandom patterns of genome organisation and unusual features such as abundant operons. Surprising upon first discovery, worms and humans have a similar number of genes that are comprised of a similar proportion of transcription factors to regulate their genomes. However, differences in small ribonucleic acid content may contribute to differences in organismal complexity. In nature, the bacterivorous C. elegans is found primarily on rotting vegetation in temperate regions across the world. Natural selection, combined with the low effective recombination rate associated with selfing, strongly reduces nucleotide variation across the genome, yielding similarly low polymorphism to other selfing hermaphrodite species of Caenorhabditis. The genus Caenorhabditis provides a superb model system for ecological and evolutionary genetics, benefiting from C. elegans tools and information when applied to investigations of species with a higher polymorphism and better known ecological context.

Key Concepts:

  • The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, introduced by Sydney Brenner for the genetic analysis of nervous system development, was the first metazoan to have a complete sequenced genome and is now a model organism for nearly all fields of biology.

  • Many genomic features are not randomly distributed along C. elegans chromosomes and are prevalent either in the chromosome arms or in its centre.

  • An unusually large fraction of protein‐coding genes is organised in operons, possibly optimising transcriptional resources during recovery from developmental arrest.

  • Gene duplication and alternative splicing contribute to extensive diversification of gene function, with 10.5% of protein‐coding genes having paralogs and 25% of genes being alternatively spliced.

  • The ratio of transcription factors to protein‐coding genes is similar in worms and humans but the two species differ greatly in their microRNA content.

  • The differences in chromatin states contribute to phenotypic variation and the transgenerational epigenetic inheritance suggests a role for epigenetic information in evolution.

  • The rate of duplication is two orders of magnitude greater than the nucleotide mutation rate, highlighting the role of gene duplication in the evolution of the C. elegans genome.

  • Caenorhabditis is not a soil nematode but instead proliferates and feeds on bacteria in rotting vegetation.

  • Population genetic variation is strongly affected by the mating system of Caenorhabditis, with very low polymorphism in selfing hermaphroditic species relative to outcrossing gonochoristic species.

Keywords: Caenorhabditis; genome evolution; operons; gene regulation; mating systems; epigenetics; polymorphism

Figure 1.

Nonrandom patterns in the organisation of the C. elegans genome. Chromosomes are typically partitioned into arms (yellow) and centres (blue) that differ by the relative distribution of several genomic features. Each domain makes ∼30% of the chromosome length, although arms are asymmetric relative to centre and the position of centres varies among chromosomes. Here, features are mapped to a chromosome domain (grey line), arm or centre, when their abundance in this domain is greater than on the other domain. For instance, protein‐coding genes are preferentially distributed in chromosome centres and recombination occurs more frequently in chromosome arms. Note that the distribution of genomic features in the arms does not differentiate between left and right ends (see Cutter et al., and references therein; Gerstein et al., ).

Figure 2.

The base substitution rate (per nucleotide and per generation) is similar within and between C. elegans and C. briggsae for the mitochondrial genome (a) and the nuclear genome (b). In both species the mitochondrial mutation rate is 100‐fold larger than the nuclear mutation rate (note the scale difference of the y‐axis in (a) and (b)). Means are represented with ±1 standard error of the mean, in red for C. briggsae (Cbr) and in yellow for C. elegans (Cel). Data for the mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome of C. elegans is from Denver et al. () and from Howe et al. () for C. briggsae. In (b), the mutation rate for each C. elegans and C. briggsae MA lines (Denver et al., ) is also pooled to obtain an average estimate for each species.

Figure 3.

A selfing mode of reproduction has evolved independently three times (in red) from a gonochoristic ancestor in the genus Caenorhabditis (left). The level of nucleotide variation is strongly affected by the mating type and is greater in gonochoristic outcrossing Caenorhabditis species (blue) than in hermaphroditic selfing species (yellow) (right). The average level of neutral site diversity (at silent or synonymous sites) is plotted for each species. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean with values smaller than the symbol size not shown. Updated from Cutter et al. with data for C. briggsae (Félix et al., ), Caenorhabditis sp. 23 (Dey et al., ), and Caenorhabditis sp. 11 (Gimond et al., personal communication). The 5% threshold identifies hyperdiverse species (Cutter et al., ).



Abebe E, Abebe‐Akele F, Morrison J, Cooper V and Thomas WK (2011) An insect pathogenic symbiosis between a Caenorhabditis and Serratia. Virulence 2: 158–161.

Abebe E, Jumba M, Bonner K et al. (2010) An entomopathogenic Caenorhabditis briggsae. Journal of Experimental Biology 213: 3223–3229.

Andersen EC, Gerke JP, Shapiro JA et al. (2012) Chromosome‐scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity. Nature Genetics 44: 285–290.

Anderson JL, Morran LT and Phillips PC (2010) Outcrossing and the maintenance of males within C. elegans populations. Journal of Heredity 101: S62–S74.

Ashe A, Sapetschnig A, Weick EM et al. (2012) piRNAs can trigger a multigenerational epigenetic memory in the germline of C. elegans. Cell 150: 88–99.

Baer CF, Joyner‐Matos J, Ostrow D et al. (2010) Rapid decline in fitness of mutation accumulation lines of gonochoristic (outcrossing) Caenorhabditis nematodes. Evolution 64: 3242–3253.

Baer CF, Shaw F, Steding C et al. (2005) Comparative evolutionary genetics of spontaneous mutations affecting fitness in rhabditid nematodes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102: 5785–5790.

Bargmann CI (1998) Neurobiology of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Science 282: 2028–2033.

Barriere A and Félix MA (2007) Temporal dynamics and linkage disequilibrium in natural Caenorhabditis elegans populations. Genetics 176: 999–1011.

Bergamasco C and Bazzicalupo P (2006) Chemical sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 63: 1510–1522.

Bird A (2002) DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes & Development 16: 6–21.

Blumenthal T, Evans D, Link CD et al. (2002) A global analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans operons. Nature 417: 851–854.

Blumenthal T and Gleason KS (2003) Caenorhabditis elegans operons: form and function. Nature Genetics Reviews 4: 112–120.

Burga A, Casanueva MO and Lehner B (2011) Predicting mutation outcome from early stochastic variation in genetic interaction partners. Nature 480: 250–253.

Burton NO, Burkhart KB and Kennedy S (2011) Nuclear RNAi maintains heritable gene silencing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108: 19683–19688.

Capra EJ, Skrovanek SM and Kruglyak L (2008) Comparative developmental expression profiling of two C. elegans isolates. PLoS One 3: e4055.

Cutter AD and Agrawal AF (2010) The evolutionary dynamics of operon distributions in eukaryote genomes. Genetics 185: 685–693.

Cutter AD and Choi JY (2010) Natural selection shapes nucleotide polymorphism across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae. Genome Research 20: 1103–1111.

Cutter AD, Dey A and Murray RL (2009) Evolution of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 1199–1234.

Cutter AD, Jovelin R and Dey A (2013) Molecular hyperdiversity and evolution in very large populations. doi:10.1111/mec.12281.

Cutter AD and Payseur BA (2003) Selection at linked sites in the partial selfer Caenorhabditis elegans. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 665–673.

Deng X, Hiatt JB, Nguyen DK et al. (2011) Evidence for compensatory upregulation of expressed X‐linked genes in mammals, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Genetics 43: 1179–1185.

Denver DR, Dolan PC, Wilhelm LJ et al. (2009) A genome‐wide view of Caenorhabditis elegans base‐substitution mutation processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106: 16310–16314.

Denver DR, Morris K, Lynch M, Vassilieva LL and Thomas WK (2000) High direct estimate of the mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome of Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 289: 2342–2344.

Denver DR, Wilhelm LJ, Howe DK et al. (2012) Variation in base‐substitution mutation in experimental and natural lineages of Caenorhabditis nematodes. Genome Biology and Evolution 4: 513–522.

Dey A, Jeon Y, Wang GX and Cutter AD (2012) Global population genetic structure of Caenorhabditis remanei reveals incipient speciation. Genetics 191: 1257–1269.

Feinberg AP and Irizarry RA (2010) Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: stochastic epigenetic variation as a driving force of development, evolutionary adaptation, and disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107(suppl. 1): 1757–1764.

Félix MA and Duveau F (2012) Population dynamics and habitat sharing of natural populations of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae. BMC Biology 10: 59.

Félix MA, Jovelin R, Ferrari C et al. (2013) Species richness, distribution and genetic diversity of Caenorhabditis nematodes in a remote tropical forest. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13: 10.

Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB et al. (1999) Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151: 1531–1545.

Gassmann R, Rechtsteiner A, Yuen KW et al. (2012) An inverse relationship to germline transcription defines centromeric chromatin in C. elegans. Nature 484: 534–537.

Gerstein MB, Lu ZJ, Van Nostrand EL et al. (2010) Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project. Science 330: 1775–1787.

Greer EL, Maures TJ, Ucar D et al. (2011) Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 479: 365–371.

Gu Z, Steinmetz LM, Gu X et al. (2003) Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations. Nature 421: 63–66.

Guiliano DB and Blaxter ML (2006) Operon conservation and the evolution of trans‐splicing in the phylum Nematoda. PloS Genetics 2: e198.

Haag‐Liautard C, Coffey N, Houle D et al. (2008) Direct estimation of the mitochondrial DNA mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. PloS Biology 6: e204.

Haag‐Liautard C, Dorris M, Maside X et al. (2007) Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 445: 82–85.

Haerty W, Artieri C, Khezri N, Singh RS and Gupta BP (2008) Comparative analysis of function and interaction of transcription factors in nematodes: extensive conservation of orthology coupled to rapid sequence evolution. BMC Genomics 9: 399.

Hall SE, Beverly M, Russ C, Nusbaum C and Sengupta P (2010) A cellular memory of developmental history generates phenotypic diversity in C. elegans. Current Biology 20: 149–155.

Heimberg AM, Sempere LF, Moy VN, Donoghue PC and Peterson KJ (2008) MicroRNAs and the advent of vertebrate morphological complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 2946–2950.

Herrmann M, Mayer WE, Hong RL et al. (2007) The nematode Pristionchus pacificus (Nematoda: Diplogastridae) is associated with the oriental beetle Exomala orientalis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Japan. Zoological Science 24: 883–889.

Hillier LW, Miller RD, Baird SE et al. (2007) Comparison of C. elegans and C. briggsae genome sequences reveals extensive conservation of chromosome organization and synteny. PloS Biology 5: e167.

Hobert O (2008) Regulatory logic of neuronal diversity: terminal selector genes and selector motifs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 20067–20071.

Howe DK, Baer CF and Denver DR (2010) High rate of large deletions in Caenorhabditis briggsae mitochondrial genome mutation processes. Genome Biology and Evolution 2: 29–38.

Hsiao TL and Vitkup D (2008) Role of duplicate genes in robustness against deleterious human mutations. PloS Genetics 4: e1000014.

Huang P, Pleasance ED, Maydan JS et al. (2007) Identification and analysis of internal promoters in Caenorhabditis elegans operons. Genome Research 17: 1478–1485.

Jovelin R (2009) Rapid sequence evolution of transcription factors controlling neuron differentiation in Caenorhabditis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 2373–2386.

Jovelin R and Cutter AD (2011) MicroRNA sequence variation potentially contributes to within‐species functional divergence in the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae. Genetics 189: 967–976.

Jovelin R, Dunham JP, Sung FS and Phillips PC (2009) High nucleotide divergence in developmental regulatory genes contrasts with the structural elements of olfactory pathways in Caenorhabditis. Genetics 181: 1387–1397.

Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y et al. (2003) Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421: 231–237.

Katju V and Lynch M (2003) The structure and early evolution of recently arisen gene duplicates in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Genetics 165: 1793–1803.

Katju V and Lynch M (2006) On the formation of novel genes by duplication in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 1056–1067.

Keightley PD, Trivedi U, Thomson M et al. (2009) Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. Genome Research 19: 1195–1201.

Kelly WG, Schaner CE, Dernburg AF et al. (2002) X‐chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans. Development 129: 479–492.

Kiontke K and Sudhaus W (2006) Ecology of Caenorhabditis species. WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook, doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.37.1,

Kiontke KC, Felix MA, Ailion M et al. (2011) A phylogeny and molecular barcodes for Caenorhabditis, with numerous new species from rotting fruits. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 339.

Levin M, Hashimshony T, Wagner F and Yanai I (2012) Developmental milestones punctuate gene expression in the Caenorhabditis embryo. Developmental Cell 22: 1101–1108.

Li J, Yuan Z and Zhang Z (2010) The cellular robustness by genetic redundancy in budding yeast. PloS Genetics 6: e1001187.

Li WH, Yang J and Gu X (2005) Expression divergence between duplicate genes. Trends in Genetics 21: 602–607.

Lipinski KJ, Farslow JC, Fitzpatrick KA et al. (2011) High spontaneous rate of gene duplication in Caenorhabditis elegans. Current Biology 21: 306–310.

Lynch M (2007) The Origins of Genome Architecture. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

Lynch M (2010) Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends in Genetics 26: 345–352.

Lynch M and Conery JS (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151–1155.

Martinez NJ, Ow MC, Barrasa MI et al. (2008) A C. elegans genome‐scale microRNA network contains composite feedback motifs with high flux capacity. Genes & Development 22: 2535–2549.

Masri L, Schulte RD, Timmermeyer N et al. (2013) Sex differences in host defence interfere with parasite‐mediated selection for outcrossing during host‐parasite coevolution. Ecology Letters. doi:10.1111/ele.12068.

Matsuba C, Ostrow DG, Salomon MP, Tolani A and Baer CF (2012) Temperature, stress and spontaneous mutation in Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis elegans. Biology Letters 9: 20120334.

Maydan JS, Lorch A, Edgley ML, Flibotte S and Moerman DG (2010) Copy number variation in the genomes of twelve natural isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Genomics 11: 62.

Melters DP, Paliulis LV, Korf IF and Chan SW (2012) Holocentric chromosomes: convergent evolution, meiotic adaptations, and genomic analysis. Chromosome Research 20: 579–593.

Meneely PM, McGovern OL, Heinis FI and Yanowitz JL (2012) Crossover distribution and frequency are regulated by him‐5 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 190: 1251–1266.

Meyer BJ (2010) Targeting X chromosomes for repression. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 20: 179–189.

Morran LT, Cappy BJ, Anderson JL and Phillips PC (2009a) Sexual partners for the stressed: facultative outcrossing in the self‐fertilizing nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 63: 1473–1482.

Morran LT, Parmenter MD and Phillips PC (2009b) Mutation load and rapid adaptation favour outcrossing over self‐fertilization. Nature 462: 350–352.

Morran LT, Schmidt OG, Gelarden IA, Parrish RC 2nd and Lively CM (2011) Running with the Red Queen: host–parasite coevolution selects for biparental sex. Science 333: 216–218.

Nakano S, Stillman B and Horvitz HR (2011) Replication‐coupled chromatin assembly generates a neuronal bilateral asymmetry in C. elegans. Cell 147: 1525–1536.

Nordborg M (2000) Linkage disequilibrium, gene trees and selfing: an ancestral recombination graph with partial self‐fertilization. Genetics 154: 923–929.

Okumura E, Tanaka R and Yoshiga T (2012) Species‐specific recognition of the carrier insect by dauer larvae of the nematode Caenorhabditis japonica. Journal of Experimental Biology 216: 568–572.

Pannell JR and Charlesworth B (2000) Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 355: 1851–1864.

Phillips N, Salomon M, Custer A, Ostrow D and Baer CF (2009) Spontaneous mutational and standing genetic (co)variation at dinucleotide microsatellites in Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis elegans. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 659–669.

Prasad A, Croydon‐Sugarman MJ, Murray RL and Cutter AD (2011) Temperature‐dependent fecundity associates with latitude in Caenorhabditis briggsae. Evolution 65: 52–63.

Qian W and Zhang J (2008) Evolutionary dynamics of nematode operons: easy come, slow go. Genome Research 18: 412–421.

Ramani AK, Calarco JA, Pan Q et al. (2010) Genome‐wide analysis of alternative splicing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Research 21: 342–348.

Ramani AK, Chuluunbaatar T, Verster AJ et al. (2012) The majority of animal genes are required for wild‐type fitness. Cell 148: 792–802.

Reece‐Hoyes JS, Deplancke B, Shingles J et al. (2005) A compendium of Caenorhabditis elegans regulatory transcription factors: a resource for mapping transcription regulatory networks. Genome Biology 6: R110.

Reinke V and Cutter AD (2009) Germline expression influences operon organization in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Genetics 181: 1219–1228.

Richards EJ (2008) Population epigenetics. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 18: 221–226.

Rockman MV and Kruglyak L (2009) Recombinational landscape and population genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans. PloS Genetics 5: e1000419.

Rockman MV, Skrovanek SS and Kruglyak L (2010) Selection at linked sites shapes heritable phenotypic variation in C. elegans. Science 330: 372–376.

Ross JA, Koboldt DC, Staisch JE et al. (2011) Caenorhabditis briggsae recombinant inbred line genotypes reveal inter‐strain incompatibility and the evolution of recombination. PloS Genetics 7: e1002174.

Rukov JL, Irimia M, Mork S et al. (2007) High qualitative and quantitative conservation of alternative splicing in Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 909–917.

Schvarzstein M, Wignall SM and Villeneuve AM (2010) Coordinating cohesion, co‐orientation, and congression during meiosis: lessons from holocentric chromosomes. Genes & Development 24: 219–228.

Solorzano E, Okamoto K, Datla P et al. (2011) Shifting patterns of natural variation in the nuclear genome of Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 168.

Stein LD, Bao Z, Blasiar D et al. (2003) The genome sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: a platform for comparative genomics. PloS Biology 1: 166–192.

Stoltzfus A and Yampolsky LY (2009) Climbing mount probable: mutation as a cause of nonrandomness in evolution. Journal of Heredity 100: 637–647.

Studencka M, Wesolowski R, Opitz L et al. (2011) Transcriptional repression of Hox genes by C. elegans HP1/HPL and H1/HIS‐24. PloS Genetics 8: e1002940.

Thomas CG, Li R, Smith HE et al. (2012) Simplification and desexualization of gene expression in self‐fertile nematodes. Current Biology 22: 2167–2172.

Tian D, Wang Q, Zhang P et al. (2008) Single‐nucleotide mutation rate increases close to insertions/deletions in eukaryotes. Nature 455: 105–108.

Tischler J, Lehner B, Chen N and Fraser AG (2006) Combinatorial RNA interference in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals that redundancy between gene duplicates can be maintained for more than 80 million years of evolution. Genome Biology 7: R69.

Troemel ER, Kimmel BE and Bargmann CI (1997) Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans. Cell 91: 161–169.

Tsai CJ, Mets DG, Albrecht MR et al. (2008) Meiotic crossover number and distribution are regulated by a dosage compensation protein that resembles a condensin subunit. Genes & Development 22: 194–211.

Vaquerizas JM, Kummerfeld SK, Teichmann SA and Luscombe NM (2009) A census of human transcription factors: function, expression and evolution. Nature Genetics Reviews 10: 252–263.

Vavouri T, Semple JI and Lehner B (2008) Widespread conservation of genetic redundancy during a billion years of eukaryotic evolution. Trends in Genetics 24: 485–488.

Wagner CR, Kuervers L, Baillie DL and Yanowitz JL (2010) xnd‐1 regulates the global recombination landscape in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 467: 839–843.

Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S et al. (2008) Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 456: 470–476.

de Wit E, Linsen SE, Cuppen E and Berezikov E (2009) Repertoire and evolution of miRNA genes in four divergent nematode species. Genome Research 19: 2064–2074.

Yampolsky LY and Stoltzfus A (2001) Bias in the introduction of variation as an orienting factor in evolution. Evolution & Development 3: 73–83.

Yanai I and Hunter CP (2009) Comparison of diverse developmental transcriptomes reveals that coexpression of gene neighbors is not evolutionarily conserved. Genome Research 19: 2214–2220.

Zaslaver A, Baugh LR and Sternberg PW (2011) Metazoan operons accelerate recovery from growth‐arrested states. Cell 145: 981–992.

Further Reading

Cutter AD, Jovelin R and Dey A (2013) Molecular hyperdiversity and evolution in very large populations. Molecular Ecology. doi:10.1111/mec.12281.

Felix MA and Braendle C (2010) The natural history of Caenorhabditis elegans. Current Biology 20: R965–R969.

Gaertner BE and Phillips PC (2010) Caenorhabditis elegans as a platform for molecular quantitative genetics and systems biology of natural variation. Genetical Research 92: 331–348.

Wenzel D, Palladino F and Jedrusik‐Bode M (2011) Epigenetics in C. elegans: facts and challenges. Genesis 49: 647–661.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Jovelin, Richard, Dey, Alivia, and Cutter, Asher D(May 2013) Fifteen Years of Evolutionary Genomics in Caenorhabditis elegans. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0022897]